@inproceedings{conf/gi/SutherlandMB07,
	title = {Semantically linking web pages to web services in Bioinformatics.},
	author = {Karen Sutherland and Kenneth McLeod and Albert Burger},
	booktitle = {GI Jahrestagung (2)},
	crossref = {conf/gi/2008-2},
	editor = {Heinz-Gerd Hegering and Axel Lehmann and Hans Jürgen Ohlbach and Christian Scheideler},
	pages = {723-728},
	publisher = {GI},
	series = {LNI},
	url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/gi/gi2008-2.html#SutherlandMB07},
	volume = {134},
	year = {2008},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ec57036e8169efeb35ddba273e9a026c/dblp},
	description = {dblp},
	date = {2008-08-07}, isbn = {978-3-88579-228-4},
	keywords = {dblp }
}

@article{sha90,
	title = {Untitled},
	annote = {cond. opt. modelos 1d,sum rule drude, twisted bound. conditins,f sum rule},
	author = {B. S. Shastry and B. Sutherland},
	journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},
	pages = {243},
	volume = {65},
	year = {1990},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d107ef9f8eb9cdeede12bc2527da73fd/jgl},
	posted-at = {2008-03-07 13:36:30}, priority = {2}, citeulike-article-id = {2484389}, comment = {cond. opt. modelos 1d,sum rule drude, twisted bound. conditins,f sum rule},
	keywords = {high-tc, htsct, theory }
}

@article{scrumpattern,
	title = {SCRUM: An extension pattern language for hyperproductive software development},
	author = {Mike Beedle and Martine Devos and Yonat Sharon and Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland},
	url = {http://jeffsutherland.com/scrum/scrum_plop.pdf},
	year = {2000},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2811c08fc781053f56fd7cbd44a938900/cschenk},
	description = {Has got good definitions for the basic pattern in Scrum, i.e. Backlog, Sprint, etc.},
	abstract = {The patterns of the SCRUM development method are presented as an extension pattern language to the existing organizational pattern languages. In the last few years, the SCRUM development method has rapidly gained recognition as an effective tool to hyper-productive software development. However, when SCRUM patterns are combined with other existing organizational patterns, they lead to highly adaptive, yet well-structured software development organizations.  Also, decomposing SCRUM into patterns can guide adoption of only those parts of SCRUM that are applicable to a specific situation.},
	keywords = {development extension language paper pattern read:2008 scrum }
}

@article{adllftfs,
	title = {Agile Development: Lessons Learned From The First Scrum},
	author = {Dr. Jeff Sutherland},
	month = {October},
	url = {http://jeffsutherland.com/scrum/FirstScrum2004.pdf},
	year = {2004},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2830e8ea9bdc281d3f50536ee0f6f5754/cschenk},
	keywords = {agile article development first lessons read:2008 scrum }
}

@article{citeulike:240990,
	title = {Pandora's box: academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing},
	author = {Wendy Sutherland-Smith},
	journal = {Journal of English for Academic Purposes},
	month = {January},
	number = {1},
	pages = {83--95},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.007},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2005},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d924c4a625f1c608a3eb5706d12ea652/crisox},
	abstract = {Plagiarism is viewed by many academics as a kind of Pandora's box1--the elements contained inside are too frightening to allow escape for fear of the havoc that may result. Reluctance by academic members of staff to discuss student plagiarism openly may contribute to the often untenable situations we, as teachers, face when dealing with student plagiarism issues. In this article, I examine the dilemmas English for Academic Purposes (EAP) staff face when dealing with student plagiarism in the tertiary classroom. The perceptions of all 11 teachers involved in teaching a first year EAP writing subject at South-Coast University2 are detailed in light of the university's policy on plagiarism. My research indicates that not only is an agreed definition of plagiarism difficult to reach by members of staff teaching the same subject, but plagiarism is a multi-layered phenomenon encompassing a spectrum of human intention. Evaluating the spectrum can lead to differences in the implementation of university plagiarism policy, the result of which embodies issues of equity. The aim of the article is to encourage policy-makers and academic staff to acknowledge the concerns about implementation of plagiarism policy. Collaborative, cross-disciplinary re-thinking of plagiarism is needed to reach workable solutions.},
	posted-at = {2008-06-13 14:43:48}, citeulike-article-id = {240990}, priority = {2}, doi = {10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.007},
	keywords = {plag1 plagiarism }
}

