%0 Journal Article %1 Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska2009 %A Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska, Malgorzata %A Dudarewicz, Adam %A Waszkowska, Malgorzata %A Sliwinska-Kowalska, Mariola %D 2009 %J Journal of low frequency noise, vibration and active control %K Low annoyance exposure, frequency noise, occupational %P 1-17 %T Annoyance Related to Low Frequency Noise in Subjective Assessment of Workers %V 28 %X The aim of this study was to assess annoyance related to low frequency noise (LFN) in employees of the control rooms and office-like areas.Subjects were 276 workers, aged 26-62 years, exposed to noise at A-weighted sound pressure level (SPL) of 41-66 dB. They were asked to assess noise annoyance at their workplace using a 100 point graphical scale. The subjective ratings were compared with various noise metrics and objective evaluations based on proposed LFN exposure criteria for occupational settings.There was a difference in annoyance assessment related to noise with and without (or with less prominent) low frequency content. Low frequency noise was rated as more annoying even though it was at lower dBA levels.Among the noise metrics, the low frequency A-weighted SPL yielded the highest correlation with subjective evaluations of LFN. There was also a quite good agreement between individual annoyance ratings and limit excesses corresponding to preliminary Swedish and Polish exposure criteria.

@article{Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska2009, abstract = {The aim of this study was to assess annoyance related to low frequency noise (LFN) in employees of the control rooms and office-like areas.Subjects were 276 workers, aged 26-62 years, exposed to noise at A-weighted sound pressure level (SPL) of 41-66 dB. They were asked to assess noise annoyance at their workplace using a 100 point graphical scale. The subjective ratings were compared with various noise metrics and objective evaluations based on proposed LFN exposure criteria for occupational settings.There was a difference in annoyance assessment related to noise with and without (or with less prominent) low frequency content. Low frequency noise was rated as more annoying even though it was at lower dBA levels.Among the noise metrics, the low frequency A-weighted SPL yielded the highest correlation with subjective evaluations of LFN. There was also a quite good agreement between individual annoyance ratings and limit excesses corresponding to preliminary Swedish and Polish exposure criteria.}, added-at = {2012-01-27T14:10:42.000+0100}, author = {Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska, Malgorzata and Dudarewicz, Adam and Waszkowska, Malgorzata and Sliwinska-Kowalska, Mariola}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2dc62fc60cac0d5ff316af812b966f290/muhe}, file = {Annoyance Related to Low Frequency Noise in Subjective Assessment of Workers.PDF:2009\\Annoyance Related to Low Frequency Noise in Subjective Assessment of Workers.PDF:PDF}, interhash = {47d6455917d249b117793013c7ac2db2}, intrahash = {dc62fc60cac0d5ff316af812b966f290}, journal = {Journal of low frequency noise, vibration and active control}, keywords = {Low annoyance exposure, frequency noise, occupational}, owner = {Mu}, pages = {1-17}, timestamp = {2012-01-27T14:11:05.000+0100}, title = {Annoyance Related to Low Frequency Noise in Subjective Assessment of Workers}, volume = 28, year = 2009 }