@book{minsky75,
	title = {A framework for representing knowledge},
	address = {New York},
	author = {Marvin Minsky},
	pages = {211--277},
	publisher = {McGraw-Hill},
	series = {The Psychology of Computer Vision},
	year = {1975},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/209bf0b4c3add8d13a22f9d7494d4bf41/grahl},
	description = {sdasda},
	comment = {p.211 move from representing it with small fragments -notion of default reasoning ? difference with Gestalt theories p.214 ? focus on how knowledge is structured,psychology is too parsimonious with theories p216 ? but someone must develop these frames for mople to use ? p226 people's vision system are often poorer than they imagine pyramid ?seems to suggest that frames cannot deal with meta-thoughts ?p244- is world regular enough to permit precompiled frames to be useful? ?p251 - to avoid being too specific, frames allow for generalization up the hierarchy -classes should not be seen as inclusion-based. Concepts can have different meanings at different times e.q. Generator is both mechanical and electrical ?p258 - logic stores no intelligence about how a decision was made,what the problem space was. ?p260 - similarity to Kuhn's ideas ?p262 - notion of frames having a satisfaction level or fault tolerance ?p275- a number (derived procedurally ) cannot reflect the considerations that formed it.}, citeulike-article-id = {121798}, priority = {0},
	keywords = {AI frames ontology }
}