http://www.bibsonomy.org/burst/concept/tag/web_2.0BibSonomy BuRST Feed for /concept/tag/web_2.02008-09-05T07:51:14+02:00http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b9a9ed9d2197dce8c4438acb9eb2a49a/hubert3hubert32008-06-24T08:26:13+02:00weblogs e-learning blogs web20 web2.0 web_2.0 Lehren wissensmanagement <span style="color:#555555;">Gabi <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Reinmann">Reinmann</a> </span><em>Information, Wissenschaft und Praxis</em><em>59(1):49-57</em>(<em>2008</em>)Tue Jun 24 08:26:13 CEST 2008Information, Wissenschaft und Praxis149-57Lehren als Wissensarbeit ? Persönliches Wissensmanagement mit Weblogs59 2008weblogs e-learning blogs web20 web2.0 web_2.0 Lehren wissensmanagement http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25e4b1648d15a4218a4b015e929a1d2dd/hubert3hubert32008-06-16T09:59:50+02:00wissenschaftskunde bibliographien schrifttum_wissenschaftliches informationsmanagement web_2.0 <span style="color:#555555;">Astrid <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Teichert">Teichert</a> und Thomas <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Stöber">St&#246;ber</a> </span>(<em>2008</em>)Mon Jun 16 09:59:50 CEST 200817Webbasierte Literaturverwaltung - neue Kooperationsformen und Anwendungsszenarien2008wissenschaftskunde bibliographien schrifttum_wissenschaftliches informationsmanagement web_2.0 http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/248dc14d24f2031833cc226ec69e44d7e/ggraniggrani2008-06-13T17:16:19+02:00discussion wiki web_2.0 presentation <span style="color:#555555;">G. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Granitzer">Granitzer</a> </span><em>November2007. </em>Fri Jun 13 17:16:19 CEST 2008NovemberWeb 2.0 in Unternehmen - Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen2007discussion wiki web_2.0 presentation 22http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22f3577096c884e2ae1d227023eb314e8/ggraniggrani2008-06-13T17:07:15+02:00web_2.0 <span style="color:#555555;"> </span><em>4. </em><em>June2007. </em>Fri Jun 13 17:07:15 CEST 2008wissensmanagement - Das Magazin für FührungskräfteJune4Corporate Web 2.0 – Eine Herausforderung für Unternehmen2007web_2.0 http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26f8dd8da981d547650022c928617e677/ggraniggrani2008-06-13T16:35:21+02:00web_2.0 ontology article folksonomy <span style="color:#555555;">Mathias <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Lux">Lux</a> und Gisela <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Dösinger">D&#246;singer</a> </span><em>nternational Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL)</em><em>3(4/5):515-528</em>(<em>2007</em>) <em>ISSN (Online): 1741-1017 ISSN (Print): 1741-1009 . </em>Fri Jun 13 16:35:21 CEST 2008nternational Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL)ISSN (Online): 1741-1017 ISSN (Print): 1741-10094/5515-528From Folksonomies to Ontologies: Employing Wisdom of the Crowds to Serve Learning Purposes32007web_2.0 ontology article folksonomy Is Web 2.0 just hype or just a buzzword, which might disappear in the near future? One way to find answers to these questions is to investigate the actual benefit of the Web 2.0 for real use cases. Within this contribution we study a very special aspect of the Web 2.0 – the folksonomy – and its use within self-directed learning. Guided by conceptual principles of emergent computing we point out methods, which might be able to let semantics emerge from folksonomies and discuss the effect of the results in self-directed learning.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/242ce7eecb6a5ad5dfa1c598c61b4ee69/ggraniggrani2008-06-13T16:09:04+02:00social_software web_2.0 book <span style="color:#555555;">Andrea <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Back">Back</a> und Norbert <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Gronau">Gronau</a> und Klaus <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Tochtermann">Tochtermann</a> (eds.). </span><em>Oldenbourg Verlag, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Fri Jun 13 16:09:04 CEST 2008Web 2.0 in der Unternehmenspraxis - Grundlagen, Fallstudien und Trends zum Einsatz von Social Softwareapplication oriented book2008social_software web_2.0 book "Die Einführung eines Web 2.0-Lernansatzes in den Universitäten ist ein komplexer Prozess, der bedeutende technologische, betriebliche