Ontology Revision as Non-Prioritized Belief Revision
M. Mazzieri, and A. Dragoni. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Emergent Semantics and Ontology Evolution (ESOE2007) at ISWC/ASWC2007, Busan, South Korea, (November 2007)
Abstract
Ontology revision is the process of managing an ontology when a new axiom or fact would render it inconsistent. So far, the AGM approach to belief revision has been adapted to work with ontologies. However, when multiple sources are contributing uncertain knowledge about a static domain, an approach that doesn't give priority to incoming information and allows to recover previously discarded axioms is more suited.
We describe an ontology revision framework that links symbolic and numerical techniques to allow the consistent evolution of an ontology from the contributions of multiple potentially unreliable sources.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 Mazzieri/2007/Ontology
%A Mazzieri, Mauro
%A Dragoni, Aldo Franco
%B Proceedings of the International Workshop on Emergent Semantics and Ontology Evolution (ESOE2007) at ISWC/ASWC2007, Busan, South Korea
%D 2007
%E Haase, Peter
%E Hotho, Andreas
%E Chen, Luke
%E Ong, Ernie
%E Mauroux, Philippe Cudre
%K 2007 belief iswc ontology revision workshop_esoe
%T Ontology Revision as Non-Prioritized Belief Revision
%X Ontology revision is the process of managing an ontology when a new axiom or fact would render it inconsistent. So far, the AGM approach to belief revision has been adapted to work with ontologies. However, when multiple sources are contributing uncertain knowledge about a static domain, an approach that doesn't give priority to incoming information and allows to recover previously discarded axioms is more suited.
We describe an ontology revision framework that links symbolic and numerical techniques to allow the consistent evolution of an ontology from the contributions of multiple potentially unreliable sources.
@inproceedings{Mazzieri/2007/Ontology,
abstract = {Ontology revision is the process of managing an ontology when a new axiom or fact would render it inconsistent. So far, the AGM approach to belief revision has been adapted to work with ontologies. However, when multiple sources are contributing uncertain knowledge about a static domain, an approach that doesn't give priority to incoming information and allows to recover previously discarded axioms is more suited.
We describe an ontology revision framework that links symbolic and numerical techniques to allow the consistent evolution of an ontology from the contributions of multiple potentially unreliable sources.},
added-at = {2007-11-07T19:17:05.000+0100},
author = {Mazzieri, Mauro and Dragoni, Aldo Franco},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22b02ecfd77b4e1e7dcffc8f7f0766ec9/iswc2007},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Emergent Semantics and Ontology Evolution (ESOE2007) at ISWC/ASWC2007, Busan, South Korea},
crossref = {http://data.semanticweb.org/workshop/esoe/2007/proceedings},
editor = {Haase, Peter and Hotho, Andreas and Chen, Luke and Ong, Ernie and Mauroux, Philippe Cudre},
interhash = {3d773b712d9feb9d4dcb622ea6e4681b},
intrahash = {2b02ecfd77b4e1e7dcffc8f7f0766ec9},
keywords = {2007 belief iswc ontology revision workshop_esoe},
month = {November},
timestamp = {2007-11-07T19:20:52.000+0100},
title = {Ontology Revision as Non-Prioritized Belief Revision},
year = 2007
}