BibSonomyburst/tag/schemaBibSonomy RSS feed for /tag/schema2012-02-15T06:12:59+01:00http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d602efa9ac7e7adda18f1bb8220ae451/maxirichtermaxirichter2012-02-08T14:16:12+01:00schema w3c xml xsd <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/W3C"> W3C</a> </span>(<em>2004</em>)Wed Feb 08 14:16:12 CET 2012XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition ; W3C Recommendation 28 October 20042004schema w3c xml xsd http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2610c2222ce4625ab048ca84783901550/maxirichtermaxirichter2012-02-02T12:04:35+01:00gui nocache richterm_ma schema ui ui_modelling xml xsd <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/KXForms"> KXForms</a> </span>(<em>2012</em>)Thu Feb 02 12:04:35 CET 2012KXForms2012gui nocache richterm_ma schema ui ui_modelling xml xsd http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2dd4e6cc43889af98e93f445442d9c051/maxirichtermaxirichter2012-02-02T11:26:50+01:00graph gui nocache richterm_ma schema visualization xml xsd <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Cosnier">Régis Cosnier</a> </span>(<em>2011</em>)Thu Feb 02 11:26:50 CET 2012XSD Diagram2011graph gui nocache richterm_ma schema visualization xml xsd http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27d81c5284dd9e0354a65da9013c70079/maxirichtermaxirichter2012-01-18T14:25:18+01:00nocache schema xml xsd xslt <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/wwbota.free.fr"> wwbota.free.fr</a> </span>(<em>2012</em>)Wed Jan 18 14:25:18 CET 2012XSLT transforms library2012nocache schema xml xsd xslt http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22e73d69b71dc18995c015fb42b413a57/maxirichtermaxirichter2012-01-18T14:25:16+01:00frbr metadata schema xml xobis <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/elane.stanford.edu"> elane.stanford.edu</a> </span>(<em>2012</em>)Wed Jan 18 14:25:16 CET 2012XOBIS - an Experimental Schema for Unifying Bibliographic and Authority Records2012frbr metadata schema xml xobis http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/292e1a21d7181d1226a3053bd77bb765b/maxirichtermaxirichter2012-01-18T14:25:14+01:00metadata schema xobis <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/elane.stanford.edu"> elane.stanford.edu</a> </span>(<em>2012</em>)Wed Jan 18 14:25:14 CET 2012Introducing XOBIS to the FRBR Working Group (2003).2012metadata schema xobis http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/234f585c18c008786b3a9873380bb08b9/maxirichtermaxirichter2012-01-18T14:22:46+01:00xsd xml schema best_practice <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/www.xfront.com"> www.xfront.com</a> </span>(<em>2012</em>)Wed Jan 18 14:22:46 CET 2012XML Schemas: Best Practices2012xsd xml schema best_practice http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27ad492ab123d1e9a6f29ef900708aa13/clemensbaierclemensbaier2012-01-11T08:39:17+01:00schema xml <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Vlist">Eric van der. Vlist</a> </span><em>O&#039;Reilly, </em><em>Köln u.a., </em>(<em>2003</em>)Wed Jan 11 08:39:17 CET 2012Köln [u.a.]XML Schema2003schema xml XML Schema.: Eric van der Vlist: 9783897213456: Bücherhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/254d0cb6e7a1db908f430f35329673474/chriguchrigu2011-12-17T18:37:35+01:00comparison integration matching schema <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Do">Hong-Hai Do</a>, <a href="/author/Melnik">Sergey Melnik</a>, and <a href="/author/Rahm">Erhard Rahm</a> </span><em>Web, Web-Services, and Database Systems, </em><em>volume 2593 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, </em><em>Springer, </em><em>Berlin / Heidelberg, </em>(<em>2003</em>)Sat Dec 17 18:37:35 CET 2011Berlin / HeidelbergWeb, Web-Services, and Database Systems221-237Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceComparison of Schema Matching Evaluations25932003comparison integration matching schema Recently, schema matching has found considerable interest in both research and practice. Determining matching components of database or XML schemas is needed in many applications, e.g. for E-business and data integration. Various schema matching systems have been developed to solve the problem semi-automatically. While there have been some evaluations, the overall effectiveness of currently available automatic schema matching systems is largely unclear. This is because the evaluations were conducted in diverse ways making it difficult to assess the effectiveness of each single system, let alone to compare their effectiveness. In this paper we survey recently published schema matching evaluations. For this purpose, we introduce the major criteria that influence the effectiveness of a schema matching approach and use these criteria to compare the various systems. Based on our observations, we discuss the requirements for future match implementations and evaluations.Abstract - SpringerLinkhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a14dcda4867ec9c1542f92d24abec4d6/chriguchrigu2011-12-17T18:31:14+01:00integration schema <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Rahm">Erhard Rahm</a>, and <a href="/author/Bernstein">Philip A. Bernstein</a> </span><em>The VLDB Journal</em> (<em>2001</em>)Sat Dec 17 18:31:14 CET 2011Berlin / HeidelbergThe