BibSonomy :: bibtex  ::

tag user group author concept BibTeX key search:all search:flint63
A blue social bookmark and publication sharing system.
tags · relations · groups · popular
help · blog · about
login · register
flint63's BibTeX entry:  

An Overview of Evaluation Methods in TREC Ad Hoc Information Retrieval and TREC Question Answering

Evaluation of Text and Speech Systems, 37: 163-186, 2007.
Authors: Simone Teufel
Editors: Laila Dybkjær and Holmer Hemsen and Wolfgang Minker
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5817-2_6
Tags: ai answer information language paper processing retrieval springer v0805
Abstract: This chapter gives an overview of the current evaluation strategies and problems in the fields of information retrieval (IR) and question answering (QA), as instantiated in the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC). Whereas IR has a long tradition as a task, QA is a relatively new task which had to quickly develop its evaluation metrics, based on experiences gained in IR. This chapter will contrast the two tasks, their difficulties, and their evaluation metrics. We will end this chapter by pointing out limitations of the current evaluation strategies and potential future developments.
| URL | BibTeX  
@incollection{Teufel07p163,
title = {An Overview of Evaluation Methods in {TREC} Ad Hoc Information Retrieval and {TREC} Question Answering},
address = {Dordrecht},
author = {Simone Teufel},
booktitle = {Evaluation of Text and Speech Systems},
editor = {Laila Dybkjær and Holmer Hemsen and Wolfgang Minker},
pages = {163-186},
publisher = {Springer},
series = {Text, Speech and Language Technology},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5817-2_6},
volume = {37},
year = {2007},
abstract = {This chapter gives an overview of the current evaluation strategies and problems in the fields of information retrieval (IR) and question answering (QA), as instantiated in the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC). Whereas IR has a long tradition as a task, QA is a relatively new task which had to quickly develop its evaluation metrics, based on experiences gained in IR. This chapter will contrast the two tasks, their difficulties, and their evaluation metrics. We will end this chapter by pointing out limitations of the current evaluation strategies and potential future developments.},
timestamp = {2008.05.01}, isbn = {978-1-4020-5815-8}, owner = {flint},
keywords = {ai answer information language paper processing retrieval springer v0805 }
}