BibSonomyburst/tag/bibsonomyBibSonomy RSS feed for /tag/bibsonomy2012-02-15T11:25:15+01:00http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2bc08f76536610f3f376bece5f0b46ad5/droesslerdroessler2012-01-23T10:12:54+01:00bibsonomy puma tagging <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Ames">Morgan Ames</a>, and <a href="/author/Naaman">Mor Naaman</a> </span><em>Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, </em><em>page 971--980. </em><em>New York, NY, USA, </em><em>ACM, </em>(<em>2007</em>)Mon Jan 23 10:12:54 CET 2012New York, NY, USAProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems971--980CHI '07Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media2007bibsonomy puma tagging Why do people tag? Users have mostly avoided annotating media such as photos -- both in desktop and mobile environments -- despite the many potential uses for annotations, including recall and retrieval. We investigate the incentives for annotation in Flickr, a popular web-based photo-sharing system, and ZoneTag, a cameraphone photo capture and annotation tool that uploads images to Flickr. In Flickr, annotation (as textual tags) serves both personal and social purposes, increasing incentives for tagging and resulting in a relatively high number of annotations. ZoneTag, in turn, makes it easier to tag cameraphone photos that are uploaded to Flickr by allowing annotation and suggesting relevant tags immediately after capture.</p> <p>A qualitative study of ZoneTag/Flickr users exposed various tagging patterns and emerging motivations for photo annotation. We offer a taxonomy of motivations for annotation in this system along two dimensions (sociality and function), and explore the various factors that people consider when tagging their photos. Our findings suggest implications for the design of digital photo organization and sharing applications, as well as other applications that incorporate user-based annotation.Why we taghttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c9437d5ec56ba949f533aeec00f571e3/nosebrainnosebrain2012-01-19T12:34:45+01:00bibsonomy bookmark publication sharing social system <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Benz">Dominik Benz</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Mitzlaff">Folke Mitzlaff</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>The VLDB Journal</em> <em>19(6):849--875</em> (<em>December 2010</em>)Thu Jan 19 12:34:45 CET 2012Berlin / HeidelbergThe VLDB Journaldec6849--875The Social Bookmark and Publication Management System BibSonomy192010bibsonomy bookmark publication sharing social system Social resource sharing systems are central elements of the Web 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25eb699b2e53803ca9e5fadf22d8b5966/victorinostarvictorinostar2011-12-16T09:47:58+01:00bibsonomy level_variation lucene p-core polysemy relatedness serendipitous_browsing similarity synonymy <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Benz">Dominik Benz</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Mitzlaff">Folke Mitzlaff</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>The VLDB Journal</em> (<em>2010</em>)Fri Dec 16 09:47:58 CET 2011Berlin / HeidelbergThe VLDB Journal849-875The social bookmark and publication management system bibsonomy192010bibsonomy level_variation lucene p-core polysemy relatedness serendipitous_browsing similarity synonymy Social resource sharing systems are central elements of the Web 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.SpringerLink - The VLDB Journal, Volume 19, Number 6http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23775b453c9c9e162301249a6a3233e2f/lisch124lisch1242011-11-22T12:03:37+01:00adoptions benefits bibSonomy definitions folksonomy iehhu impact maturity parataxonomy strategies taxonomy technology vendors <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Roebuck">Kevin Roebuck</a> </span>(<em>2011</em>)Tue Nov 22 12:03:37 CET 2011Folksonomy: High-impact Strategies - What You Need to Know: Definitions, Adoptions, Impact, Benefits, Maturity, Vendors Für Kunden: Stellen Sie Ihre eigenen Bilder ein. Folksonomy: High-impact Strategies - What You Need to Know: Definitions, Adoptions, Impact, Benefits, Maturity, Vendors2011adoptions benefits bibSonomy definitions folksonomy iehhu impact maturity parataxonomy strategies taxonomy technology vendors http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21ac91a922a872523de0ce8d4984e53a3/hothohotho2011-11-16T16:51:09+01:00bibsonomy bookmarking dissertation fca recommender social tag tagging taggingsurvey <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a> </span><em>Amsterdam, </em>(<em>2011</em>)Wed Nov 16 16:51:09 CET 2011[Amsterdam]--Formal concept analysis and tag recommendations in collaborative tagging systems2011bibsonomy bookmarking dissertation fca recommender social tag tagging taggingsurvey http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2043b3ca8a198f7b16ed158b0b1023195/ugur.oezbesniliugur.oezbesnili2011-11-14T23:37:49+01:00Bibsonomy Google Hausaufgabe founders irhhu <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/White">Casey White</a> </span>(<em>2007</em>)Mon Nov 14 23:37:49 CET 2011Sergey Brin and Larry Page: the founders of Google2007Bibsonomy Google Hausaufgabe founders irhhu http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21e089903576ed068bb886d0fd9e090b5/ugur.oezbesniliugur.oezbesnili2011-11-14T23:23:56+01:00Bibsonomy Hausaufgabe Information Retrieval irhhu <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Stock">Wolfgang G. Stock</a> </span>(<em>2007</em>)Mon Nov 14 