BibSonomy :: publication :: Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping

Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping

Jeffrey D. Karpicke, and Janell R. Blunt. Science 331(6018):772--775 (Jan 20, 2011)

Abstract

Educators rely heavily on learning activities that encourage elaborative studying, while activities that require students to practice retrieving and reconstructing knowledge are used less frequently. Here, we show that practicing retrieval produces greater gains in meaningful learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. The advantage of retrieval practice generalized across texts identical to those commonly found in science education. The advantage of retrieval practice was observed with test questions that assessed comprehension and required students to make inferences. The advantage of retrieval practice occurred even when the criterial test involved creating concept maps. Our findings support the theory that retrieval practice enhances learning by retrieval-specific mechanisms rather than by elaborative study processes. Retrieval practice is an effective tool to promote conceptual learning about science.

Links and resources

DOI:10.1126/science.1199327
URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
BibTeX key:Karpicke11
internal link:
?
You can use this internal link to create references to this post in your discussions. Just copy this internal link and paste it in your discussion text.
search on:

Comments or reviews  
(0)

There is no review or comment yet. You can write one!

Tags

  • Last update 2 years and 11 months ago
  • Created 2 years and 11 months ago

Cite this publication