It is important for science to be accessible, not only for the researchers themselves and for scientific education but also for society as a whole and for ‘the citizen’.
• Making ‘green’ or ‘gold’ open access mandatory will greatly boost the move- ment towards open access.
• There are major differences between the disciplines.
• In some disciplines, open access is not an issue because researchers publish
their work in open access repositories.
• The quality of publications has the highest priority, and open access does
not in itself offer any guarantee for quality.
• Research assessment is still too heavily based on closed access leading
journals with a high impact factor.
• The charges associated with open access publishing are still too high for
researchers, and the process is often cumbersome.
• There is a great deal of uncertainty regarding the requirements and pos-
sibilities of open access.
%0 Report
%1 knaw2016opening
%A KNAW,
%C Amsterdam
%D 2016
%K report open_access
%T Opening the Book on Open Access: What Researchers Think
%U https://www.knaw.nl/en/news/publications/opening-the-book-on-open-access#
%X It is important for science to be accessible, not only for the researchers themselves and for scientific education but also for society as a whole and for ‘the citizen’.
• Making ‘green’ or ‘gold’ open access mandatory will greatly boost the move- ment towards open access.
• There are major differences between the disciplines.
• In some disciplines, open access is not an issue because researchers publish
their work in open access repositories.
• The quality of publications has the highest priority, and open access does
not in itself offer any guarantee for quality.
• Research assessment is still too heavily based on closed access leading
journals with a high impact factor.
• The charges associated with open access publishing are still too high for
researchers, and the process is often cumbersome.
• There is a great deal of uncertainty regarding the requirements and pos-
sibilities of open access.
@techreport{knaw2016opening,
abstract = {It is important for science to be accessible, not only for the researchers themselves and for scientific education but also for society as a whole and for ‘the citizen’.
• Making ‘green’ or ‘gold’ open access mandatory will greatly boost the move- ment towards open access.
• There are major differences between the disciplines.
• In some disciplines, open access is not an issue because researchers publish
their work in open access repositories.
• The quality of publications has the highest priority, and open access does
not in itself offer any guarantee for quality.
• Research assessment is still too heavily based on closed access leading
journals with a high impact factor.
• The charges associated with open access publishing are still too high for
researchers, and the process is often cumbersome.
• There is a great deal of uncertainty regarding the requirements and pos-
sibilities of open access.},
added-at = {2016-06-07T02:32:34.000+0200},
address = {Amsterdam},
author = {KNAW},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23aa3109af9a101b02478c1edc0912bc5/isaric1},
description = {ISBN: 978-90-6984-705-4},
institution = {KNAW},
interhash = {158e66fb3855a27be2d5e00ff1d6dd6f},
intrahash = {3aa3109af9a101b02478c1edc0912bc5},
keywords = {report open_access},
timestamp = {2016-06-07T07:01:57.000+0200},
title = {Opening the Book on Open Access: What Researchers Think},
type = {Publication},
url = {https://www.knaw.nl/en/news/publications/opening-the-book-on-open-access#},
year = 2016
}