und menschliche Hindernisse überwinden muss. Aus diesen Gründen ist die Entwicklung von Zielsetzungen und einer von den Führungskräften – und zwar vor allem von denjenigen, die für das Wissensmanagement zuständig sind – akzeptierten und geförderten Strategie unerlässlich. Dieser erste Schritt bedeutet in der Regel tief greifende kulturelle Veränderungen für Menschen, die es gewohnt sind, in anderen Szenarien zu arbeiten und Entscheidungen zu treffen."http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27c418a44ce1b3539de90a23803fd61d8/cirruscirrus2008-05-20T11:09:34+02:00Web_2.0 eLearning <span style="color:#555555;">Juan <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Freire">Freire</a> </span><em>elearningpapers</em><em>April2008. </em>Tue May 20 11:09:34 CEST 2008elearningpapersApril8Universities and Web 2.0: Institutional challenges2008Web_2.0 eLearning The irruption of the Web 2.0 internet in universities does not modify only learning models - organizative models are also challenged, creating important fears among the managers of the institutions. Teachers, researchers and students started some years ago to use social software tools, but in few cases these experiences have allowed any scaling from the individual to the institutional level. The promises and potential of Web 2.0 in universities need an adequate strategy for their development which has to confront the bottlenecks and fears common in these institutions, which could explain the lack of adaptation. Some of the bottlenecks highlighted in this paper are: a) the rejection by the users, personnel and students, b) the lack of an incentive system, c) the available pre-web 2.0 technology, and d) universities show in some cases a culture of aversion to innovation and entrepreneurship. The adoption of a Web 2.0 approach to learning in universities is a complex process confronting important technological, managerial and human barriers. For these reasons, the design of a set of objectives and a strategy accepted and promoted by the managers, especially those in charge of knowledge management, is absolutely needed. This first step requires in many cases radical cultural changes for people used to work and make decisions in a different scenario. The introduction for the Web 2.0 approach to learning in universities must be done through an adaptive strategy, one that may be designed integrating previous experiences of educational, research and business organizations.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a412eda2e397f691b5581e0622c50eeb/cirruscirrus2008-05-19T09:23:05+02:00Web_2.0 search_engine Folksonomies <span style="color:#555555;">Beate <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Krause">Krause</a> und Andreas <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Hotho">Hotho</a> und Gerd <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Stumme">Stumme</a> </span><em>Advances in Information Retrieval, 30th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2008, </em><em>Seite101-113. </em>(<em>2008</em>)Mon May 19 09:23:05 CEST 2008Advances in Information Retrieval, 30th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2008101-113A Comparison of Social Bookmarking with Traditional Search2008Web_2.0 search_engine Folksonomies Social bookmarking systems allow users to store links to internet resources on a web page. As social bookmarking systems are growing in popularity, search algorithms have been developed that transfer the idea of link-based rankings in the Web to a social bookmarking system’s data structure. These rankings differ from traditional search engine rankings in that they incorporate the rating of users. In this study, we compare search in social bookmarking systems with traditionalWeb search. In the first part, we compare the user activity and behaviour in both kinds of systems, as well as the overlap of the underlying sets of URLs. In the second part,we compare graph-based and vector space rankings for social bookmarking systems with commercial search engine rankings. Our experiments are performed on data of the social bookmarking system Del.icio.us and on rankings and log data from Google, MSN, and AOL. We will show that part of the difference between the systems is due to different behaviour (e. g., the concatenation of multi-word lexems to single terms in Del.icio.us), and that real-world events may