<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [
 <!ENTITY rdf 'http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'>
 <!ENTITY rdfs 'http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'>

 <!ENTITY swrc 'http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#'>
 <!ENTITY xsd 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#'>
]>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:burst="http://xmlns.com/burst/0.1/"
 
 xmlns:rdfs="&rdfs;"
 xmlns:swrc="&swrc;"
 xmlns:xsd="&xsd;"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/author/Baldwin/cognition">
  <title>BibSonomy publications for /author/Baldwin/cognition</title>
  <link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/burst/author/Baldwin/cognition</link>
  <description>BibSonomy BuRST Feed for /author/Baldwin/cognition</description>
  <dc:date>2008-07-20T23:24:33+02:00</dc:date>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/27d96d1fb53ca8b70fed1a63842ae440b/neilernst"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
  </items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/27d96d1fb53ca8b70fed1a63842ae440b/neilernst">
    <title>A Comparison of Empirical Study and Cognitive Dimensions Analysis in the Evaluation of UML Diagrams</title>
    <link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27d96d1fb53ca8b70fed1a63842ae440b/neilernst</link>
    <dc:creator>neilernst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-09-19T02:46:18+02:00</dc:date>
    <dc:subject>cognition empirical uml </dc:subject>
    <content:encoded>
	    <![CDATA[
        <div class="block">
	      <div class="bmtitle">

  <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27d96d1fb53ca8b70fed1a63842ae440b/neilernst">A Comparison of Empirical Study and Cognitive Dimensions Analysis in the Evaluation of UML Diagrams</a>
</div>
<div class="bmdesc">
  <span style="color:#555555;"> 
    Maria <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Kutar">Kutar</a>         	     	 
        	  and Carol <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Britton">Britton</a>         	     	 
        	  and Trevor <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Barker">Barker</a>         	     	 
        	 </span> 
  <em>14th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group</em>
    1--14
  (2002)
</div>
<span class="bmmeta">
  
  
        to
        <span class="bmtags">
        <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/neilernst/cognition">cognition</a>
        <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/neilernst/empirical">empirical</a>
        <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/neilernst/uml">uml</a>
        </span>
        

          by <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/neilernst">neilernst</a> 
        
        
        on 2006-09-19 02:46:18 </span></div>
	    ]]>
    </content:encoded>
    <taxo:topics>
      <rdf:Bag>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/cognition" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/empirical" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/uml" />
        </rdf:Bag>
    </taxo:topics>
    <burst:publication>
      <swrc:InProceedings>
        <swrc:booktitle>14th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group</swrc:booktitle><swrc:institution><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Brunel University"/></swrc:institution><swrc:month>June</swrc:month><swrc:pages>1--14</swrc:pages><swrc:title>A Comparison of Empirical Study and Cognitive Dimensions Analysis in the
Evaluation of UML Diagrams</swrc:title><swrc:year>2002</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>cognition empirical uml </swrc:keywords><swrc:date>2006-09-19 02:46:18.0</swrc:date><swrc:abstract>It is important that all those who use representations of a system during the development process can
clearly understand the representations that are used. Research has shown that structure plays an
important role in whether a diagrammatic representation may be readily understood. In this paper we
present the results of a study where two different approaches were taken to the evaluation of two
notations which form part of the UML diagram toolkit: sequence diagrams and collaboration
diagrams. First, a theoretical investigation was carried out using the cognitive dimensions framework.
Second, an empirical study was carried out to investigate user understanding of such diagrams. The
results of the two studies did not concur, with the theoretical approach supporting the original
hypothesis that structure is an important factor in diagram comprehension, but the study providing no
evidence to support this.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField>
    <swrc:Field swrc:key="id" swrc:value="549144"/>
  </swrc:hasExtraField>
<swrc:hasExtraField>
    <swrc:Field swrc:key="priority" swrc:value="4"/>
  </swrc:hasExtraField>
<swrc:author>
  <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Maria Kutar" /></rdf:_1>
  <rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Carol Britton" /></rdf:_2>
  <rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Trevor Barker" /></rdf:_3>
  </rdf:Seq>
</swrc:author>

<swrc:editor>
  <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="J. Kuljis" /></rdf:_1>
  <rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="L. Baldwin" /></rdf:_2>
  <rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="R. Scoble" /></rdf:_3>
  </rdf:Seq>
</swrc:editor></swrc:InProceedings>  
    </burst:publication>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>