@book{schulz_unitarian_1993,
	title = {The Unitarian Universalist pocket guide},
	address = {Boston},
	author = {William F. Schulz and Association Unitarian Universalist},
	publisher = {Skinner House Books},
	year = {1993},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2444c5651a48103c17c27759971c5b152/au7334},
	isbn = {9781558963191}, comment = {28148490},
	keywords = {289.1 }
}

@article{SchulzIm2008,
	title = {Im Westen geht die Sonne auf : Kalifornien ; die grüne Wende im Westen (Wer sind die Amerikaner? : Geo-Serie USA, Teil 2)},
	author = {Roland Schulz},
	journal = {Geo},
	number = {8},
	pages = {74-90},
	volume = {2008},
	year = {2008},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ef45e8e88c5d92615c4d18830a4bba43/powidl},
	abstract = {"Ein Volk von Klimavergiftern: Die USA können von ihrer Sucht nach Energieverschwendung nicht lassen. Oder doch? Der Bundesstaat Kalifornien probt die Energiewende der weltgrößten Volkswirtschaft. Mit fröhlichem Optimismus suchen Forscher, Investoren und Politiker Antworten auf die Frage: Können wir die Klimaerwärmung abwenden - und trotzdem gut leben?"},
	keywords = {Energiepolitik Kalifornien Klimaschutz USA }
}

@proceedings{SchwarzBogaertsSchulz06,
	title = {Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Case-based Reasoning and Context
	Awareness (CACOA 2006) conjunction with the 8th European Conference
	on Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR 2006)},
	editor = {Sven Schwarz and Steven Bogaerts and Stefan Schulz},
	month = {Nov},
	note = {\url{http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-221/}},
	url = {http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-221/},
	year = {2006},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c88e172da7daeb80b7d81b752a6aba8e/arath},
	description = {mymory},
	language = {english},
	keywords = {mymory }
}

@inproceedings{Schwarz06,
	title = {A Context Model for Personal Knowledge Management Applications},
	author = {Sven Schwarz},
	booktitle = {Modeling and Retrieval of Context, Second International Workshop,
	MRC 2005, Edinburgh, UK, July 31 - August 1, 2005, Revised Selected
	Papers},
	editor = {Thomas Roth-Berghofer and Stefan Schulz and David B. Leake},
	pages = {18--33},
	publisher = {Springer},
	series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
	url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/4526400657457v8t/},
	volume = {3946},
	year = {2006},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c6269e8bca3991943d5845132bd5f1e7/arath},
	description = {mymory},
	isbn = {3-540-33587-0}, language = {english},
	keywords = {context mymory }
}

@article{chartrand98,
	title = {Graph Similarity and Distance in Graphs},
	author = {Gary Chartrand and Grzegorz Kubicki and Michelle Schulz},
	journal = {Aequationes Mathematicae},
	number = {1--2},
	pages = {129--145},
	volume = {55},
	year = {1998},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b51d3525e215b1d7d0410e44cad7cc91/hershbar},
	description = {articles relating to my research, mainly},
	keywords = {imported }
}

@inproceedings{conf/issta/VuducSQSS06,
	title = {Improving distributed memory applications testing by message perturbation.},
	author = {Richard W. Vuduc and Martin Schulz and Dan Quinlan and Bronis R. de Supinski and Andreas Sæbjørnsen},
	booktitle = {PADTAD},
	crossref = {conf/issta/2006p},
	editor = {Shmuel Ur and Eitan Farchi},
	pages = {27-36},
	publisher = {ACM},
	url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/issta/padtad2006.html#VuducSQSS06},
	year = {2006},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25d73177a6612b404d559c227610a155c/dblp},
	description = {dblp},
	date = {2008-08-14}, ee = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1147403.1147409}, isbn = {1-59593-414-6},
	keywords = {dblp }
}

@inproceedings{conf/iceis/SchulzKWM08,
	title = {Evaluation of Search Engine Optimization - Experiments for a Business Site and a New Evaluation Measure.},
	author = {Julia Maria Schulz and Ralph Kölle and Christa Womser-Hacker and Thomas Mandl},
	booktitle = {ICEIS (4)},
	crossref = {conf/iceis/2008-4},
	editor = {José Cordeiro and Joaquim Filipe},
	pages = {247-250},
	url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/iceis/iceis2008-4.html#SchulzKWM08},
	year = {2008},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d30c1ffe7f568ec5d37d396f305ea926/dblp},
	description = {dblp},
	isbn = {978-989-8111-39-5}, date = {2008-08-13},
	keywords = {dblp }
}

