Abstract
A large sample of high attaining pupils were given a written proof test in Yr 8 (age
13.5 years) and similar tests in Yrs 9 and 10. We look at their responses to two
number/algebra questions which were designed to assess whether pupils used
empirical or structural reasoning. We found that the use of structural reasoning
increased over the years, albeit at a modest rate, but that the use of empirical
reasoning, in the form of inappropriate number pattern spotting or through the desire
to perform rather than analyse a calculation, was still widespread. However, we also
identified a more advanced use of empirical reasoning, namely to check the validity
of a structural argument.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).