BACKGROUND\r\nThe authors compared the safety and efficacy of a newly developed fast-track concept at their center, including implementation of a direct admission postanesthetic care unit, to standard perioperative management.\r\nMETHODS\r\nAll fast-track patients treated within the first 6 months of implementation of our direct admission postanesthetic care unit were matched via propensity scores and compared with a historical control group of patients who underwent cardiac surgery prior to fast-track implementation.\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 421 fast-track patients were matched successfully to 421 control patients. The two groups of patients had a similar age (64 +/- 13 vs. 64 +/- 12 yr for fast-track vs. control, P = 0.45) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation-predicted risk of mortality (4.8 +/- 6.1\% vs. 4.6 +/- 5.1\%, P = 0.97). Fast-track patients had significantly shorter times to extubation (75 min 45-110 vs. 900 min 600-1140), as well as shorter lengths of stay in the postanesthetic or intensive care unit (4 h 3.0-5 vs. 20 h 16-25), intermediate care unit (21 h 17-39 vs. 26 h 19-49), and hospital (10 days 8-12 vs. 11 days 9-14) (expressed as median and interquartile range, all P < 0.01). Fast-track patients also had a lower risk of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (0.5\% vs. 2.9\%, P < 0.05) and mortality (0.5\% vs. 3.3\%, P < 0.01).\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe Leipzig fast-track protocol is a safe and effective method to manage cardiac surgery patients after a variety of operations.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Ender.2008
%A Ender, Joerg
%A Borger, Michael Andrew
%A Scholz, Markus
%A Funkat, Anne-Kathrin
%A Anwar, Nadeem
%A Sommer, Marcus
%A Mohr, Friedrich Wilhelm
%A Fassl, Jens
%D 2008
%J Anesthesiology
%K Aged Anesthesia_Recovery_Period Female Humans Length_of_Stay/trends Male Middle_Aged Postoperative_Care/methods/trends Recovery_Room/trends Thoracic_Surgery/trends Time_Factors
%N 1
%P 61–66
%T Cardiac surgery fast-track treatment in a postanesthetic care unit: six-month results of the Leipzig fast-track concept
%V 109
%X BACKGROUND\r\nThe authors compared the safety and efficacy of a newly developed fast-track concept at their center, including implementation of a direct admission postanesthetic care unit, to standard perioperative management.\r\nMETHODS\r\nAll fast-track patients treated within the first 6 months of implementation of our direct admission postanesthetic care unit were matched via propensity scores and compared with a historical control group of patients who underwent cardiac surgery prior to fast-track implementation.\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 421 fast-track patients were matched successfully to 421 control patients. The two groups of patients had a similar age (64 +/- 13 vs. 64 +/- 12 yr for fast-track vs. control, P = 0.45) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation-predicted risk of mortality (4.8 +/- 6.1\% vs. 4.6 +/- 5.1\%, P = 0.97). Fast-track patients had significantly shorter times to extubation (75 min 45-110 vs. 900 min 600-1140), as well as shorter lengths of stay in the postanesthetic or intensive care unit (4 h 3.0-5 vs. 20 h 16-25), intermediate care unit (21 h 17-39 vs. 26 h 19-49), and hospital (10 days 8-12 vs. 11 days 9-14) (expressed as median and interquartile range, all P < 0.01). Fast-track patients also had a lower risk of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (0.5\% vs. 2.9\%, P < 0.05) and mortality (0.5\% vs. 3.3\%, P < 0.01).\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe Leipzig fast-track protocol is a safe and effective method to manage cardiac surgery patients after a variety of operations.
@article{Ender.2008,
abstract = {BACKGROUND\r\nThe authors compared the safety and efficacy of a newly developed fast-track concept at their center, including implementation of a direct admission postanesthetic care unit, to standard perioperative management.\r\nMETHODS\r\nAll fast-track patients treated within the first 6 months of implementation of our direct admission postanesthetic care unit were matched via propensity scores and compared with a historical control group of patients who underwent cardiac surgery prior to fast-track implementation.\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 421 fast-track patients were matched successfully to 421 control patients. The two groups of patients had a similar age (64 +/- 13 vs. 64 +/- 12 yr for fast-track vs. control, P = 0.45) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation-predicted risk of mortality (4.8 +/- 6.1\% vs. 4.6 +/- 5.1\%, P = 0.97). Fast-track patients had significantly shorter times to extubation (75 min [45-110] vs. 900 min [600-1140]), as well as shorter lengths of stay in the postanesthetic or intensive care unit (4 h [3.0-5] vs. 20 h [16-25]), intermediate care unit (21 h [17-39] vs. 26 h [19-49]), and hospital (10 days [8-12] vs. 11 days [9-14]) (expressed as median and interquartile range, all P < 0.01). Fast-track patients also had a lower risk of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (0.5\% vs. 2.9\%, P < 0.05) and mortality (0.5\% vs. 3.3\%, P < 0.01).\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe Leipzig fast-track protocol is a safe and effective method to manage cardiac surgery patients after a variety of operations.},
added-at = {2014-10-15T15:03:44.000+0200},
author = {Ender, Joerg and Borger, Michael Andrew and Scholz, Markus and Funkat, Anne-Kathrin and Anwar, Nadeem and Sommer, Marcus and Mohr, Friedrich Wilhelm and Fassl, Jens},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20859ca247649c14225be55acde691c27/drtester},
interhash = {ddc0cef39ac7172c4c4d72e0919c7057},
intrahash = {0859ca247649c14225be55acde691c27},
journal = {Anesthesiology},
keywords = {Aged Anesthesia_Recovery_Period Female Humans Length_of_Stay/trends Male Middle_Aged Postoperative_Care/methods/trends Recovery_Room/trends Thoracic_Surgery/trends Time_Factors},
number = 1,
pages = {61–66},
timestamp = {2014-10-15T15:03:44.000+0200},
title = {Cardiac surgery fast-track treatment in a postanesthetic care unit: six-month results of the Leipzig fast-track concept},
volume = 109,
year = 2008
}