@article{RefWorks:204,
	title = {The German Guideline Clearinghouse on Breast Cancer: the need for frequent updating of breast cancer guidelines requires effective guideline updating procedures},
	author = {O. Weingart and D. Sonntag and H. Trapp and H. H. Bartsch and R. G. Baumeister and K. Goerke and K. Giersiepen and H. J. Hindenburg and K. Ming and R. Schulz-Wendtland and S. Storkel and T. Kober and H. Thole and H. Kirchner and G. Ollenschlager and Guideline clearing house on breast cancer},
	journal = {Zeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung : in Zusammenarbeit mit der Kaiserin-Friedrich-Stiftung fur das arztliche Fortbildungswesen},
	month = {Aug},
	note = {LR: 20061115; PUBM: Print; JID: 9707934; ppublish},
	number = {5},
	pages = {403-411},
	volume = {98},
	year = {2004},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20b6d497f4975e56d794c46194fe771d4/mager},
	description = {Leitlinienwartung},
	abstract = {In order to promote the quality of health care and guidelines in Germany the German Guideline Clearinghouse (Sponsors: German Medical Association, National Association of the Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, German Hospital Federation, Associations of the Sickness Funds and the Statutory Pension Insurance) was established at the Agency for Quality in Medicine (AQuMed) in 1999. The results of the 10th Guideline Clearing Project, the Guideline Clearing Report "Breast Cancer", were published in December 2003. In a systematic search using English/German language guideline databases and literature databases (Medline, Healthstar, Embase), 16 national guidelines were identified which were in accordance to the inclusion criteria (breast cancer treatment; German or English language; published after 1992; new guideline or genuine update (no adaptation); recommended for country-wide implementation). The methodological quality of these 16 guidelines was evaluated using the appraisal instrument of the German Guideline Clearinghouse, the checklist "Methodological Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines". A peer review of the guidelines was performed by a multidisciplinary focus group of experts (intended guideline users from clinical and ambulatory settings as well as patients). This group consented comments and recommendations for actions of health care policy makers in Germany for a German breast cancer guideline based on examples from the appraised guidelines. None of the identified guidelines contained information about all of the 24 key topics that the focus group considered to be relevant for a German national guideline. The selected exemplary text extracts from the evaluated guidelines can be used as benchmarks and example sources for the development of a national German breast cancer guideline. From the beginning, patients should be involved in the development process within a multidisciplinary team. Due to the rapid emergence of new evidence, oncology guidelines need an effective procedure for updating in order to ensure that they are able to promote health care quality by giving current recommendations based on best available evidence. International networks such as the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) will be helpful to collect and appraise the evidence for the national guideline development groups in an effective way.},
	isbn = {1431-7621}, language = {ger},
	keywords = {Assurance, Breast Care; Female; Germany; Health Humans; Medical Neoplasms/therapy; Oncology/standards; Quality Societies, }
}

@article{RefWorks:713,
	title = {The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration},
	author = {D. G. Altman and K. F. Schulz and D. Moher and M. Egger and F. Davidoff and D. Elbourne and P. C. Gotzsche and T. Lang and CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials)},
	journal = {Annals of Internal Medicine},
	month = {Apr 17},
	note = {LR: 20061115; PUBM: Print; JID: 0372351; CIN: Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 18;136(12):926-7; author reply 926-7. PMID: 12069567; CIN: Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 18;136(12):926-7; author reply 926-7. PMID: 12069568; CIN: Med Clin (Barc). 2005 Mar 26;124(11):439. PMID: 15799859; RF: 204; ppublish},
	number = {8},
	pages = {663-694},
	volume = {134},
	year = {2001},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e2e32ca58c70ab052451b554d5accebd/mager},
	description = {Leitlinienwartung},
	abstract = {Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) is less than optimal. Recent methodologic analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which boast the elimination of systematic error as their primary hallmark. Systematic error in RCTs reflects poor science, and poor science threatens proper ethical standards. A group of scientists and editors developed the CONSORT (Con solidated S tandards o f R eporting T rials) statement to improve the quality of reporting of RCTs. The statement consists of a checklist and flow diagram that authors can use for reporting an RCT. Many leading medical journals and major international editorial groups have adopted the CONSORT statement. The CONSORT statement facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of RCTs by providing guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of their trials. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the CONSORT statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For most items, at least one published example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies are provided. Several examples of flow diagrams are included. The CONSORT statement, this explanatory and elaboration document, and the associated Web site ( http://www.consort-statement.org ) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of randomized trials. Throughout the text, terms marked with an asterisk are defined at end of text.},
	isbn = {0003-4819}, language = {eng},
	keywords = {Algorithms; Control; Controlled Humans; Publishing/standards; Quality Randomized Trials/standards }
}

@inproceedings{conf/sigir/Tait08,
	title = {Noise and information.},
	author = {John Tait},
	booktitle = {AND},
	crossref = {conf/sigir/2008and},
	editor = {Daniel P. Lopresti and Shourya Roy and Klaus U. Schulz and L. Venkata Subramaniam},
	publisher = {ACM},
	series = {ACM International Conference Proceeding Series},
	url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/sigir/and2008.html#Tait08},
	volume = {303},
	year = {2008},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21155fc3bb6a852ae1090cc66cefae858/dblp},
	description = {dblp},
	date = {2008-08-05}, ee = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390749.1390751}, isbn = {978-1-60558-196-5},
	keywords = {dblp }
}