Drawing on histories of technological innovation originating from research by faculty at The Pennsylvania State University and Johns Hopkins University, this paper presents evidence for a “technology” as well as an “intellectual property rights” research approach to the commercialization of academic patents. By describing how inventor and firm activities and strategies affect the technical development and commercial positioning of university patents, a technology focus adds depth to the general proposition that university patents are embryonic technologies. It likewise serves as an analytical probe to reconsider other mainstream propositions about university technology transfer.
:Users/Miguel/Dropbox/Escola/Artigos/Feller, Feldman\_2009\_The commercialization of academic patents black boxes, pipelines, and Rubik’s cubes.pdf:pdf
%0 Journal Article
%1 Feller2009
%A Feller, Irwin
%A Feldman, Maryann
%D 2009
%J The Journal of Technology Transfer
%K Academic and licenses,Technology research,Commercialization,Patents transfer
%N 6
%P 597--616
%R 10.1007/s10961-009-9123-5
%T The commercialization of academic patents: black boxes, pipelines, and Rubik’s cubes
%U http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10961-009-9123-5
%V 35
%X Drawing on histories of technological innovation originating from research by faculty at The Pennsylvania State University and Johns Hopkins University, this paper presents evidence for a “technology” as well as an “intellectual property rights” research approach to the commercialization of academic patents. By describing how inventor and firm activities and strategies affect the technical development and commercial positioning of university patents, a technology focus adds depth to the general proposition that university patents are embryonic technologies. It likewise serves as an analytical probe to reconsider other mainstream propositions about university technology transfer.
%@ 1096100991
@article{Feller2009,
abstract = {Drawing on histories of technological innovation originating from research by faculty at The Pennsylvania State University and Johns Hopkins University, this paper presents evidence for a “technology” as well as an “intellectual property rights” research approach to the commercialization of academic patents. By describing how inventor and firm activities and strategies affect the technical development and commercial positioning of university patents, a technology focus adds depth to the general proposition that university patents are embryonic technologies. It likewise serves as an analytical probe to reconsider other mainstream propositions about university technology transfer.},
added-at = {2012-02-27T06:11:36.000+0100},
author = {Feller, Irwin and Feldman, Maryann},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/257a746d6f7955d2adc8679b646afc983/kamil205},
doi = {10.1007/s10961-009-9123-5},
file = {:Users/Miguel/Dropbox/Escola/Artigos/Feller, Feldman\_2009\_The commercialization of academic patents black boxes, pipelines, and Rubik’s cubes.pdf:pdf},
interhash = {7cc6fa2896267120b15f6844cc4c99cb},
intrahash = {57a746d6f7955d2adc8679b646afc983},
isbn = {1096100991},
issn = {0892-9912},
journal = {The Journal of Technology Transfer},
keywords = {Academic and licenses,Technology research,Commercialization,Patents transfer},
month = may,
number = 6,
pages = {597--616},
timestamp = {2012-02-27T06:11:38.000+0100},
title = {{The commercialization of academic patents: black boxes, pipelines, and Rubik’s cubes}},
url = {http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10961-009-9123-5},
volume = 35,
year = 2009
}