@article{suber_author_2003, title = {"Author pays" publishing model}, author = {Peter Suber}, journal = {BMJ}, number = 54, volume = 327, year = 2003, url = {http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1126400}, id = {1372745}, priority = {4}, biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2893686baee99cd17adabb343eb3a4ccb/jsicot}, keywords = {open_journal_system open_access} } @article{hoorn_copyright_2006, title = {Copyright Issues in Open Access Research Journals: The Authors Perspective}, author = {Esther Hoorn and Maurits Van Der Graaf}, journal = {D-Lib Magazine}, number = 2, volume = 12, year = 2006, url = {http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february06/vandergraaf/02vandergraaf.html}, id = {1372797}, priority = {4}, biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a541940d08f9b2b1a1725bcad6e2adce/jsicot}, keywords = {open_journal_system copyright} } @article{guédon_green_2004, title = {The 'Green' and 'Gold' Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching}, author = {Jean C. Guédon}, journal = {Serials Review}, number = 4, pages = {315--328}, volume = 30, year = 2004, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.005}, id = {1372965}, priority = {4}, biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c80651d55c432bee631d5ebd22ac9744/jsicot}, keywords = {open_journal_system open_access OAI} } @article{citeulike:72142, title = {Delivery, Management and Access Model for E_prints and Open Access Journals}, author = {Fytton Rowland and Alma Swan and Paul Needham and Steve Probets and Adrienne Muir and Charles Oppenheim and Ann O'Brien and Rachel Hardy}, journal = {Serials Review}, number = 4, pages = {298--303}, volume = 30, year = 2004, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.006}, id = {72142}, priority = {2}, doi = {10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.006}, abstract = {A study conducted for the (United Kingdom) Joint Information Systems Committee reviewed possible models for implementing Open Access to research reports in institutional archives and Open Access journals. The conclusion was that a "harvesting model," in which full texts reside on the original servers but metadata are harvested, held, and enhanced by a central service, was preferable to either a centralized national service or a completely decentralized service for the UK. The study included issues of populating institutional archives (IAs) and some form of mandatory archiving for publicly funded research results to obtain a critical mass of Open Access material in such a system.}, biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ac555a5821b07daadff8c888b17c29dd/jsicot}, keywords = {open_journal_system e-prints} } @article{citeulike:432003, title = {Open Journal Systems: An example of open source software for journal management and publishing}, author = {J. Willinsky}, journal = {Library Hi Tech}, number = 4, pages = {504--519}, volume = 23, year = 2005, url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do?contentType=Article\&contentId=1529591}, id = {432003}, priority = {2}, abstract = {Purpose – To provide an insider's review of the journal management and publishing software, Open Journal Systems (OJS), from the Public Knowledge Project, which the author directs at the University of British Columbia. Design/methodology/approach – The paper outlines the history, development, and features of OJS, including some of the experimental aspects, as well as early research results and work underway, on which it is based. Findings – OJS (http://pkp.sfu.ca/ojs) is an open source solution to managing and publishing scholarly journals online, which can reduce publishing costs compared to print and other traditional publishing processes. It is a highly flexible editor-operated journal management and publishing system that can be downloaded for free and installed on a local web server. Originality/value – OJS has been designed to reduce the time and energy devoted to the clerical and managerial tasks associated with editing a journal, while improving the record keeping and efficiency of editorial processes. It seeks to improve the scholarly and public quality of journal publishing through a number of innovations, from making journal policies more transparent to improving indexing.}, biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/224f8d3a394f5521d55f314a2e18ca7f7/jsicot}, keywords = {open_journal_system softwares open_source} } @mastersthesis{citeulike:567525, title = {The case for open access publishing, with special reference to open access journals and their prospects in South Africa}, author = {A. Moller}, institution = {Dept of Library and Information Science, University of the Western Cape (South Africa)}, year = 2006, url = {http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00005815/}, id = {567525}, priority = {2}, abstract = {Open access publishing is an initiative that aims to provide universal, unrestricted free access to full-text scholarly materials via the Internet. This presents a radically different approach to the dissemination of research articles that has traditionally been controlled by the publishing enterprise that regulates access by means of subscriptions and licences fees levied on users, predominantly academic libraries. In presenting the case for open access publishing, the thesis explores the contemporary research environment, changing modes of knowledge production, the problems associated with the existing academic journal system, and the subsequent growth of the open access movement as an intervention to reclaim scientific communication. It highlights the ways in which open access better answers the requirements of researchers, funders, governments, and society more broadly. Free access to publicly funded scientific research is more democratic and is necessary for knowledge dissemination and production in a knowledge economy, particularly for developing countries such as South Africa. Attention is drawn to the ways that open access intersects with the ethical norms guiding the practice of research, with the idea of information as a public good, and with other parallel initiatives that resist the enclosure of knowledge through excessive copyright legislation.}, biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/294502f92d9e6a940caed606379a113fa/jsicot}, keywords = {open_journal_system open_access} } @unpublished{citeulike:1444830, title = {Développer les usages en ligne : de l'éditeur électronique au lecteur. Le cas de Revues.org}, author = {Marin Dacos and Nancy Murzilli and Secondat}, year = 2005, url = {http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00004659/en/}, id = {1444830}, priority = {0}, biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a8f490d4101eaa013f18f05fcef5fccb/jsicot}, keywords = {edition_electronique_ouverte} } @unpublished{citeulike:1610679, title = {Publishing Open-Access Journals}, author = {Public L. Plos}, month = {February}, year = 2004, url = {http://www.plos.org/downloads/oa_whitepaper.pdf?issn1683-5506link}, id = {1610679}, priority = {2}, biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c72e506e76569dbdb6d444879b2bb62d/jsicot}, keywords = {open_journal_system open_access} }