trigger similar behaviour in both kinds of systems. We will also show that a graph-based ranking approach on folksonomies yields results that are closer to the rankings of the commercial search engines than vector space retrieval, and that the correlation is high in particular for the domains that are well covered by the social bookmarking system.KDubiq Blueprinthttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2566686f518e43c993dc1854dc2b2b5e4/cirruscirrus2008-05-19T09:16:33+02:00Folksonomies Web_2.0 <span style="color:#555555;">Andreas <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Hotho">Hotho</a> und Robert <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Jäschke">J&#228;schke</a> und Christoph <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Schmitz">Schmitz</a> und Gerd <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Stumme">Stumme</a> </span><em>Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference, </em><em>Seite411-426. </em><em>Budva, Montenegro, </em><em>Springer, </em><em>June2006. </em>Mon May 19 09:16:33 CEST 2008Budva, MontenegroProceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference June411-426LNCSInformation Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking2006Folksonomies Web_2.0 http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ad5a2848a67e2970efec9410d7891002/roremm06roremm062008-04-22T17:52:12+02:00Wertschöpfung Web_2.0 Kommunikation lv_crossmedia3 <span style="color:#555555;">Udo Winand Oliver <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Bohl">Bohl</a> </span><em>HMD - Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik</em>(<em>2007</em>)Tue Apr 22 17:52:12 CEST 2008HMD - Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik25527-36Unternehmerische Wertschöpfung im Web 2.02007Wertschöpfung Web_2.0 Kommunikation lv_crossmedia3 Web 2.0-Anwendungen erfreuen sich bei privaten Nutzergruppen einer zunehmenden Beliebtheit. Unternehmen vermissen jedoch eine adäquate Charakterisierung von Potenzialen und Effekten der propagierten Anwendungen auf die unternehmerische Wertschöpfung. Diesem Spannungsfeld nimmt sich der vorliegende Beitrag an. Im Mittelpunkt des Interesses stehen Unternehmen, die Veränderungen ihrer Wertschöpfung durch die Nutzung entsprechender Angebote erwarten. Die Untersuchung umfasst sowohl die interne Wirkung (u.a. durch die zunehmende Vernetzung, die Vereinfachung der Kommunikation, durch Netzwerkeffekte sowie durch die steigende Nutzerbeteiligung) als auch die externen Effekte (Prosumenten, Mashups etc.) des Einsatzes von Web 2.0. Ein wesentliches Ziel ist es, Paradigmen des Web 2.0 durch eine Gegenüberstellung mit generellen Trends, die auf die Wertschöpfung in Unternehmen Einfluss haben, auf ihre Potenziale zur Unterstützung oder zur Konterkarierung dieser Trends hin zu untersuchen. Zu diesem Zweck werden nach einer Definition grundlegender Begriffe wesentliche Trends und ihre Entsprechungen im Web 2.0 anhand dreier Submodelle von Geschäftsmodellen diskutiert. Darauf aufbauend wird detailliert auf Chancen und Risiken der unternehmerischen Anwendung von Web 2.0-Paradigmen eingegangen.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e0c2c1b047991a3c691d8a069bed9c75/roremm06roremm062008-04-22T13:01:16+02:00SOA Konvergenz serviceorientierte_Architektur lv_crossmedia3 Web_2.0 <span style="color:#555555;">Christoph Schroth; Lars <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Kirchhoff">Kirchhoff</a> </span><em>HMD - Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik</em>(<em>2007</em>)Tue Apr 22 13:01:16 CEST 2008HMD - Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik25549-57Web 2.0 und SOA – verwandte Konzepte?2007SOA Konvergenz serviceorientierte_Architektur lv_crossmedia3 Web_2.0 Eine neue Klasse von Internetapplikationen wie interaktive Enzyklopädien, Blogs oder auch sogenannte Mashups hat während der letzten Jahre große Verbreitung gefunden und wird oft unter dem Begriff Web 2.0 zusammengefasst. Ein Thema, das seit kurzer Zeit diskutiert wird, ist der Zusammenhang zwischen Web 2.0 und dem Konzept der serviceorientierten Architektur (SOA). Der Gedanke der Wiederverwendbarkeit und des Verbergens von Komplexität, aber auch das lose Koppeln verschiedener Dienste hat die wissenschaftliche Gemeinschaft angeregt, Gemeinsamkeiten zwischen Web 2.0 und SOA herauszuarbeiten. In dieser Arbeit werden Anwendungsbeispiele der