BibSonomy :: publication ::

tag user group author concept BibTeX key search:all search:yish

The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system.

entry of yish and 1 other user:

(0)

This publication has not been reviewed yet.

rating distribution

average user rating

The average rating is computed over all reviews. However, some of them may be invisible to you due to the visibility setting chosen by the reviewers.

(0.0 of 5.0 based on 0 reviews)

Design principles for online peer-evaluation: Fostering objectivity

by: Yael Kali, and Miki Ronen

In: Computer support for collaborative learning: The Next 10 Years! Proceedings of CSCL 2005 Taipei, Taiwan Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2005) .

Resources (URL, PDF, PS...)

URL:	http://css.cscl2005.org/DownloadFile.aspx?p=169

Peer-evaluation is a powerful method for fostering learning in a variety of contexts. Yet challenges of application in contexts involving personal values received little attention. This study used a design-based research approach to explore such challenges in an undergraduate educational-philosophy course. The study was organized in three design-and-implementation iterations of a peer evaluation activity. Discrepancies between student and instructor scores were explained by bias due to non-objective student personal stands. Refinements to the design, based on emerging design principles a assisted students to better differentiate between objective criteria and personal opinions, b increased learning gains, and c decreased tensions between different cultural groups.

BibTeX record

@inproceedings{Kali05,
  abstract = {Peer-evaluation is a powerful method for fostering learning in a variety of contexts. Yet challenges of application in contexts involving personal values received little attention. This study used a design-based research approach to explore such challenges in an undergraduate educational-philosophy course. The study was organized in three design-and-implementation iterations of a peer evaluation activity. Discrepancies between student and instructor scores were explained by bias due to non-objective student personal stands. Refinements to the design, based on emerging design principles a) assisted students to better differentiate between objective criteria and personal opinions, b) increased learning gains, and c) decreased tensions between different cultural groups.},
  added-at = {2008-09-05T01:04:05.000+0200},
  address = {Mahwah, NJ},
  author = {Kali, Yael and Ronen, Miki},
  biburl = {http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2cda40a05c96ced0a70c86c55d09eadc2/yish},
  booktitle = {Computer support for collaborative learning: The Next 10 Years! Proceedings of CSCL 2005 (Taipei, Taiwan)},
  citeulike-article-id = {519589},
  editor = {Koschmann, T. and Suthers, D. D.},
  interhash = {1cc56a7e5024bab2dfecd3a4a4bc692d},
  intrahash = {cda40a05c96ced0a70c86c55d09eadc2},
  keywords = {CERME-6-patterns KalDesignResearch WLEFormativeEassessment cal09-patterns design designpatterns designprinciples eLPBookMor emdp haifa-edtech learning mathgamespatterns research},
  priority = {2},
  publisher = {Lawrence Erlbaum Associates},
  timestamp = {2008-09-05T01:04:05.000+0200},
  title = {Design principles for online peer-evaluation: Fostering objectivity},
  url = {http://css.cscl2005.org/DownloadFile.aspx?p=169},
  year = 2005
}

Endnote record

%0 Conference Paper
%1 Kali05
%A Kali, Yael
%A Ronen, Miki
%B Computer support for collaborative learning: The Next 10 Years! Proceedings of CSCL 2005 (Taipei, Taiwan)
%C Mahwah, NJ
%D 2005
%E Koschmann, T.
%E Suthers, D. D.
%I Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
%K 
%T Design principles for online peer-evaluation: Fostering objectivity
%U http://css.cscl2005.org/DownloadFile.aspx?p=169
%X Peer-evaluation is a powerful method for fostering learning in a variety of contexts. Yet challenges of application in contexts involving personal values received little attention. This study used a design-based research approach to explore such challenges in an undergraduate educational-philosophy course. The study was organized in three design-and-implementation iterations of a peer evaluation activity. Discrepancies between student and instructor scores were explained by bias due to non-objective student personal stands. Refinements to the design, based on emerging design principles a) assisted students to better differentiate between objective criteria and personal opinions, b) increased learning gains, and c) decreased tensions between different cultural groups.

BibSonomy :: publication ::

Design principles for online peer-evaluation: Fostering objectivity

Resources (URL, PDF, PS...)

Abstract

BibTeX record

Endnote record