@article{OTDbase39490,
	title = {Accessibility and Perceived Clinical Utility of the GMFM-66: Evaluating Therapists' Judgements of a Computer-Based Scoring Program},
	author = {D. J. Russell and K. M. Leung and P. L. Rosenbaum},
	journal = {POTP},
	number = {2},
	pages = {45--58},
	url = {http://thebishops.org/otdbase/FMPro?-db=otdbase%5fdatabase.fp3\&-format=detail.htm\&-lay=list\&-max=20\&-recid=39490\&-find=},
	volume = {23},
	year = {2003},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/207a4bb4e3f8e087d465ba617bd246a65/willwade},
	abstract = {The 66-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) requires a computer program for scoring. The primary purpose of this study was to pilot test the scoring software and examine the perceived clinical utility of the GMFM-66 as judged by 48 pediatric physical therapists. Sixty-one percent of therapists were confident in their ability to interpret the information from the computer program following one hour spent reading the tutorial and interpretation guidelines. Ninety-three percent of respondents perceived the overall clinical utility of the GMFM-66 in terms of administration, scoring and interpretation to be the same or more clinically useful than the GMFM-88.},
	priority = {2}, citeulike-article-id = {274083},
	keywords = {access computer disability lit-review }
}