BibSonomy :: bibtex  ::

tag user group author concept BibTeX key search:all search:avs
A blue social bookmark and publication sharing system.
tags · relations · groups · popular
help · blog · about
login · register
avs's BibTeX entry:  

Historiographie chretienne et romanesque: Le De mortibus persecutorum de Lactance (250-325 ap. J.C.)

Vigiliae Christianae, 59(2): 135--151, 2005.
Authors: B. Colot
Tags: Historiographie
Abstract: The DMP written by Lactantius and published after the ‘Edict of Milan’ (313), is an unclassifiable book. It was regarded as the first Christian historiography in latin but recent study has defended that the first was really the H.E. by Eusebius which was translated in latin at the end of the IVth century. We have analysed the romantic character of Lactantius’ narration through emotional, existential features and its narrative movement. We have compared the prologues of the two books and managed to show that the DMP is surely a Christian history, authentic in many aspects, but discredited in favour of the « canonic » historiography by Eusebius which, even if it contains features of fiction too, is closer to the historic resuppositions of today’s readers.
| BibTeX  
@article{Colot05,
title = {Historiographie chretienne et romanesque: Le De mortibus persecutorum de Lactance (250-325 ap. J.C.)},
author = {B. Colot},
journal = {Vigiliae Christianae},
number = {2},
pages = {135--151},
volume = {59},
year = {2005},
abstract = {The DMP written by Lactantius and published after the ‘Edict of Milan’ (313), is an unclassifiable book. It was regarded as the first Christian historiography in latin but recent study has defended that the first was really the H.E. by Eusebius which was translated in latin at the end of the IVth century. We have analysed the romantic character of Lactantius’ narration through emotional, existential features and its narrative movement. We have compared the prologues of the two books and managed to show that the DMP is surely a Christian history, authentic in many aspects, but discredited in favour of the « canonic » historiography by Eusebius which, even if it contains features of fiction too, is closer to the historic resuppositions of today’s readers.},
lastdatemodified = {2005-09-23}, lastname = {Colot}, pdf = {Colot05.2.p135.pdf}, own = {notown}, read = {notread},
keywords = {Historiographie }
}