@article{oberauer2006fmc,
	title = {{A formal model of capacity limits in working memory}},
	author = {K. Oberauer and R. Kliegl},
	journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
	number = {4},
	pages = {601--626},
	publisher = {Elsevier},
	volume = {55},
	year = {2006},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21db8927b79bf1397e066e83bf3f0e8af/tmalsburg},
	abstract = {A mathematical model of working-memory capacity limits is proposed on the key assumption of mutual interference between items in working memory. Interference is assumed to arise from overwriting of features shared by these items. The model was fit to time-accuracy data of memory-updating tasks from four experiments using nonlinear mixed effect (NLME) models as a framework. The model gave a good account of the data from a numerical and a spatial task version. The performance pattern in a combination of numerical and spatial updating could be explained by variations in the interference parameter: assuming less feature overlap between contents from different domains than between contents from the same domain, the model can account for double dissociations of content domains in dual-task experiments. Experiment 3 extended this idea to similarity within the verbal domain. The decline of memory accuracy with increasing memory load was steeper with phonologically similar than with dissimilar material, although processing speed was faster for the similar material. The model captured the similarity effects with a higher estimated interference parameter for the similar than for the dissimilar condition. The results are difficult to explain with alternative models, in particular models incorporating time-based decay and models assuming limited resource pools.},
	keywords = {model visualperception workingmemory }
}

@article{journals/corr/abs-0802-2201,
	title = {Reconstruction of eye movements during blinks},
	author = {M. S. Baptista and Christiane Bohn and Reinhold Kliegl and Ralf Engbert and Jürgen Kurths},
	journal = {CoRR},
	note = {informal publication},
	url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr0802.html#abs-0802-2201},
	volume = {abs/0802.2201},
	year = {2008},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/255bacce29365dee584115e55573f1b80/dblp},
	description = {dblp},
	ee = {http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.2201}, date = {2008-03-03},
	keywords = {dblp }
}

@article{KlieglEtAl2005,
	title = {Tracking the Mind During Reading: The Influence of Past, Present, and Future Words on Fixation Durations},
	author = {Reinhold Kliegl and Antje Nuthmann and Ralf Engbert},
	journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology},
	number = {1},
	pages = {12--35},
	volume = {135},
	year = {2005},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20927094bdfa1644b6e0f77374ea3a758/stefano},
	abstract = {Reading requires the orchestration of visual, attentional, language-related, and oculomotor processing
constraints. This study replicates previous effects of frequency, predictability, and length of fixated words
on fixation durations in natural reading and demonstrates new effects of these variables related to
previous and next words. Results are based on fixation durations recorded from 222 persons, each reading
144 sentences. Such evidence for distributed processing of words across fixation durations challenges
psycholinguistic immediacy-of-processing and eye-mind assumptions. Most of the time the mind
processes several words in parallel at different perceptual and cognitive levels. Eye movements can help
to unravel these processes.
},
	keywords = {attention eyetracking parallel psychology reading }
}

@article{EngbertKliegl2003,
	title = {Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention},
	author = {Ralf Engbert and Reinhold Kliegl},
	journal = {Vision Res},
	month = {Apr},
	number = {9},
	pages = {1035-1045},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12676246&dopt=Citation},
	volume = {43},
	year = {2003},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a6ac7fcc4994e695e649edf9b2ba4505/tmalsburg},
	description = {Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert at...[Vision Res. 2003] - PubMed Result},
	abstract = {Fixational eye movements are subdivided into tremor, drift, and microsaccades. All three types of miniature eye movements generate small random displacements of the retinal image when viewing a stationary scene. Here we investigate the modulation of microsaccades by shifts of covert attention in a classical spatial cueing paradigm. First, we replicate the suppression of microsaccades with a minimum rate about 150 ms after cue onset. Second, as a new finding we observe microsaccadic enhancement with a maximum rate about 350 ms after presentation of the cue. Third, we find a modulation of the orientation towards the cue direction. These multiple influences of visual attention on microsaccades accentuate their role for visual information processing. Furthermore, our results suggest that microsaccades can be used to map the orientation of visual attention in psychophysical experiments.},
	doi = {}, pmid = {12676246},
	keywords = {B_scanpathsimilarity algorithm eyemovements saccades vision }
}

@article{journals/bc/EngbertK01,
	title = {Mathematical models of eye movements in reading: a possible role for autonomous saccades.},
	author = {Ralf Engbert and Reinhold Kliegl},
	journal = {Biological Cybernetics},
	number = {2},
	pages = {77-87},
	url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/bc/bc85.html#EngbertK01},
	volume = {85},
	year = {2001},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/259ec9f71b2040b40edc5e1ba7b6feb85/dblp},
	description = {dblp},
	ee = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00008001}, date = {2007-09-17},
	keywords = {dblp }
}

