BibSonomy :: bibtex  ::

tag user group author concept BibTeX key search:all search:callagialla
A blue social bookmark and publication sharing system.
tags · relations · groups · popular
help · blog · about
login · register
callagialla's BibTeX entry:  

Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical versus Incremental Innovation

Management Science, 30(6): 682-695, 1984.
Authors: John E. Ettlie and William P. Bridges and Robert D. O'Keefe
Tags: COMMERCIAL changePRODUCT costingOrganizational managementSTRATEGIC planningRAPID productsDIRECT prototyping
Abstract: The purpose of this study was W testa model of the organizational innovation process that suggests that the strategy-structure causal sequence is differentiated by radical versus incremental innovation. That is, unique strategy and structure will be required for radical innovation, especially process adoption, while more traditional strategy and structure arrangements tend to support new product introduction and incremental process adoption. This differentiated theory is strongly supported by data from the food processing industry. Specifically, radical process and packaging adoption are significantly promoted by an aggressive technology policy and the concentration of technical specialists. Incremental process adoption and new product introduction tends to be promoted in large, complex, decentralized organizations that have market dominated growth strategies. Findings also suggest that more traditional structural arrangements might be used for radical change initiation if the general tendencies that occur in these dimensions as a result of increasing size can be delayed, briefly modified, or if the organization can be partitioned structurally for radical vs. incremental innovation. In particular, centralization of decision making appears to be necessary for radical process adoption along with the movement away from complexity toward more organizational generalists. This suggests that a greater support of top managers in the innovation process is necessary to initiate and sustain radical departures from the past for that organization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
| BibTeX  
@article{Ettlie.1984,
title = {Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical versus Incremental Innovation},
author = {John E. Ettlie and William P. Bridges and Robert D. O'Keefe},
journal = {Management Science},
number = {6},
pages = {682-695},
volume = {30},
year = {1984},
abstract = {The purpose of this study was W testa model of the organizational innovation process that suggests that the strategy-structure causal sequence is differentiated by radical versus incremental innovation. That is, unique strategy and structure will be required for radical innovation, especially process adoption, while more traditional strategy and structure arrangements tend to support new product introduction and incremental process adoption. This differentiated theory is strongly supported by data from the food processing industry. Specifically, radical process and packaging adoption are significantly promoted by an aggressive technology policy and the concentration of technical specialists. Incremental process adoption and new product introduction tends to be promoted in large, complex, decentralized organizations that have market dominated growth strategies. Findings also suggest that more traditional structural arrangements might be used for radical change initiation if the general tendencies that occur in these dimensions as a result of increasing size can be delayed, briefly modified, or if the organization can be partitioned structurally for radical vs. incremental innovation. In particular, centralization of decision making appears to be necessary for radical process adoption along with the movement away from complexity toward more organizational generalists. This suggests that a greater support of top managers in the innovation process is necessary to initiate and sustain radical departures from the past for that organization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]},
issn = {0025-1909},
keywords = {COMMERCIAL changePRODUCT costingOrganizational managementSTRATEGIC planningRAPID productsDIRECT prototyping }
}