@article{Willfort_Willfort_2007,
        title = {Der genetische Code des persönlichen Erfolgs},
        author = {Renate Willfort and Reinhard Willfort},
        journal = {wissensmanagement online},
        month = {October},
        year = 2007,
        url = {http://www.wissensmanagement.net/online/archiv/2007/10_2007/code.shtml},
        abstract = {Wissensarbeiter haben meist sehr klare Vorstellungen von der persönlichen Zukunft, die stark durch Lernen und Informationsverarbeitung geprägt ist. Aus Sicht von Unternehmen wird es daher in Zukunft immer wichtiger werden, dass die persönliche rote Leitlinie eines Wissensarbeiters mit der Unternehmensstrategie zusammenpasst. Wer das ignoriert, läuft Gefahr, dass erfolgskritisches Wissen abhanden kommt, um dann beim Mitbewerb wirksam zu werden. „Wissensarbeit“ ermöglicht und fördert aber auch neue Formen der Erwerbstätigkeit ohne fixe Zughörigkeit zu einer Organisation und lässt vor allem Privat- und Berufsleben zunehmend verschmelzen. Der Ruf nach „Work Life Balance“ kommt daher vor allem von Wissensarbeitern.},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ab50c2df1eb50ef949835d2ec22b01ac/bluedolphin},
	keywords = {knowledge_management knowledge_network social_network competence}
}

@book{Brown_Duguid_2002,
        title = {The Social Life of Information},
        author = {John S. Brown and Paul Duguid},
        howpublished = {Paperback},
        month = {February},
        publisher = {{Harvard Business School Press}},
        year = 2002,
        url = {http://books.google.com/books?id=43wOVWLCCKYC&pg=PP1&ots=S3R2Ye8AFZ&dq=The+Social+Life+of+Information.&hl=de&sig=6X3p4uJFVL3Dgo4tPqkg4YJyoA4#PPP1,M1},
        isbn = {1578517087},
	description = {The Social Life of Information},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2487609d049a4725559d029bbd67228b9/bluedolphin},
	keywords = {information social knowledge_management}
}

@article{Macgregor_McCulloch,
        title = {Collaborative Tagging as a Knowledge Organisation and Resource Discovery Tool},
        author = {George Macgregor and Emma McCulloch},
        journal = {Library Review},
        number = 5,
        pages = {291-300},
        volume = 55,
        year = 2006,
        url = {http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00005703/01/CollaborativeTaggingToolPaperGmEm_preprint.pdf},
        issn = {0024-2535},
	abstract = {Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to provide an overview of the collaborative tagging phenomenon and explore some of
the reasons for its emergence. The paper reviews the related literature and discusses some of the problems associated with,
and the potential of, collaborative tagging approaches for knowledge organisation and general resource discovery.
Design/methodology/approach – A definition of controlled vocabularies is proposed and used to assess the efficacy of
collaborative tagging. An exposition of the collaborative tagging model is provided and a review of the major contributions to
the tagging literature is presented.
Findings – There are numerous difficulties with collaborative tagging systems (e.g. low precision, lack of collocation, etc.)
that originate from the absence of properties that characterise controlled vocabularies. However, such systems can not be
dismissed. Librarians and information professionals have lessons to learn from the interactive and social aspects exemplified
by collaborative tagging systems, as well as their success in engaging users with information management. The future coexistence
of controlled vocabularies and collaborative tagging is predicted, with each appropriate for use within distinct
information contexts: formal and informal.
Research limitations/implications – Librarians and information professional researchers should be taking a lead role in
research aimed at assessing the efficacy of collaborative tagging in relation to information storage, organisation, and
retrieval, and to influence the future development of collaborative tagging systems.
Practical implications – The paper indicates clear areas where digital libraries and repositories could innovate in order to
better engage users with information.
Originality/value – At time of writing there were no literature reviews summarising the main contributions to the
collaborative tagging research or debate.},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26a029cd66313caefd86d941712faacb6/bluedolphin},
	keywords = {information_retrieval vocabulary tagging knowledge_management folksonomy}
}

