A Comparison of Pseudo-paper and Paper Prototyping Methods for Mobile Evaluations
J. Lumsden, and R. Maclean. Proceedings of the OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: 2008 Workshops: ADI, AWeSoMe, COMBEK, EI2N, IWSSA, MONET, OnToContent + QSI, ORM, PerSys, RDDS, SEMELS, and SWWS, page 538--547. Monterrey, Mexico, Springer-Verlag, (2008)
Abstract
The research presented in this paper is part of an ongoing investigation into how best to support meaningful lab-based usability evaluations of mobile technologies. In particular, we report on a comparative study of (a) a standard paper prototype of a mobile application used to perform an early-phase seated (static) usability evaluation, and (b) a pseudo-paper prototype created from the paper prototype used to perform an early-phase,contextually-relevant, mobile usability evaluation. We draw some initial conclusions regarding whether it is worth the added effort of conducting a usability evaluation of a pseudo-paper prototype in a contextually-relevant setting during early-phase user interface development.
Proceedings of the OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: 2008 Workshops: ADI, AWeSoMe, COMBEK, EI2N, IWSSA, MONET, OnToContent + QSI, ORM, PerSys, RDDS, SEMELS, and SWWS
%0 Conference Paper
%1 lumsden_comparison_2008
%A Lumsden, Joanna
%A Maclean, Ryan
%B Proceedings of the OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: 2008 Workshops: ADI, AWeSoMe, COMBEK, EI2N, IWSSA, MONET, OnToContent + QSI, ORM, PerSys, RDDS, SEMELS, and SWWS
%C Monterrey, Mexico
%D 2008
%I Springer-Verlag
%K evaluations, lab-based mobile paper prototyping technology, usability
%P 538--547
%T A Comparison of Pseudo-paper and Paper Prototyping Methods for Mobile Evaluations
%U http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1484528&dl=ACM&coll=portal&CFID=94769811&CFTOKEN=34489764
%X The research presented in this paper is part of an ongoing investigation into how best to support meaningful lab-based usability evaluations of mobile technologies. In particular, we report on a comparative study of (a) a standard paper prototype of a mobile application used to perform an early-phase seated (static) usability evaluation, and (b) a pseudo-paper prototype created from the paper prototype used to perform an early-phase,contextually-relevant, mobile usability evaluation. We draw some initial conclusions regarding whether it is worth the added effort of conducting a usability evaluation of a pseudo-paper prototype in a contextually-relevant setting during early-phase user interface development.
%@ 978-3-540-88874-1
@inproceedings{lumsden_comparison_2008,
abstract = {The research presented in this paper is part of an ongoing investigation into how best to support meaningful lab-based usability evaluations of mobile technologies. In particular, we report on a comparative study of (a) a standard paper prototype of a mobile application used to perform an early-phase seated (static) usability evaluation, and (b) a pseudo-paper prototype created from the paper prototype used to perform an early-phase,contextually-relevant, mobile usability evaluation. We draw some initial conclusions regarding whether it is worth the added effort of conducting a usability evaluation of a pseudo-paper prototype in a contextually-relevant setting during early-phase user interface development.},
added-at = {2012-02-24T12:38:24.000+0100},
address = {Monterrey, Mexico},
author = {Lumsden, Joanna and Maclean, Ryan},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/266c162e0d1de06dc54de0b8d8ffc67f5/ewomant},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the {OTM} Confederated International Workshops and Posters on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: 2008 Workshops: {ADI}, {AWeSoMe}, {COMBEK}, {EI2N}, {IWSSA}, {MONET}, {OnToContent} + {QSI}, {ORM}, {PerSys}, {RDDS}, {SEMELS}, and {SWWS}},
interhash = {99adef758abbdddef371e8f8480f5bd7},
intrahash = {66c162e0d1de06dc54de0b8d8ffc67f5},
isbn = {978-3-540-88874-1},
keywords = {evaluations, lab-based mobile paper prototyping technology, usability},
pages = {538--547},
publisher = {{Springer-Verlag}},
timestamp = {2012-02-24T12:38:28.000+0100},
title = {A Comparison of Pseudo-paper and Paper Prototyping Methods for Mobile Evaluations},
url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1484528&dl=ACM&coll=portal&CFID=94769811&CFTOKEN=34489764},
year = 2008
}