@article{Sutherland0,
	title = {Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified
	by horizon scanning},
	author = {William J. Sutherland and Mark J. Bailey and Ian P. Bainbridge and Tom Brereton and Jaimie T. A. Dick and Joanna Drewitt and Nicholas K. Dulvy and Nicholas R. Dusic and Robert P. Freckleton and Kevin J. Gaston and Pam M. Gilder and Rhys E. Green and A. Louise Heathwaite and Sally M. Johnson and David W. Macdonald and Roger Mitchell and Daniel Osborn and Roger P. Owen and Jules Pretty and Stephanie V. Prior and Havard Prosser and Andrew S. Pullin and Paul Rose and Andrew Stott and Tom Tew and Chris D. Thomas and Des B. A. Thompson and Juliet A. Vickery and Matt Walker and Clive Walmsley and Stuart Warrington and Andrew R. Watkinson and Rich J. Williams and Rosie Woodroffe and Harry J. Woodroof},
	journal = {Journal of Applied Ecology},
	number = {0},
	pages = {???-???},
	url = {http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01474.x},
	volume = {0},
	year = {2008},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2500af97482f4182127c0ff8518e445c4/karinnadrowski},
	abstract = { Summary 1. Horizon scanning is an essential tool for environmental
	scientists if they are to contribute to the evidence base for Government,
	its agencies and other decision makers to devise and implement environmental
	policies. The implication of not foreseeing issues that are foreseeable
	is illustrated by the contentious responses to genetically modified
	herbicide-tolerant crops in the UK, and by challenges surrounding
	biofuels, foot and mouth disease, avian influenza and climate change.
	2. A total of 35 representatives from organizations involved in environmental
	policy, academia, scientific journalism and horizon scanning were
	asked to use wide consultation to identify the future novel or step
	changes in threats to, and opportunities for, biodiversity that might
	arise in the UK up to 2050, but that had not been important in the
	recent past. At least 452 people were consulted. 3. Cases for 195
	submitted issues were distributed to all participants for comments
	and additions. All issues were scored (probability, hazard, novelty
	and overall score) prior to a 2-day workshop. Shortlisting to 41
	issues and then the final 25 issues, together with refinement of
	these issues, took place at the workshop during another two rounds
	of discussion and scoring. 4. We provide summaries of the 25 shortlisted
	issues and outline the research needs. 5. We suggest that horizon
	scanning incorporating wide consultation with providers and users
	of environmental science is used by environmental policy makers and
	researchers. This can be used to identify gaps in knowledge and policy,
	and to identify future key issues for biodiversity, including those
	arising from outside the domains of ecology and biodiversity. 6.
	Synthesis and applications. Horizon scanning can be used by environmental
	policy makers and researchers to identify gaps in knowledge and policy.
	Drawing on the experience, expertise and research of policy advisors,
	academics and journalists, this exercise helps set the agenda for
	policy, practice and research. },
	timestamp = {2008.04.26}, file = {Sutherland0.pdf:Sutherland0.pdf:PDF}, owner = {kej}, numlit = {00270}, doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01474.x}, eprint = {http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01474.x},
	keywords = {Sutherland biodiversity horizon_scanning }
}

@book{sutherland1997,
	title = {Business object design and implementation : OOPSLA '95 workshop proceedings, 16 October 1995, Austin, Texas},
	address = {Springer},
	annote = {VIII, 165 S},
	author = {{Jeffrey V.} Sutherland},
	howpublished = {London [u.a.]},
	url = {http://gso.gbv.de/DB=2.1/CMD?ACT=SRCHA&SRT=YOP&IKT=1016&TRM=ppn+216601460&sourceid=fbw_bibsonomy},
	year = {1997},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c0674ee7a6ed30fb3f7028cc21a52850/fbw},
	description = {imported},
	isbn = {3-540-76096-2},
	keywords = {imported }
}

@book{devor2007,
	title = {Statistical quality design and control : contemporary concepts and methods},
	address = {Pearson/Prentice Hall},
	annote = {XVIII, 942 S},
	author = {{Richard E.} DeVor and {Tsong-how} Chang and {John William} Sutherland*1958-* and John W. ACR: Sutherland},
	edition = {2nd ed},
	howpublished = {Upper Saddle River, NJ},
	url = {http://gso.gbv.de/DB=2.1/CMD?ACT=SRCHA&SRT=YOP&IKT=1016&TRM=ppn+512874867&sourceid=fbw_bibsonomy},
	year = {2007},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f66859365bab8be77f213adaf3991678/fbw},
	description = {imported},
	isbn = {0-13-041344-5=978-0-13-041344-4},
	keywords = {Betriebsdatenerfassung Fertigungsmesstechnik Qualitätssicherung Statistische_Prozesslenkung Statistische_Qualitätskontrolle }
}

@inproceedings{conf/ants/KedlayaS08,
	title = {Computing L-Series of Hyperelliptic Curves.},
	author = {Kiran S. Kedlaya and Andrew V. Sutherland},
	booktitle = {ANTS},
	crossref = {conf/ants/2008},
	editor = {Alfred J. van der Poorten and Andreas Stein},
	pages = {312-326},
	publisher = {Springer},
	series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
	url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ants/ants2008.html#KedlayaS08},
	volume = {5011},
	year = {2008},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26a86d4619e1744fed1cf306c28938d34/dblp},
	description = {dblp},
	date = {2008-05-16}, ee = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79456-1_21}, isbn = {978-3-540-79455-4},
	keywords = {dblp }
}

@inproceedings{conf/ants/BrentGTZ08,
	title = {Faster Multiplication in GF(2)[x].},
	author = {Richard P. Brent and Sutherland Pierrick Gaudry and Emmanuel Thomé and Paul Zimmermann},
	booktitle = {ANTS},
	crossref = {conf/ants/2008},
	editor = {Alfred J. van der Poorten and Andreas Stein},
	pages = {153-166},
	publisher = {Springer},
	series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
	url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ants/ants2008.html#BrentGTZ08},
	volume = {5011},
	year = {2008},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/294a9f7274cd88c928c119489236e9130/dblp},
	description = {dblp},
	date = {2008-05-16}, ee = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79456-1_10}, isbn = {978-3-540-79455-4},
	keywords = {dblp }
}