%0 Journal Article %1 hauser_etal:2011 %A Hauser, Juerg %A Dyer, Kathleen M. %A Pasyanos, Michael E. %A Bungum, Hilmar %A Faleide, Jan I. %A Clark, Stephen A. %A Schweitzer, Johannes %D 2011 %J Journal of Geophysical Research %K geophysics seismology %N B1 %P B01303+ %R 10.1029/2010JB007889 %T A probabilistic seismic model for the European Arctic %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007889 %V 116 %X The development of three-dimensional seismic models for the crust and upper mantle has traditionally focused on finding one model that provides the best fit to the data while observing some regularization constraints. In contrast to this, the inversion employed here fits the data in a probabilistic sense and thus provides a quantitative measure of model uncertainty. Our probabilistic model is based on two sources of information: (1) prior information, which is independent from the data, and (2) different geophysical data sets, including thickness constraints, velocity profiles, gravity data, surface wave group velocities, and regional body wave traveltimes. We use a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm to sample models from the prior distribution, the set of plausible models, and test them against the data to generate the posterior distribution, the ensemble of models that fit the data with assigned uncertainties. While being computationally more expensive, such a probabilistic inversion provides a more complete picture of solution space and allows us to combine various data sets. The complex geology of the European Arctic, encompassing oceanic crust, continental shelf regions, rift basins and old cratonic crust, as well as the nonuniform coverage of the region by data with varying degrees of uncertainty, makes it a challenging setting for any imaging technique and, therefore, an ideal environment for demonstrating the practical advantages of a probabilistic approach. Maps of depth to basement and depth to Moho derived from the posterior distribution are in good agreement with previously published maps and interpretations of the regional tectonic setting. The predicted uncertainties, which are as important as the absolute values, correlate well with the variations in data coverage and quality in the region. A practical advantage of our probabilistic model is that it can provide estimates for the uncertainties of observables due to model uncertainties. We will demonstrate how this can be used for the formulation of earthquake location algorithms that take model uncertainties into account when estimating location uncertainties.

@article{hauser_etal:2011, abstract = {The development of three-dimensional seismic models for the crust and upper mantle has traditionally focused on finding one model that provides the best fit to the data while observing some regularization constraints. In contrast to this, the inversion employed here fits the data in a probabilistic sense and thus provides a quantitative measure of model uncertainty. Our probabilistic model is based on two sources of information: (1) prior information, which is independent from the data, and (2) different geophysical data sets, including thickness constraints, velocity profiles, gravity data, surface wave group velocities, and regional body wave traveltimes. We use a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm to sample models from the prior distribution, the set of plausible models, and test them against the data to generate the posterior distribution, the ensemble of models that fit the data with assigned uncertainties. While being computationally more expensive, such a probabilistic inversion provides a more complete picture of solution space and allows us to combine various data sets. The complex geology of the European Arctic, encompassing oceanic crust, continental shelf regions, rift basins and old cratonic crust, as well as the nonuniform coverage of the region by data with varying degrees of uncertainty, makes it a challenging setting for any imaging technique and, therefore, an ideal environment for demonstrating the practical advantages of a probabilistic approach. Maps of depth to basement and depth to Moho derived from the posterior distribution are in good agreement with previously published maps and interpretations of the regional tectonic setting. The predicted uncertainties, which are as important as the absolute values, correlate well with the variations in data coverage and quality in the region. A practical advantage of our probabilistic model is that it can provide estimates for the uncertainties of observables due to model uncertainties. We will demonstrate how this can be used for the formulation of earthquake location algorithms that take model uncertainties into account when estimating location uncertainties.}, added-at = {2012-09-01T13:08:21.000+0200}, author = {Hauser, Juerg and Dyer, Kathleen M. and Pasyanos, Michael E. and Bungum, Hilmar and Faleide, Jan I. and Clark, Stephen A. and Schweitzer, Johannes}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28e1222f32ff41e67b2c2e4f201d97b94/nilsma}, day = 13, doi = {10.1029/2010JB007889}, interhash = {e729149ad983a14918d2e44760b41814}, intrahash = {8e1222f32ff41e67b2c2e4f201d97b94}, issn = {0148-0227}, journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research}, keywords = {geophysics seismology}, month = jan, number = {B1}, pages = {B01303+}, timestamp = {2021-02-09T13:25:23.000+0100}, title = {A probabilistic seismic model for the European Arctic}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007889}, volume = 116, year = 2011 }