%0 Journal Article %1 link_model_2006 %A Link, William A. %A Barker, Richard J. %D 2006 %J Ecology %K AIC, BIC, Bayesian averaging, inference, model refutation selection, %N 10 %P 2626--2635 %R 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)872626:MWATFO2.0.CO;2 %T Model weights and the foundations of multimodel inference %V 87 %X Statistical thinking in wildlife biology and ecology has been profoundly influenced by the introduction of AIC (Akaike's information criterion) as a tool for model selection and as a basis for model averaging. In this paper, we advocate the Bayesian paradigm as a broader framework for multimodel inference, one in which model averaging and model selection are naturally linked, and in which the performance of AIC-based tools is naturally evaluated. Prior model weights implicitly associated with the use of AIC are seen to highly favor complex models: in some cases, all but the most highly parameterized models in the model set are virtually ignored a priori. We suggest the usefulness of the weighted BIC (Bayesian information criterion) as a computationally simple alternative to AIC, based on explicit selection of prior model probabilities rather than acceptance of default priors associated with AIC. We note, however, that both procedures are only approximate to the use of exact Bayes factors. We discuss and illustrate technical difficulties associated with Bayes factors, and suggest approaches to avoiding these difficulties in the context of model selection for a logistic regression. Our example highlights the predisposition of AIC weighting to favor complex models and suggests a need for caution in using the BIC for computing approximate posterior model weights.

@article{link_model_2006, abstract = {Statistical thinking in wildlife biology and ecology has been profoundly influenced by the introduction of AIC (Akaike's information criterion) as a tool for model selection and as a basis for model averaging. In this paper, we advocate the Bayesian paradigm as a broader framework for multimodel inference, one in which model averaging and model selection are naturally linked, and in which the performance of AIC-based tools is naturally evaluated. Prior model weights implicitly associated with the use of AIC are seen to highly favor complex models: in some cases, all but the most highly parameterized models in the model set are virtually ignored a priori. We suggest the usefulness of the weighted BIC (Bayesian information criterion) as a computationally simple alternative to AIC, based on explicit selection of prior model probabilities rather than acceptance of default priors associated with AIC. We note, however, that both procedures are only approximate to the use of exact Bayes factors. We discuss and illustrate technical difficulties associated with Bayes factors, and suggest approaches to avoiding these difficulties in the context of model selection for a logistic regression. Our example highlights the predisposition of AIC weighting to favor complex models and suggests a need for caution in using the BIC for computing approximate posterior model weights.}, added-at = {2017-01-09T13:57:26.000+0100}, author = {Link, William A. and Barker, Richard J.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f6b65f704cc2f99a60dae49559154c4b/yourwelcome}, doi = {10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2626:MWATFO]2.0.CO;2}, interhash = {469e5c187a3182642d58a91480073108}, intrahash = {f6b65f704cc2f99a60dae49559154c4b}, issn = {0012-9658}, journal = {Ecology}, keywords = {AIC, BIC, Bayesian averaging, inference, model refutation selection,}, language = {eng}, month = oct, number = 10, pages = {2626--2635}, pmid = {17089670}, timestamp = {2017-01-09T14:01:11.000+0100}, title = {Model weights and the foundations of multimodel inference}, volume = 87, year = 2006 }