@inbook{SchlesewskyEtAl2000,
	title = {The subject preference in the processing of locally ambiguous wh-questions in German},
	author = {Matthias Schlesewsky and Gisbert Fanselow and Reinhold Kliegl and Josef Krems},
	booktitle = {German Sentence Processing},
	editor = {Barbara Hemforth and Lars Konieczny},
	publisher = {Kluver},
	year = {2000},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23f70781544bc3e187e1fa82c351f803e/tmalsburg},
	abstract = {The processing of locally ambiguous wh-phrases has received much attention in the last
years, and experimental results reported in the literature converge in at least one respect:
if a clause-initial NP is locally ambiguous between a subject and an object interpretation,
the human parser strongly prefers the former reading. The present chapter constitutes no
exception to this general picture.
    Our focus therefore does not so much lie in the identification of surprising new data,
but rather on establishing that the subject preference is an ubiquituous phenomenon in
German, and in particular on showing that it is caused by a syntax-related aspect of
sentence processing (and not, say, by tuning to frequencies, by semantic preferences,
etc.). Another issue is the identification of the point of time in on-line processing at
which the subject preference is established.
    A series of four self-paced reading and two offline studies investigating various types
of German wh-questions will be presented, which strongly support a syntactic
interpretation of the subject preference. We will discuss these results in the context of a
broader framework covering the processing of unambiguous questions as well (cf.
Schlesewsky, Fanselow, and Kliegl 1997a), which takes differences in memory load to be
the crucial factor in the processing of wh-questions.
},
	keywords = {ambiguityresolution german readingtime selfpacedreading sentenceprocessing }
}

@inbook{KlieglEngbert2003,
	title = {SWIFT Explorations},
	author = {Reinhold Kliegl and Ralf Engbert},
	booktitle = {The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research},
	publisher = {Elsevier Science Ltd.},
	year = {2003},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2060dd60d807140820306fda26552b5e8/tmalsburg},
	abstract = {SWIFT is a computational model of eye guidance in reading. It assumes
(1) spatially distributed lexical processing, (2) a separation of saccade
timing from saccade target selection, and (3) autonomous and parallel
generation of saccades with inhibition by foveal targets. The model
accounts for fixation probabilities as well as various measures of inspection time in their relation to lexical processing difficulty. We illustrate
the dynamics associated with saccade generation and inhibition by
foveal targets. In addition, we generate predictions for an experiment
involving gaze-contingent display change.
},
	keywords = {computationalpsycholinguistics eyemovements mathematicalmodeling oculomotorcontrol }
}

@article{KlieglEtAl2004,
	title = {Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading},
	author = {Reinhold Kliegl and Ellen Grabner and Martin Rolfs and Ralf Engbert},
	journal = {European Journal of Cognitive Psychology},
	number = {1/2},
	pages = {262--284},
	publisher = {Psychology Press},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2004},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2eaa54d9d79baf1feca3bdd7e583c1d17/stefano},
	abstract = {We tested the effects of word length, frequency, and predictability on inspection
durations (first fixation, single fixation, gaze duration, and reading time) and
inspection probabilities during first-pass reading (skipped, once, twice) for a
corpus of 144 German sentences (1138 words) and a subset of 144 target words
uncorrelated in length and frequency, read by 33 young and 32 older adults. For
corpus words, length and frequency were reliably related to inspection durations
and probabilities, predictability only to inspection probabilities. For first-pass
reading of target words all three effects were reliable for inspection durations and
probabilities. Low predictability was strongly related to second-pass reading. Older
adults read slower than young adults and had a higher frequency of regressive
movements. The data are to serve as a benchmark for computational models of eye
movement control in reading.
},
	keywords = {eyetracking nlp statistics }
}

@article{KlieglEtAl2005,
	title = {Tracking the Mind During Reading: The Influence of Past, Present, and Future Words on Fixation Durations},
	author = {Reinhold Kliegl and Antje Nuthmann and Ralf Engbert},
	journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology},
	number = {1},
	pages = {12--35},
	volume = {135},
	year = {2005},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20927094bdfa1644b6e0f77374ea3a758/tmalsburg},
	abstract = {Reading requires the orchestration of visual, attentional, language-related, and oculomotor processing
constraints. This study replicates previous effects of frequency, predictability, and length of fixated words
on fixation durations in natural reading and demonstrates new effects of these variables related to
previous and next words. Results are based on fixation durations recorded from 222 persons, each reading
144 sentences. Such evidence for distributed processing of words across fixation durations challenges
psycholinguistic immediacy-of-processing and eye-mind assumptions. Most of the time the mind
processes several words in parallel at different perceptual and cognitive levels. Eye movements can help
to unravel these processes.
},
	keywords = {cognitivepsychology eyemovements reading readingtime wordrecognition }
}

@article{KlieglEtAl2004,
	title = {Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading},
	author = {Reinhold Kliegl and Ellen Grabner and Martin Rolfs and Ralf Engbert},
	journal = {European Journal of Cognitive Psychology},
	number = {1/2},
	pages = {262--284},
	publisher = {Psychology Press},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2004},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2eaa54d9d79baf1feca3bdd7e583c1d17/tmalsburg},
	abstract = {We tested the effects of word length, frequency, and predictability on inspection
durations (first fixation, single fixation, gaze duration, and reading time) and
inspection probabilities during first-pass reading (skipped, once, twice) for a
corpus of 144 German sentences (1138 words) and a subset of 144 target words
uncorrelated in length and frequency, read by 33 young and 32 older adults. For
corpus words, length and frequency were reliably related to inspection durations
and probabilities, predictability only to inspection probabilities. For first-pass
reading of target words all three effects were reliable for inspection durations and
probabilities. Low predictability was strongly related to second-pass reading. Older
adults read slower than young adults and had a higher frequency of regressive
movements. The data are to serve as a benchmark for computational models of eye
movement control in reading.
},
	keywords = {article cognitivepsychology eyemovements oculomotorcontrol reading }
}