VLDB Journal334-350A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching102001integration schema Schema matching is a basic problem in many database application domains, such as data integration, E-business, data warehousing, and semantic query processing. In current implementations, schema matching is typically performed manually, which has significant limitations. On the other hand, previous research papers have proposed many techniques to achieve a partial automation of the match operation for specific application domains. We present a taxonomy that covers many of these existing approaches, and we describe the approaches in some detail. In particular, we distinguish between schema-level and instance-level, element-level and structure-level, and language-based and constraint-based matchers. Based on our classification we review some previous match implementations thereby indicating which part of the solution space they cover. We intend our taxonomy and review of past work to be useful when comparing different approaches to schema matching, when developing a new match algorithm, and when implementing a schema matching component.The VLDB Journal, Volume 10, Number 4 - SpringerLinkhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2cb54f9a4a0f243b6b50e2571a4af0b13/omar.aboukhaledomar.aboukhaled2011-12-05T18:11:10+01:00Decision Making, Ontology, Schema argumentation, knowledge sharing, {OWL,} {XML} <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Evangelou">Christina E. Evangelou</a>, <a href="/author/Khaled">Omar Abou Khaled</a>, <a href="/author/Karacapilidis">Nikos I. Karacapilidis</a>, and <a href="/author/Drissi">Houda Chabbi Drissi</a> </span><em>ECKM, </em><em>page 317--324. </em><em>Paris, France, </em>(<em>2004</em>)Mon Dec 05 18:11:10 CET 2011Paris, France{ECKM}317--324An Ontology Model for Knowledge Management in Collaborative Decision Making Settings2004Decision Making, Ontology, Schema argumentation, knowledge sharing, {OWL,} {XML} Expert knowledge and decision-making capabilities are widely considered as organisational ressources of high value. In order to exploit the organisational knowledge capital in collaborative decision-making settings, we propose a generic ontology model that has been defined with the use of {XML} technologies, as it attempts to chieve maximun interoperability and reuse. In this paper we present the structure and the main features of th proposed ontology model, and we describe its application through a case concerning manufacturing management.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/235448e716d84893ff481029b8c968c3c/bkahloulabkahloula2011-11-05T11:12:09+01:00databases matching relational schema xml <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Kahloula">Boubaker Kahloula</a>, and <a href="/author/Bouamrane">Karim Bouamrane</a> </span><em>Journal of Information Technology Review</em> <em>2(2):53-59</em> (<em>2011</em>)Sat Nov 05 11:12:09 CET 2011Journal of Information Technology Review253-59Loading XML Data into Relational Databases Architecture of a System Including a (Semi-) Automatic Matching22011databases matching relational schema xml http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25c9ea1f7255def1c6d46a8dd8d14b8c8/buehnerbuehner2011-10-12T10:53:39+02:00data matching ontology schema semantic <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Shvaiko">P. Shvaiko</a>, and <a href="/author/Euzenat">J. Euzenat</a> </span><em>Journal on Data Semantics IV</em> (<em>2005</em>)Wed Oct 12 10:53:39 CEST 2011Journal on Data Semantics IV146--171A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches37302005data matching ontology schema semantic Schema and ontology matching is a critical problem in many application domains, such as semantic web, schema/ontology integration, data warehouses, e-commerce, etc. Many different matching solutions have been proposed so far. In this paper we present a new classification of schema-based matching techniques that builds on the top of state of the art in both schema and ontology matching. Some innovations are in introducing new criteria which are based on (i) general properties of matching techniques, (ii) interpretation of input information, and (iii) the kind of input information. In particular, we distinguish between approximate and exact techniques at schema-level; and syntactic, semantic, and external techniques at element- and structure-level. Based on the classification proposed we overview some of the recent schema/ontology matching systems pointing which part of the solution space they cover. The proposed classification provides a common conceptual basis, and, hence, can be used for comparing different existing schema/ontology matching techniques and systems as well as for designing new ones, taking advantages of state of the art solutions.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/257b29f41a59a8fdf253ce84728d7b9a3/maxirichtermaxirichter2011-10-05T09:18:36+02:00complexity schema xml xsd <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Tamayo">Alain Tamayo</a>, <a href="/author/Granell">Carlos Granell</a>, and <a href="/author/Huerta">Joaqu&amp;#xed;n Huerta</a> </span>(<em>2011</em>)<em>cite arxiv:1110.0207 Comment: 9 pages, 10 tables, 4 figures; COM.Geo &#039;11 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Rese<span class="info">...