OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of a 66-item version of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) to assess the gross motor functions of children <3 yrs old with cerebral palsy. DESIGN: 298 valid samples were obtained from 171 children with cerebral palsy (male 126, female 45, mean age 19 mos, age range 3-36 mos) measured with GMFM-88. Then a 73-item version of GMFM (GMFM-73) special for these children was obtained by Rasch analysis. GMFM-66 score and GMFM-73 scores of each sample were obtained. The reliability and validity of GMFM-66 were evaluated by analyzing the correlation between the scores and between the change scores of these two GMFM versions. The relative precision of GMFM-73 vs. GMFM-66 was also analyzed. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability and interscorer reliability of GMFM-66 were both high. The ICC scores were 0.9666 and 0.9782, respectively. Significant correlations were found between the scores (r = 0.9848, P < 0.001) and between the change scores (r = 0.8700, P < 0.001) of these two versions of GMFM. A 14\% less gain in relative precision was achieved when using GMFM-73 vs. GMFM-66. CONCLUSION: Results indicated that the GMFM-66 had good reliability and validity in assessing the gross motor functions of children <3 yrs old with cerebral palsy. The GMFM-73 derived in the present study did not function significantly better for young children than GMFM-66.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Wei2006
%A Wei, Shi
%A Su-Juan, Wang
%A Yuan-Gui, Liao
%A Hong, Yang
%A Xiu-Juan, Xu
%A Xiao-Mei, Shao
%D 2006
%J Am J Phys Med Rehabil
%K Cerebral Palsy; Child, Preschool; Disability Evaluation; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Motor Skills; Reproducibility of Results
%N 2
%P 141--147
%T Reliability and validity of the GMFM-66 in 0- to 3-year-old children with cerebral palsy.
%V 85
%X OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of a 66-item version of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) to assess the gross motor functions of children <3 yrs old with cerebral palsy. DESIGN: 298 valid samples were obtained from 171 children with cerebral palsy (male 126, female 45, mean age 19 mos, age range 3-36 mos) measured with GMFM-88. Then a 73-item version of GMFM (GMFM-73) special for these children was obtained by Rasch analysis. GMFM-66 score and GMFM-73 scores of each sample were obtained. The reliability and validity of GMFM-66 were evaluated by analyzing the correlation between the scores and between the change scores of these two GMFM versions. The relative precision of GMFM-73 vs. GMFM-66 was also analyzed. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability and interscorer reliability of GMFM-66 were both high. The ICC scores were 0.9666 and 0.9782, respectively. Significant correlations were found between the scores (r = 0.9848, P < 0.001) and between the change scores (r = 0.8700, P < 0.001) of these two versions of GMFM. A 14\% less gain in relative precision was achieved when using GMFM-73 vs. GMFM-66. CONCLUSION: Results indicated that the GMFM-66 had good reliability and validity in assessing the gross motor functions of children <3 yrs old with cerebral palsy. The GMFM-73 derived in the present study did not function significantly better for young children than GMFM-66.
@article{Wei2006,
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of a 66-item version of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) to assess the gross motor functions of children <3 yrs old with cerebral palsy. DESIGN: 298 valid samples were obtained from 171 children with cerebral palsy (male 126, female 45, mean age 19 mos, age range 3-36 mos) measured with GMFM-88. Then a 73-item version of GMFM (GMFM-73) special for these children was obtained by Rasch analysis. GMFM-66 score and GMFM-73 scores of each sample were obtained. The reliability and validity of GMFM-66 were evaluated by analyzing the correlation between the scores and between the change scores of these two GMFM versions. The relative precision of GMFM-73 vs. GMFM-66 was also analyzed. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability and interscorer reliability of GMFM-66 were both high. The ICC scores were 0.9666 and 0.9782, respectively. Significant correlations were found between the scores (r = 0.9848, P < 0.001) and between the change scores (r = 0.8700, P < 0.001) of these two versions of GMFM. A 14\% less gain in relative precision was achieved when using GMFM-73 vs. GMFM-66. CONCLUSION: Results indicated that the GMFM-66 had good reliability and validity in assessing the gross motor functions of children <3 yrs old with cerebral palsy. The GMFM-73 derived in the present study did not function significantly better for young children than GMFM-66.},
added-at = {2014-07-19T21:54:24.000+0200},
author = {Wei, Shi and Su-Juan, Wang and Yuan-Gui, Liao and Hong, Yang and Xiu-Juan, Xu and Xiao-Mei, Shao},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26665509678369cbec148dc69f20f55c3/ar0berts},
groups = {public},
interhash = {5569a67b265fd1c53cd594f33f7e3208},
intrahash = {6665509678369cbec148dc69f20f55c3},
journal = {Am J Phys Med Rehabil},
keywords = {Cerebral Palsy; Child, Preschool; Disability Evaluation; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Motor Skills; Reproducibility of Results},
month = Feb,
number = 2,
pages = {141--147},
pii = {00002060-200602000-00006},
pmid = {16428905},
timestamp = {2014-07-19T21:54:24.000+0200},
title = {Reliability and validity of the GMFM-66 in 0- to 3-year-old children with cerebral palsy.},
username = {ar0berts},
volume = 85,
year = 2006
}