@article{Tanaka_Taylor_1991,
        title = {Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder?},
        author = {James W. Tanaka and Majorie Taylor},
        journal = {Cognitve Psychology},
        month = {July},
        number = 3,
        pages = {457--482},
        volume = 23,
        year = 1991,
        issn = {0010-0285},
	abstract = {	Categorizing performance of 12 expert and 12 novice subjects was compared in 3 experiments for feature listing; object naming; and category verification. In all, 15 dog experts and 16 bird experts participated. Implications for research concerning the basic level for categorizing objects are discussed.},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2adde9b180d6ab41a6437bb0eda296e20/bluedolphin},
	keywords = {knowledge_management psychology classification cognition analysis comparison}
}

@inproceedings{Schmidt_2005,
        title = {Knowledge Maturing and the Continuity of Context as a Unifying Concept for Knowledge Management and E-Learning},
        author = {Andreas Schmidt},
        booktitle = {Proceedings of I-KNOW '05, Special Track on Integrating Working and Learning},
        month = {July/August},
        year = 2005,
        location = {Graz, Austria},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b9c072b027427ffc520c752c4ab87bf8/bluedolphin},
	keywords = {elearning knowledge_work knowledge_management context_aware}
}

@inproceedings{Schaffert_2006,
        title = {IkeWiki: A Semantic Wiki for Collaborative Knowledge Management},
        address = {Manchester, UK},
        author = {Sebastian Schaffert},
        booktitle = {1st International Workshop on Semantic Technologies in Collaborative Applications (STICA'06)},
        month = {June},
        year = 2006,
        url = {http://www.wastl.net/download/paper/schaffert06_ikewiki.pdf},
        abstract = {This article describes the architecture and design principles of IkeWiki, a Semantic Wiki we developed at Salzburg
Research. Outstanding features of IkeWiki are its support
for collaborative knowledge engineering, its ease of use, its
support for different levels of formalisation ranging from
informal texts to formal ontologies, and its sophisticated,
interactive user interface. While IkeWiki has been developed
primarily as a tool for ontology engineering, it can be used in a variety of application scenarios. We briefly present some of these at the end of the article.},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b27b3ee80186b840ac65d3983c83bc4b/bluedolphin},
	keywords = {collaboration semantic_web knowledge_management wiki ontology}
}

@article{Raman_et_al_2005,
        title = {Designing Knowledge Management Systems for Teaching and Learning with Wiki Technology},
        author = {Murali Raman and Terry Ryan and Lorne Olfman},
        journal = {Journal of Information Systems Education,},
        number = 1,
        volume = 2005,
        year = 2005,
        url = {http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4041/is_200510/ai_n15715725},
        abstract = {A wiki is a group collaboration software tool based on Web server technology. This paper examines the use of a wiki to facilitate knowledge management in an academic setting. We present a case study about how a wiki was used to support collaborative activities in a knowledge management class at a graduate-level information systems and technology school. Our findings suggest that wikis can support collaborative knowledge creation and sharing in an academic environment. Success in attempts to provide such support may depend on: familiarity with wiki technology, careful planning for implementation and use, appropriate class size, and motivation of students to engage in discovery learning.},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26cdf14d244a595b40467222a9646a8b6/bluedolphin},
	keywords = {elearning knowledge_management learning wiki}
}

@article{Uren_et_al_2006,
        title = {Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art},
        author = {Victoria Uren and Philipp Cimiano and Jose Iria and Siegfried Handschuh and Maria Vargas-Vera and Enrico Motta and Fabio Ciravegna},
        journal = {Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web},
        month = {January},
        number = 1,
        pages = {14--28},
        volume = 4,
        year = 2006,
        url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2005.10.002},
        id = {754433},
	priority = {4},
	doi = {10.1016/j.websem.2005.10.002},
	abstract = {While much of a company's knowledge can be found in text repositories, current content management systems have limited capabilities for structuring and interpreting documents. In the emerging Semantic Web, search, interpretation and aggregation can be addressed by ontology-based semantic mark-up. In this paper, we examine semantic annotation, identify a number of requirements, and review the current generation of semantic annotation systems. This analysis shows that, while there is still some way to go before semantic annotation tools will be able to address fully all the knowledge management needs, research in the area is active and making good progress.},
	biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d528303a8365b104ad89d58c514ebd04/bluedolphin},
	keywords = {annotation tools semantics article knowledge_management survey ontology}
}