<div>cite arxiv:1110.0207 Comment: 9 pages, 10 tables, 4 figures; COM.Geo &#039;11 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research &amp;amp; Applications, ACM, no. 17, 2011</div></span> . </em>Wed Oct 05 09:18:36 CEST 2011cite arxiv:1110.0207 Comment: 9 pages, 10 tables, 4 figures; COM.Geo '11 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research &amp; Applications, ACM, no. 17, 2011Analysing complexity of XML Schemas in geospatial web services2011complexity schema xml xsd XML Schema is the language used to define the structure of messages exchanged between OGC-based web service clients and providers. The size of these schemas has been growing with time, reaching a state that makes its understanding and effective application a hard task. A first step to cope with this situation is to provide different ways to measure the complexity of the schemas. In this regard, we present in this paper an analysis of the complexity of XML schemas in OGC web services. We use a group of metrics found in the literature and introduce new metrics to measure size and/or complexity of these schemas. The use of adequate metrics allows us to quantify the complexity, quality and other properties of the schemas, which can be very useful in different scenarios. Analysing complexity of XML Schemas in geospatial web serviceshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b67c58c17f44f88d957c7bfdad515c9b/vojvoj2011-08-01T15:45:52+02:00XML critics schema validation <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Clark">James Clark</a> </span><em>ietf-xml-use mailing list</em> (<em>2002</em>)Mon Aug 01 15:45:52 CEST 2011ietf-xml-use mailing listRELAX NG and W3C XML Schema2002XML critics schema validation http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/219ecf8f23073d1c1ce1b98add6f1c8a6/vojvoj2011-08-01T11:39:48+02:00relaxng schema xml <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/ISO"> ISO</a> (Eds.). </span>(<em>2008</em>)Mon Aug 01 11:39:48 CEST 2011ISO/IEC 19757-2Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) -- Part 3: Regular-grammar-based validation -- RELAX NG2008relaxng schema xml http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a7d9abab8129e22d42c55dcf54a17dfa/vojvoj2011-08-01T10:37:55+02:00schema schematron xml <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/van der Vlist">Eric van der Vlist</a> </span><em>O&#039;Reilly, </em>(<em>March 2007</em>)Mon Aug 01 10:37:55 CEST 20113Schematron2007schema schematron xml http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2eb2b07eccd5f0c5ef4c75ca030e26663/vojvoj2011-08-01T09:45:45+02:00schema standard xml <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/ISO"> ISO</a> (Eds.). </span>(<em>2006</em>)Mon Aug 01 09:45:45 CEST 2011ISO/IEC 19757-3Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) -- Part 3: Rule-based validation -- Schematron2006schema standard xml http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d341535ac02417eef3ac2315dfecdde4/toboldtobold2011-05-22T09:13:38+02:00graph_based schema shared_cognition <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Rentsch">Joan R. Rentsch</a>, and <a href="/author/Klimoski">Richard J. Klimoski</a> </span><em>Journal of Organizational Behavior</em> <em>22(2):107--120</em> (<em>2001</em>)Sun May 22 09:13:38 CEST 2011Journal of Organizational Behavior2107--120Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: antecedents of team member schema agreement222001graph_based schema shared_cognition Abstract The primary contribution of the present study, as implied by the title of this paper, was to delineate and to test antecedents of team member schema agreement and their indirect effects on team effectiveness. The study was conducted in a naturalistic setting involving 315 individuals who comprised 41 teams. Team member teamwork schema agreement was assessed using multidimensional scaling to analyse paired comparison ratings. Demography, team experience, team member recruitment, and team size were significantly related to team member schema agreement, which in turn was significantly related to team effectiveness. Several antecedents were related to team effectiveness indirectly through team member teamwork schema agreement. The results have implications for research on cognition in teams. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Why do great minds think alike?: antecedents of team member schema agreement - Rentsch - 2001 - Journal of Organizational Behavior - Wiley Online Libraryhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27db6fb059a573e877a17bf491c73fb3e/vojvoj2011-02-11T11:09:30+01:00datatypes schema xml <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Biron">Paul V. Biron</a>, and <a href="/author/Malhotra">Ashok Malhotra</a> </span>(<em>Oct 28, 2004</em>)Fri Feb 11 11:09:30 CET 2011W3C Recommendation10XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition2004datatypes schema xml 28XML Schema: Datatypes is part 2 of the specification of the XML Schema language. It defines facilities for defining datatypes to be used in XML Schemas as well as other XML specifications. The datatype language, which is itself represented in XML 1.0, provides a superset of the capabilities found in XML 1.0 document type definitions (DTDs) for specifying datatypes on elements and attributes.