beiden Konzepte sowohl aus technischer als auch aus betriebswirtschaftlicher Perspektive untersucht und auf der Basis von sieben Kriterien kontrastiert. Die detaillierte Analyse soll dabei Unterschiede wie auch Gemeinsamkeiten aufdecken und schließlich einen Ausblick auf zukünftige Applikationen, die auf Technologien und Gestaltungsprinzipien von sowohl Web 2.0 als auch SOA aufbauen, geben.CLEEhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/277a510c31198971ac721dacf65243be5/xckukxckuk2008-04-12T22:06:45+02:00dCoP Distributed_Community_of_Practice Networks Virtual_Working Continuing_Professional_Development Open_University Part_Time_Working Higher_Education On-line_Communities Networked_Communities Teaching_Associates Web_2.0 Distance_Tutors CPD <span style="color:#555555;">Janet <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Macdonald">Macdonald</a> und Anne <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Hewling">Hewling</a> </span><em>Communities of Practice: Creating Learning Environments for Educators, </em><em>2, </em><em>chapter 5, </em><em>Information Age Publishing, </em><em>Charlotte, NC, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Sat Apr 12 22:06:45 CEST 2008Charlotte, NCCommunities of Practice: Creating Learning Environments for Educators589--106Exploring the Potential of Online Communities of Practice for Distance Tutors22008dCoP Distributed_Community_of_Practice Networks Virtual_Working Continuing_Professional_Development Open_University Part_Time_Working Higher_Education On-line_Communities Networked_Communities Teaching_Associates Web_2.0 Distance_Tutors CPD As the name implies, distance tutors commonly work away from campus and rarely have the opportunity for ongoing support and informal development such as that enjoyed by campus based staff. In this context there is much potential in making provision for the development of online communities. This chapter describes three case studies of the establishment and evaluation of online Communities of Practice (CoPs) at the Open University (UK). CoPs are in use both as a central part of course related professional development, and for wider pedagogical issues. Platforms in use include online forums, which support online discussion, and new wiki environments, which also offer the potential for extending the use of CoPs to the development and sharing of resources. The variety of ways in which CoPs are in use are described, the major factors which contribute to their success, and the social and institutional challenges to sharing and developing resources within a community.CLEEhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22467ef2c509b1f6fded3749f864fd3e6/xckukxckuk2008-04-12T22:06:45+02:00Higher_Education Wiki Web_2.0 Professional_Education Blended_Programme Podcasting Threaded_Discussion Tapped-In Chat Social_Computing Graduate_Education Blog <span style="color:#555555;">Linda <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Polin">Polin</a> </span><em>Communities of Practice: Creating Learning Envronments for Educators, </em><em>2, </em><em>chapter 13, </em><em>Information Age Publishing, </em><em>Charlotte, NC, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Sat Apr 12 22:06:45 CEST 2008Charlotte, NCCommunities of Practice: Creating Learning Envronments for Educators13267--286Graduate Professional Education from a Community of Practice Perspective: The Role of Social and Technical Networking22008Higher_Education Wiki Web_2.0 Professional_Education Blended_Programme Podcasting Threaded_Discussion Tapped-In Chat Social_Computing Graduate_Education Blog This chapter describes the value and means of re-visioning graduate professional education as an activity that occurs at the intersection of three topics: practice, pedagogy and digital culture. The chapter considers social computing applications as a mechanism to support a shift in the context of graduate professional education from schooling for transfer to situated engagement. The Community of Practice model of learning supports this shift in roles and activities for students and faculty by increasing peer-to-peer engagement and opportunities to engage with experts and expert practice beyond what is locally available. Recognizing that practitioner-students often are not involved in vital, active, engaged, professional communities outside their workplace, and that many faculty