23:23:56 CET 2011Information Retrieval: Informationen suchen und finden2007Bibsonomy Hausaufgabe Information Retrieval irhhu http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23c301945817681d637ee43901c016939/nosebrainnosebrain2011-11-14T12:15:33+01:00bibsonomy folkrank information pagerank retrieval <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, </em><em>volume 4011 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, </em><em>page 411-426. </em><em>Heidelberg, </em><em>Springer, </em>(<em>June 2006</em>)Mon Nov 14 12:15:33 CET 2011HeidelbergThe Semantic Web: Research and ApplicationsJune411-426Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceInformation Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking40112006bibsonomy folkrank information pagerank retrieval Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such systems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. The reason for their immediate success is the fact that no specific skills are needed for participating. At the moment, however, the information retrieval support is limited. We present a formal model and a new search algorithm for folksonomies,called FolkRank, that exploits the structure of the folksonomy. The proposed algorithm is also applied to findcommunities within the folksonomy and is used to structure search results. All findings are demonstrated on a large scale dataset.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a333df6fdc7ff9322e3ce03988a7965e/bossatbossat2011-11-07T19:13:39+01:00bibsonomy entstehen semantik social tagging <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>Social Software in der Wertschöpfung, </em><em>Baden-Baden, </em><em>Nomos, </em>(<em>2006</em>)Mon Nov 07 19:13:39 CET 2011Baden-BadenSocial Software in der WertschöpfungDas Entstehen von Semantik in BibSonomy2006bibsonomy entstehen semantik social tagging Immer mehr Soziale-Lesezeichen-Systeme entstehen im heutigen Web. In solchen Systemen erstellen die Nutzer leichtgewichtige begriffliche Strukturen, so genannte Folksonomies. Ihren Erfolg verdanken sie der Tatsache, dass man keine speziellen Fähigkeiten benötigt, um an der Gestaltung mitzuwirken. In diesem Artikel beschreiben wir unser System BibSonomy. Es erlaubt das Speichern, Verwalten und Austauschen sowohl von Lesezeichen (Bookmarks) als auch von Literaturreferenzen in Form von BibTeX-Einträgen. Die Entwicklung des verwendeten Vokabulars und der damit einhergehenden Entstehung einer gemeinsamen Semantik wird detailliert diskutiert.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/236a9741b6b8733c73b3d7193ddb550e2/iyas_hilaliyas_hilal2011-10-17T11:37:18+02:00bibsonomy publication social <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/J�schke">Robert J�schke</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>Proceedings of the Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, </em><em>Aalborg, Denmark, </em><em>Aalborg University Press, </em>(<em>July 2006</em>)Mon Oct 17 11:37:18 CEST 2011Aalborg, DenmarkProceedings of the Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structuresjul{BibSonomy: A Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System}2006bibsonomy publication social http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25eb699b2e53803ca9e5fadf22d8b5966/iyas_hilaliyas_hilal2011-10-17T11:26:29+02:00BibSonomy Web2.0 bookmark publication social <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Benz">Dominik Benz</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Mitzlaff">Folke Mitzlaff</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>The VLDB Journal</em> (<em>2010</em>)Mon Oct 17 11:26:29 CEST 2011Berlin / HeidelbergThe VLDB Journal849-875The social bookmark and publication management system bibsonomy192010BibSonomy Web2.0 bookmark publication social Social resource sharing systems are central elements of the Web 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.SpringerLink - The VLDB Journal, Volume 19, Number 6http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2eb4553d07c2975a62fff33e92646a7df/hothohotho2011-09-07T10:03:04+02:00analysis authority bibsonomy network peer toread <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Anagnostopoulos">Aris Anagnostopoulos</a>, <a href="/author/Brova">George Brova</a>, and <a href="/author/Terzi">Evimaria Terzi</a> </span><em>Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD 2011, </em>(<em>2011</em>)Wed Sep 07 10:03:04 CEST 2011Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD 2011Peer and Authority Pressure in Information-Propagation Models2011analysis authority bibsonomy network peer toread http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25eb699b2e53803ca9e5fadf22d8b5966/beatebeate2011-07-17T22:27:39+02:002010 bibsonomy myown research <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Benz">Dominik Benz</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Mitzlaff">Folke Mitzlaff</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>The VLDB Journal</em> (<em>2010</em>)Sun Jul 17 22:27:39 CEST 2011Berlin / HeidelbergThe VLDB Journal849-875The social bookmark and publication management system bibsonomy1920102010 bibsonomy myown research Social resource sharing systems are central elements of the Web 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.SpringerLink - The VLDB Journal, Volume 19, Number 6http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25eb699b2e53803ca9e5fadf22d8b5966/arthurrarthurr2011-07-08T11:53:36+02:00bibsonomy <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Benz">Dominik