%0 Journal Article %1 Lorenzetti2013 %A Lorenzetti, Diane L %A Ghali, William A %D 2013 %J BMC medical research methodology %K Bibliography Collection,Documentation,Humans,Meta-Analysis Literature Topic,Data Topic,Review Topic,Software,Software: \& as data numerical statistics %N 1 %P 141 %R 10.1186/1471-2288-13-141 %T Reference management software for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an exploration of usage and usability. %U http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84887524629&partnerID=tZOtx3y1 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/13/141 %V 13 %X BACKGROUND: Reference management software programs enable researchers to more easily organize and manage large volumes of references typically identified during the production of systematic reviews. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which authors are using reference management software to produce systematic reviews; identify which programs are used most frequently and rate their ease of use; and assess the degree to which software usage is documented in published studies. METHODS: We reviewed the full text of systematic reviews published in core clinical journals indexed in ACP Journal Club from 2008 to November 2011 to determine the extent to which reference management software usage is reported in published reviews. We surveyed corresponding authors to verify and supplement information in published reports, and gather frequency and ease-of-use data on individual reference management programs. RESULTS: Of the 78 researchers who responded to our survey, 79.5\% reported that they had used a reference management software package to prepare their review. Of these, 4.8\% reported this usage in their published studies. EndNote, Reference Manager, and RefWorks were the programs of choice for more than 98\% of authors who used this software. Comments with respect to ease-of-use issues focused on the integration of this software with other programs and computer interfaces, and the sharing of reference databases among researchers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite underreporting of use, reference management software is frequently adopted by authors of systematic reviews. The transparency, reproducibility and quality of systematic reviews may be enhanced through increased reporting of reference management software usage.

@article{Lorenzetti2013, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Reference management software programs enable researchers to more easily organize and manage large volumes of references typically identified during the production of systematic reviews. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which authors are using reference management software to produce systematic reviews; identify which programs are used most frequently and rate their ease of use; and assess the degree to which software usage is documented in published studies. METHODS: We reviewed the full text of systematic reviews published in core clinical journals indexed in ACP Journal Club from 2008 to November 2011 to determine the extent to which reference management software usage is reported in published reviews. We surveyed corresponding authors to verify and supplement information in published reports, and gather frequency and ease-of-use data on individual reference management programs. RESULTS: Of the 78 researchers who responded to our survey, 79.5\% reported that they had used a reference management software package to prepare their review. Of these, 4.8\% reported this usage in their published studies. EndNote, Reference Manager, and RefWorks were the programs of choice for more than 98\% of authors who used this software. Comments with respect to ease-of-use issues focused on the integration of this software with other programs and computer interfaces, and the sharing of reference databases among researchers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite underreporting of use, reference management software is frequently adopted by authors of systematic reviews. The transparency, reproducibility and quality of systematic reviews may be enhanced through increased reporting of reference management software usage.}, added-at = {2015-08-30T16:19:45.000+0200}, author = {Lorenzetti, Diane L and Ghali, William A}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2eebe88c454ca4c86525670460edbadd9/refmansoftware}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2288-13-141}, file = {:home/jesus/.local/share/data/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Lorenzetti, Ghali - 2013 - Reference management software for systematic reviews and meta-analyses an exploration of usage and usabili(2).pdf:pdf}, interhash = {27e33163c01914d3d9e968f563862ec7}, intrahash = {eebe88c454ca4c86525670460edbadd9}, issn = {1471-2288}, journal = {BMC medical research methodology}, keywords = {Bibliography Collection,Documentation,Humans,Meta-Analysis Literature Topic,Data Topic,Review Topic,Software,Software: \& as data numerical statistics}, month = jan, number = 1, pages = 141, pmid = {24237877}, timestamp = {2015-08-30T16:19:45.000+0200}, title = {{Reference management software for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an exploration of usage and usability.}}, url = {http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84887524629\&partnerID=tZOtx3y1 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/13/141}, volume = 13, year = 2013 }