members in teaching universities are, likewise, not centrally involved in a larger research community, the chapter offers a view of social and technical networking tools that create participation structures to bridge these communities. The chapter illustrates these ideas by reference to two graduate blended programmes (combining online and face-to-face settings).CLEEhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2bf8923ae9e04a9522fa8d81758511ea1/xckukxckuk2008-04-12T22:06:45+02:00Adult_Literacy_Education Adult_Education Wiki Web_2.0 Legitimate_Peripheral_Participation Scalability Mentoring LPP <span style="color:#555555;">Erik <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Jacobson">Jacobson</a> </span><em>Communities of Practice: Creating Learning Environments for Educators, </em><em>2, </em><em>chapter 16, </em><em>Information Age Publishing, </em><em>Charlotte, NC, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Sat Apr 12 22:06:45 CEST 2008Charlotte, NCCommunities of Practice: Creating Learning Environments for Educators16327--346The Adult Literacy Education Wiki as a Virtual Community of Practice22008Adult_Literacy_Education Adult_Education Wiki Web_2.0 Legitimate_Peripheral_Participation Scalability Mentoring LPP This chapter asks whether a large wiki can be considered a Community of Practice (CoP) and whether or not this is a useful question to ask. The focus of the chapter is the Adult Literacy Education Wiki, an on-going creation of adult basic education teachers, administrators and researchers. The ALE Wiki has a core group of very active contributors, over 700 registered users, and more than 720 pages of content. The chapter includes a description of choices the organizers made when constructing the wiki and how those choices create the potential for the ALE Wiki to create a small CoP at its centre. The chapter uses the concept of CoPs as a heuristic to examine the multi-layered participation structure of the wiki. The conclusion is that while the ALE Wiki as a whole cannot be considered a CoP, the concept is a useful way to identify some of the strengths of the wiki and to note the limitations of working with such a large group.CLEEhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23bcca4965724e397cd0249a09e4e26a9/xckukxckuk2008-04-12T22:06:45+02:00Web_2.0 Participation Data_Integration Evidence_of_Impact Embedding_Performance_Indicators Collaborative_Data_Mining Reflective_Practice Empowering_Self-Evaluation Headteachers Facilitation <span style="color:#555555;">Leonie <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Ramondt">Ramondt</a> </span><em>Communities of Practice: Creating Learning Environments for Educators, </em><em>2, </em><em>chapter 18, </em><em>Information Age Publishing, </em><em>Charlotte, NC, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Sat Apr 12 22:06:45 CEST 2008Charlotte, NCCommunities of Practice: Creating Learning Environments for Educators18367--394Online CoPs – towards the next generation22008Web_2.0 Participation Data_Integration Evidence_of_Impact Embedding_Performance_Indicators Collaborative_Data_Mining Reflective_Practice Empowering_Self-Evaluation Headteachers Facilitation This chapter is set in the context of the online Communities of Practice (CoPs) developed by the Ultralab facilitation team for the National College of School Leaderships (NCSL) in England. Firstly, the background and philosophy are briefly explored along with elements of facilitation that enable CoPs to thrive. Next, the impact participation had on practice, from the individual to the systemic, is described along with Fullan's (2005) assertion that sustainable capacity building requires a tri-level solution. It is then suggested that members of CoPs are becoming increasingly e-mature and that embedding key performance indicators into online practice for feedback and self-evaluation can empower members to effectively co-facilitate their communities as well as generate a range of outputs including system indicators, policy measures and rapid feedback. Finally, some features of current web-based technologies are described along with ways these might be integrated into a holistic framework. The aim is to stimulate a discussion of strategies and tools that might help the next generation of CoPs to realise more fully their potential.