Benz</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Mitzlaff">Folke Mitzlaff</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>The VLDB Journal</em> (<em>2010</em>)Fri Jul 08 11:53:36 CEST 2011Berlin / HeidelbergThe VLDB Journal849-875The social bookmark and publication management system bibsonomy192010bibsonomy Social resource sharing systems are central elements of the Web 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.SpringerLink - The VLDB Journal, Volume 19, Number 6http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25eb699b2e53803ca9e5fadf22d8b5966/dbenzdbenz2011-07-08T11:15:59+02:002010 bibsonomy myown vldb <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Benz">Dominik Benz</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Mitzlaff">Folke Mitzlaff</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>The VLDB Journal</em> (<em>2010</em>)Fri Jul 08 11:15:59 CEST 2011Berlin / HeidelbergThe VLDB Journal849-875The social bookmark and publication management system bibsonomy1920102010 bibsonomy myown vldb Social resource sharing systems are central elements of the Web 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.SpringerLink - The VLDB Journal, Volume 19, Number 6http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22e00895361ce1789e6df7a67b14021bc/hanslhansl2011-06-26T11:20:09+02:00bibsonomy referencemanagement socialbookmarking <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Regulski">Katharina Regulski</a> </span>(<em>2008</em>)Sun Jun 26 11:20:09 CEST 2011Aufwand und Nutzen beim Einsatz von Social-Bookmarking-Services als Nachweisinstrument f\"{u}r wissenschaftliche Forschungsartikel2008bibsonomy referencemanagement socialbookmarking Autoren wissenschaftlicher Artikel stehen unterschiedliche Wege bei der Recherche nach Hintergrundmaterial zu ihren Projekten zur Verf\"{u}gung. Dass Social-Bookmarking-Dienste, die als Teil des Web 2.0 (O'Reilly, 2005) und der Bibliothek 2.0 (Danowski, 2006) genannt werden, eine sinnvolle Erg\"{a}nzung zu den herk\"{o}mmlichen Nachweisdatenbanken sein k\"{o}nnen, soll der vorliegende Artikel zeigen.BibSonomy :: publication :: Aufwand und Nutzen beim Einsatz von Social-Bookmarking-Services als Nachweisinstrument f�r wissenschaftliche Forschungsartikelhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/240a36107fb337776c60ab6c85991497e/bluedolphinbluedolphin2011-06-10T09:04:03+02:00analysis bibsonomy emergent_semantics folksonomy my_thesis ontology <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/J�schke">Robert J�schke</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>Data Science and Classification: Proc. of the 10th IFCS Conf., </em><em>page 261--270. </em><em>Berlin, Heidelberg, </em><em>Springer, </em>(<em>2006</em>)Fri Jun 10 09:04:03 CEST 2011Berlin, HeidelbergData Science and Classification: Proc. of the 10th IFCS Conf.261--270Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge OrganizationMining Association Rules in Folksonomies2006analysis bibsonomy emergent_semantics folksonomy my_thesis ontology http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/221b9fe225dd544fdd2530a34dc6384be/lfkilcherlfkilcher2011-04-05T13:00:52+02:002010 bibsonomy bookmark management php social <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Benz">Dominik Benz</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Mitzlaff">Folke Mitzlaff</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>The VLDB Journal</em> (<em>2010</em>)<em>to appear . </em>Tue Apr 05 13:00:52 CEST 2011The VLDB Journal(to appear)The Social Bookmark and Publication Management System BibSonomy20102010 bibsonomy bookmark management php social Social resource sharing systems are central elements of theWeb 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2da6c676c5664017247c7564fc247b190/bertaberta2011-03-03T16:27:53+01:00BibSonomy BibTeX folksonomy network <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Cattuto">Ciro Cattuto</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, <a href="/author/Baldassarri">Andrea Baldassarri</a>, <a href="/author/Servedio">Vito D. P. Servedio</a>, <a href="/author/Loreto">Vittorio Loreto</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Grahl">Miranda Grahl</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>AI Communications Journal, Special Issue on ``Network Analysis in Natural Sciences and Engineering&#039;&#039;</em> <em>20(4):245-262</em> (<em>2007</em>)Thu Mar 03 16:27:53 CET 2011AI Communications Journal, Special Issue on ``Network Analysis in Natural Sciences and Engineering''4245-262Network Properties of Folksonomies202007BibSonomy BibTeX folksonomy network See http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e1a5234a896b1f422473b1fe5d91e26b/stumme for a shorter workshop version.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/299cafad8ce2afb5879c6c85c14cc5259/bertaberta2011-03-03T16:23:32+01:002009 bibsonomy bookmarks ht09 managing publications social-bookmarking <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Benz">Dominik Benz</a>, <a href="/author/Eisterlehner">Folke Eisterlehner</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>HT &#039;09: Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, </em><em>page 323--324. </em><em>New York, NY, USA, </em><em>ACM, </em>(<em>June 2009</em>)Thu Mar 03 16:23:32 CET 2011New York, NY, USAHT '09: Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermediajun323--324Managing publications and bookmarks with BibSonomy20092009 bibsonomy bookmarks ht09 managing publications social-bookmarking In this demo we present BibSonomy, a social bookmark and publication sharing system.