In previous papers, some of us predicted the end of öne size fits all" as a commercial relational DBMS paradigm. These papers presented reasons and experimental evidence that showed that the major RDBMS vendors can be outperformed by 1-2 orders of magnitude by specialized engines in the data warehouse, stream processing, text, and scientific database markets. Assuming that specialized engines dominate these markets over time, the current relational DBMS code lines will be left with the business data processing (OLTP) market and hybrid markets where more than one kind of capability is required. In this paper we show that current RDBMSs can be beaten by nearly two orders of magnitude in the OLTP market as well. The experimental evidence comes from comparing a new OLTP prototype, H-Store, which we have built at M.I.T. to a popular RDBMS on the standard transactional benchmark, TPC-C. We conclude that the current RDBMS code lines, while attempting to be a öne size fits all" solution, in fact, excel at nothing. Hence, they are 25 year old legacy code lines that should be retired in favor of a collection of "from scratch" specialized engines. The DBMS vendors (and the research community) should start with a clean sheet of paper and design systems for tomorrow's requirements, not continue to push code lines and architectures designed for yesterday's needs.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 Stonebraker2007
%A Stonebraker, Michael
%A Madden, Samuel
%A Abadi, Daniel J.
%A Harizopoulos, Stavros
%A Hachem, Nabil
%A Helland, Pat
%B Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB)
%C Vienna
%D 2007
%E Koch, Christoph
%E Gehrke, Johannes
%E Garofalakis, Minos N.
%E Srivastava, Divesh
%E Aberer, Karl
%E Deshpande, Anand
%E Florescu, Daniela
%E Chan, Chee Yong
%E Ganti, Venkatesh
%E Kanne, Carl-Christian
%E Klas, Wolfgang
%E Neuhold, Erich J.
%I ACM Press
%K databases nosql vldb
%P 1150-1160
%T The End of an Architectural Era (It's Time for a Complete Rewrite)
%U http://www.vldb.org/conf/2007/papers/industrial/p1150-stonebraker.pdf
%X In previous papers, some of us predicted the end of öne size fits all" as a commercial relational DBMS paradigm. These papers presented reasons and experimental evidence that showed that the major RDBMS vendors can be outperformed by 1-2 orders of magnitude by specialized engines in the data warehouse, stream processing, text, and scientific database markets. Assuming that specialized engines dominate these markets over time, the current relational DBMS code lines will be left with the business data processing (OLTP) market and hybrid markets where more than one kind of capability is required. In this paper we show that current RDBMSs can be beaten by nearly two orders of magnitude in the OLTP market as well. The experimental evidence comes from comparing a new OLTP prototype, H-Store, which we have built at M.I.T. to a popular RDBMS on the standard transactional benchmark, TPC-C. We conclude that the current RDBMS code lines, while attempting to be a öne size fits all" solution, in fact, excel at nothing. Hence, they are 25 year old legacy code lines that should be retired in favor of a collection of "from scratch" specialized engines. The DBMS vendors (and the research community) should start with a clean sheet of paper and design systems for tomorrow's requirements, not continue to push code lines and architectures designed for yesterday's needs.
@inproceedings{Stonebraker2007,
abstract = {In previous papers, some of us predicted the end of "one size fits all" as a commercial relational DBMS paradigm. These papers presented reasons and experimental evidence that showed that the major RDBMS vendors can be outperformed by 1-2 orders of magnitude by specialized engines in the data warehouse, stream processing, text, and scientific database markets. Assuming that specialized engines dominate these markets over time, the current relational DBMS code lines will be left with the business data processing (OLTP) market and hybrid markets where more than one kind of capability is required. In this paper we show that current RDBMSs can be beaten by nearly two orders of magnitude in the OLTP market as well. The experimental evidence comes from comparing a new OLTP prototype, H-Store, which we have built at M.I.T. to a popular RDBMS on the standard transactional benchmark, TPC-C. We conclude that the current RDBMS code lines, while attempting to be a "one size fits all" solution, in fact, excel at nothing. Hence, they are 25 year old legacy code lines that should be retired in favor of a collection of "from scratch" specialized engines. The DBMS vendors (and the research community) should start with a clean sheet of paper and design systems for tomorrow's requirements, not continue to push code lines and architectures designed for yesterday's needs.},
added-at = {2010-09-24T00:42:24.000+0200},
address = {Vienna},
author = {Stonebraker, Michael and Madden, Samuel and Abadi, Daniel J. and Harizopoulos, Stavros and Hachem, Nabil and Helland, Pat},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27473d5370cc8e712f5cb88f4c98e5aba/voj},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB)},
editor = {Koch, Christoph and Gehrke, Johannes and Garofalakis, Minos N. and Srivastava, Divesh and Aberer, Karl and Deshpande, Anand and Florescu, Daniela and Chan, Chee Yong and Ganti, Venkatesh and Kanne, Carl-Christian and Klas, Wolfgang and Neuhold, Erich J.},
interhash = {8e873654f46cb01a905225de4ee3fe17},
intrahash = {7473d5370cc8e712f5cb88f4c98e5aba},
keywords = {databases nosql vldb},
month = {9},
pages = {1150-1160},
publisher = {ACM Press},
timestamp = {2010-09-24T00:42:24.000+0200},
title = {The End of an Architectural Era (It's Time for a Complete Rewrite)},
url = {http://www.vldb.org/conf/2007/papers/industrial/p1150-stonebraker.pdf},
year = 2007
}