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2686bbeb97802d50896b07c64d8a8c61d/stockerastockera2008-02-19T15:35:41+01:00Stakeholder Web_2.0 Corporate_Web2.0 i* <span style="color:#555555;">Alexander <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Stocker">Stocker</a> und Anwar Us <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Saeed">Saeed</a> und Patrick <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Höfler">H&#246;fler</a> und Markus <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Strohmaier">Strohmaier</a> und Klaus <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Tochtermann">Tochtermann</a> </span><em>Tagungsband der Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI '08), </em>(<em>2008</em>)Tue Feb 19 15:35:41 CET 2008Tagungsband der Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI '08)Stakeholder-Orientierung als Gestaltungsprinzip für Corporate Web 2.0: Eine explorative Analyse2008Stakeholder Web_2.0 Corporate_Web2.0 i* http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21917f9aa19afa25e045389e96335a18a/dbenz_testdbenz_test2008-02-19T09:25:40+01:00web_2.0 diploma_thesis tools social_bookmarking folksonomy_background <span style="color:#555555;">Tony <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Hammond">Hammond</a> und Timo <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Hannay">Hannay</a> und Ben <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Lund">Lund</a> und Joanna <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Scott">Scott</a> </span><em>D-Lib Magazine</em><em>April2005. </em>Tue Feb 19 09:25:40 CET 2008D-Lib MagazineApril4Social Bookmarking Tools (I) - A General Review112005web_2.0 diploma_thesis tools social_bookmarking folksonomy_background This paper reviews some current initiatives, as of early 2005, in providing public link management applications on the Web � utilities that are often referred to under the general moniker of 'social bookmarking tools'. There are a couple of things going on here: 1) server-side software aimed specifically at managing links with, crucially, a strong, social networking flavour, and 2) an unabashedly open and unstructured approach to tagging, or user classification, of those links. A number of such utilities are presented here, together with an emergent new class of tools that caters more to the academic communities and that stores not only user-supplied tags, but also structured citation metadata terms wherever it is possible to glean this information from service providers. This provision of rich, structured metadata means that the user is provided with an accurate third-party identification of a document, which could be used to retrieve that document, but is also free to search on user-supplied terms so that documents of interest (or rather, references to documents) can be made discoverable and aggregated with other similar descriptions either recorded by the user or by other users.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23f89b8a6ddbc97aaac4032df1e09f320/the_normthe_norm2008-02-18T13:13:33+01:00overview web_2.0 library_2.0 theory <span style="color:#555555;">Karen G. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Schneider">Schneider</a> </span><em>Web, </em><em>October2006. </em><em>predavanje . </em>Mon Feb 18 13:13:33 CET 2008WebOctoberpredavanjeLibrary 2.0 Cookbook: A commonsense guide to those perplexing but intriguing new technologies you keep hearing about2006overview web_2.0 library_2.0 theory http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29bff25cc205989d8a32bd9df193f25fc/the_normthe_norm2008-02-18T13:13:32+01:00web_2.0 theory <span style="color:#555555;">Tim <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/O&#039;Reilly">O'Reilly</a> </span><em>Web Article - O'Reilly Media, Inc</em>(<em>2005</em>)Mon Feb 18 13:13:32 CET 2008Web Article - O'Reilly Media, IncWhat Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software2005web_2.0 theory http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a9844d08c6bcd2bef7fc8045823a9633/the_normthe_norm2008-02-18T13:13:25+01:00web_2.0 library_2.0 <span style="color:#555555;">Karen <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Coyle">Coyle</a> </span><em>The Journal of Academic Librarianship</em><em>33(2):289--291</em><em>#mar#2007. </em>Mon Feb 18 13:13:25 CET 2008The Journal of Academic Librarianship#mar#2289--291The Library Catalog in a 2.0 World332007web_2.0 library_2.0