BibSonomy :: publication ::

tag user group author concept BibTeX key search:all search:neilernst

The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system.

(0)

This publication has not been reviewed yet.

rating distribution

average user rating

The average rating is computed over all reviews. However, some of them may be invisible to you due to the visibility setting chosen by the reviewers.

(0.0 of 5.0 based on 0 reviews)

Comparing GORE Frameworks: i-star and KAOS

by: Vera Maria Bejamim Werneck, Antonio de Padua Albuquerque Oliveira, and Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite

In: Ibero-American Workshop of Engineering of Requirements Val Paraiso, Chile: (July 2009) .

Abstract

Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering GORE is an approach to requirements engineering dealing with intentionality in accordance with the relations among different actors. KAOS and i* i-star frameworks have been receiving many references as being important GORE proposals. This paper presents an conceptual analysis comparing characteristics of those methods giving examples related to actors’ relations definition, goal organizational model, tasks representation, risk analysis, and non-functional requirements. The aim of this work is to show both frameworks benefits and drawbacks. We believe that this analysis helps the understanding of the core concepts of GORE as well as it draws attention to key representation issues for both KAOS and i*.

BibTeX record

@inproceedings{werneck09wer,
  abstract = {Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering (GORE) 
is an approach to requirements engineering dealing with intentionality in accordance with the relations among different actors. KAOS and i* (i-star) frameworks have been receiving many references as being important GORE proposals. This paper presents an conceptual analysis comparing characteristics of those methods giving examples related to actors’ relations definition, goal organizational model, tasks 
representation, risk analysis, and non-functional requirements. The aim of this work is to show both frameworks benefits and drawbacks. We believe that this analysis helps the understanding of the core concepts of GORE as well as it draws attention to key representation issues for both KAOS and i*.},
  added-at = {2009-06-30T17:48:42.000+0200},
  address = {Val Paraiso, Chile},
  author = {Werneck, Vera Maria Bejamim and de Padua Albuquerque Oliveira, Antonio and do Prado Leite, Julio Cesar Sampaio},
  biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/283d17e1465e9951b7ac313c66ee2fcb6/neilernst},
  booktitle = {Ibero-American Workshop of Engineering of Requirements},
  interhash = {ba7e17986cc659c2042ff37db074e83d},
  intrahash = {83d17e1465e9951b7ac313c66ee2fcb6},
  keywords = {i-star kaos requirements},
  month = {July},
  timestamp = {2009-06-30T17:48:42.000+0200},
  title = {Comparing GORE Frameworks: i-star and KAOS   },
  year = 2009
}

Endnote record

%0 Conference Paper
%1 werneck09wer
%A Werneck, Vera Maria Bejamim
%A de Padua Albuquerque Oliveira, Antonio
%A do Prado Leite, Julio Cesar Sampaio
%B Ibero-American Workshop of Engineering of Requirements
%C Val Paraiso, Chile
%D 2009
%K 
%T Comparing GORE Frameworks: i-star and KAOS   
%X Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering (GORE) 
is an approach to requirements engineering dealing with intentionality in accordance with the relations among different actors. KAOS and i* (i-star) frameworks have been receiving many references as being important GORE proposals. This paper presents an conceptual analysis comparing characteristics of those methods giving examples related to actors’ relations definition, goal organizational model, tasks 
representation, risk analysis, and non-functional requirements. The aim of this work is to show both frameworks benefits and drawbacks. We believe that this analysis helps the understanding of the core concepts of GORE as well as it draws attention to key representation issues for both KAOS and i*.