BibSonomy :: bibtex  ::

tag user group author concept BibTeX key search:all search:flawed
A blue social bookmark and publication sharing system.
tags · relations · groups · popular
help · blog · about
login · register
flawed's BibTeX entry:  

Using “Annotator Rationales” to Improve Machine Learning for Text Categorization

Proceedings of NAACL HLT, : 260--267, 2007.
Authors: O.F. Zaidan and J. Eisner and C.D. Piatko
Description: user gets queried for significant (word) features
Tags: classification text
Abstract: We propose a new framework for supervised machine learning. Our goal is to learn from smaller amounts of supervised training data, by collecting a richer kind of training data: annotations with “rationales.” When annotating an example, the human teacher will also highlight evidence supporting this annotation—thereby teaching the machine learner why the example belongs to the category. We provide some rationale-annotated data and present a learning method that exploits the rationales during training to boost performance significantly on a sample task, namely sentiment classification of movie reviews. We hypothesize that in some situations, providing rationales is a more fruitful use of an annotator’s time than annotating more examples.
| BibTeX  
@article{zaidan2007uar,
title = {{Using “Annotator Rationales” to Improve Machine Learning for Text Categorization}},
author = {O.F. Zaidan and J. Eisner and C.D. Piatko},
journal = {Proceedings of NAACL HLT},
pages = {260--267},
year = {2007},
description = {user gets queried for significant (word) features},
abstract = {We propose a new framework for supervised machine learning. Our goal is to learn from smaller amounts of supervised training data, by collecting a richer kind of training data: annotations with “rationales.” When annotating an example, the human teacher will also highlight evidence supporting this annotation—thereby teaching the machine learner why the example belongs to the category. We provide some rationale-annotated data and present a learning method that exploits the rationales during training to boost performance significantly on a sample task, namely sentiment classification of movie reviews. We hypothesize that in some situations, providing rationales is a more fruitful use of an annotator’s time than annotating more examples.},
keywords = {classification text }
}