Periodic bimanual movements are often the focus of studies of the
basic organizational principles of human actions. In such movements
there is a typical spontaneous tendency towards mirror symmetry.
Even involuntary slips from asymmetrical movement patterns into symmetry
occur, but not vice versa. Traditionally, this phenomenon has been
interpreted as a tendency towards co-activation of homologous muscles,
probably originating in motoric neuronal structures. Here we provide
evidence contrary to this widespread assumption. We show for two
prominent experimental models bimanual finger oscillation and bimanual
four-finger tapping that the symmetry bias is actually towards spatial,
perceptual symmetry, without regard to the muscles involved. We suggest
that spontaneous coordination phenomena of this kind are purely perceptual
in nature. In the case of a bimanual circling model, our findings
reveal that highly complex, even `impossible' movements can easily
be performed with only simple visual feedback. A `motoric' representation
of the performed perceptual oscillation patterns is not necessary.
Thus there is no need to translate such a `motoric' into a `perceptual'
representation or vice versa, using `internal models' (ref. 29).
We suggest that voluntary movements are organized by way of a representation
of the perceptual goals, whereas the corresponding motor activity,
of sometimes high complexity, is spontaneously and exibly tuned in.
Bimanuelle Bewegungen werden perceptuel koordiniert. Beispiel Zeigefinger
hin und her bewegen, Tapping, Kurbel drehen usw. Wenn die visuelle
Komponente der Bewegung passt, können rein motorisch auch sehr merkwürdie
BEwegungen gemacht werden, was sonst nie gehen würde.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Mechsner:2001
%A Mechsner, Franz
%A Kerzel, Dirk
%A Knoblich, Günther
%A Prinz, Wolfgang
%D 2001
%J Nature
%K bimanual coordination, movements movements, parallel perception, symmetric
%N 6859
%P 69-73
%T Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination
%V 414
%X Periodic bimanual movements are often the focus of studies of the
basic organizational principles of human actions. In such movements
there is a typical spontaneous tendency towards mirror symmetry.
Even involuntary slips from asymmetrical movement patterns into symmetry
occur, but not vice versa. Traditionally, this phenomenon has been
interpreted as a tendency towards co-activation of homologous muscles,
probably originating in motoric neuronal structures. Here we provide
evidence contrary to this widespread assumption. We show for two
prominent experimental models bimanual finger oscillation and bimanual
four-finger tapping that the symmetry bias is actually towards spatial,
perceptual symmetry, without regard to the muscles involved. We suggest
that spontaneous coordination phenomena of this kind are purely perceptual
in nature. In the case of a bimanual circling model, our findings
reveal that highly complex, even `impossible' movements can easily
be performed with only simple visual feedback. A `motoric' representation
of the performed perceptual oscillation patterns is not necessary.
Thus there is no need to translate such a `motoric' into a `perceptual'
representation or vice versa, using `internal models' (ref. 29).
We suggest that voluntary movements are organized by way of a representation
of the perceptual goals, whereas the corresponding motor activity,
of sometimes high complexity, is spontaneously and exibly tuned in.
@article{Mechsner:2001,
abstract = {Periodic bimanual movements are often the focus of studies of the
basic organizational principles of human actions. In such movements
there is a typical spontaneous tendency towards mirror symmetry.
Even involuntary slips from asymmetrical movement patterns into symmetry
occur, but not vice versa. Traditionally, this phenomenon has been
interpreted as a tendency towards co-activation of homologous muscles,
probably originating in motoric neuronal structures. Here we provide
evidence contrary to this widespread assumption. We show for two
prominent experimental models bimanual finger oscillation and bimanual
four-finger tapping that the symmetry bias is actually towards spatial,
perceptual symmetry, without regard to the muscles involved. We suggest
that spontaneous coordination phenomena of this kind are purely perceptual
in nature. In the case of a bimanual circling model, our findings
reveal that highly complex, even `impossible' movements can easily
be performed with only simple visual feedback. A `motoric' representation
of the performed perceptual oscillation patterns is not necessary.
Thus there is no need to translate such a `motoric' into a `perceptual'
representation or vice versa, using `internal models' (ref. 29).
We suggest that voluntary movements are organized by way of a representation
of the perceptual goals, whereas the corresponding motor activity,
of sometimes high complexity, is spontaneously and exibly tuned in.},
added-at = {2009-06-26T15:25:19.000+0200},
author = {Mechsner, Franz and Kerzel, Dirk and Knoblich, G{\"u}nther and Prinz, Wolfgang},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b399bc887bb5311ff25a55340f952db9/butz},
comment = {Bimanuelle Bewegungen werden perceptuel koordiniert. Beispiel Zeigefinger
hin und her bewegen, Tapping, Kurbel drehen usw. Wenn die visuelle
Komponente der Bewegung passt, können rein motorisch auch sehr merkwürdie
BEwegungen gemacht werden, was sonst nie gehen würde.},
description = {diverse cognitive systems bib},
interhash = {1ae0d352b3e372e2adeb0d2f8af096e6},
intrahash = {b399bc887bb5311ff25a55340f952db9},
journal = {Nature},
keywords = {bimanual coordination, movements movements, parallel perception, symmetric},
number = 6859,
owner = {martin},
pages = {69-73},
timestamp = {2009-06-26T15:25:47.000+0200},
title = {Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination},
volume = 414,
year = 2001
}