%0 Journal Article %1 Baldini2006c %A Baldini, Nicola %D 2006 %I Beech Tree Publishing %J Research Evaluation %K imported %N 3 %P 197--207 %R 10.3152/147154406781775878 %T University patenting and licensing activity: a review of the literature %U http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/beech/rev/2006/00000015/00000003/art00005?token=005118750257f8de39412f415d7666253e7b2e7b422a5a7b532530482972715a614f6d4e227a598ff %V 15 %X In recent years, there has been a growing view that universities could and should play a larger and more direct role in assisting industry and promoting national competitiveness. This review of the literature on university patenting and licensing activity is based on 125 papers published between 1980 and 2004, which were obtained by querying ABI/INFORM and EconLit using as keywords “university”, “patent”, “license”, “Bayh-Dole”, “triple helix” and by an abstract-by-abstract reading of all issues of 15 scientific journals and the NBER working papers database since 1995. Major findings include that the surge of university patents did not happen at the expense of their quality, nor of the quality of research. Moreover, scientific excellence and technology transfer activities mutually reinforce. Finally, university patenting and related activities need a fertile context to develop both inside and outside the campus. The US success story cannot be imitated by simply changing IP laws and by transferring ownership of IPRs from the inventors to the performing institutions.

@article{Baldini2006c, abstract = {In recent years, there has been a growing view that universities could and should play a larger and more direct role in assisting industry and promoting national competitiveness. This review of the literature on university patenting and licensing activity is based on 125 papers published between 1980 and 2004, which were obtained by querying ABI/INFORM and EconLit using as keywords “university”, “patent”, “license”, “Bayh-Dole”, “triple helix” and by an abstract-by-abstract reading of all issues of 15 scientific journals and the NBER working papers database since 1995. Major findings include that the surge of university patents did not happen at the expense of their quality, nor of the quality of research. Moreover, scientific excellence and technology transfer activities mutually reinforce. Finally, university patenting and related activities need a fertile context to develop both inside and outside the campus. The US success story cannot be imitated by simply changing IP laws and by transferring ownership of IPRs from the inventors to the performing institutions.}, added-at = {2012-02-27T06:11:36.000+0100}, author = {Baldini, Nicola}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25085973fbaaa36fa317f9bc0ab0521f6/kamil205}, doi = {10.3152/147154406781775878}, interhash = {61afaa2c85426826b61a865d2398748e}, intrahash = {5085973fbaaa36fa317f9bc0ab0521f6}, issn = {09582029}, journal = {Research Evaluation}, keywords = {imported}, month = dec, number = 3, pages = {197--207}, publisher = {Beech Tree Publishing}, timestamp = {2012-02-27T06:11:42.000+0100}, title = {{University patenting and licensing activity: a review of the literature}}, url = {http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/beech/rev/2006/00000015/00000003/art00005?token=005118750257f8de39412f415d7666253e7b2e7b422a5a7b532530482972715a614f6d4e227a598ff}, volume = 15, year = 2006 }