BibSonomyburst/tag/socialbookmarkingBibSonomy RSS feed for /tag/socialbookmarking2012-02-16T13:52:26+01:00http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2689b283ba030bb78ed94146aae4bc760/stummestumme2012-01-04T11:33:48+01:00itegpub semantic_maturity semanticmaturity social_bookmarking socialbookmarking <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Atzmüller">Martin Atzmüller</a>, <a href="/author/Benz">Dominik Benz</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Social Data on the Web SDoW2011, </em>(<em>2011</em>)Wed Jan 04 11:33:48 CET 2012Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Social Data on the Web (SDoW2011)Towards Mining Semantic Maturity in Social Bookmarking Systems2011itegpub semantic_maturity semanticmaturity social_bookmarking socialbookmarking http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ff24ef7f356f297a8be0a089e3539045/trudetrude2011-09-16T11:10:47+02:00blog cscl media microblogging myown socialBookmarking socialNetwork socialSoftware web2.0 wiki <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Ebner">Martin Ebner</a>, and <a href="/author/Lorenz">Anja Lorenz</a> </span><em>CSCL-Kompendium 2.0, </em><em>chapter 2.2, </em><em>Oldenbourg, </em><em>Frankfurt, </em><em>2 edition, </em>(<em>N.N.</em>)Fri Sep 16 11:10:47 CEST 2011FrankfurtCSCL-Kompendium 2.02.22{Web 2.0 als Basistechnologien für CSCL-Umgebungen (Preprint)}N.N.blog cscl media microblogging myown socialBookmarking socialNetwork socialSoftware web2.0 wiki Nach der Dotcom-Blase und der damit verbundenen ersten abflauenden Euphorie gegenüber den Potentialen des World Wide Webs wurde im Jahr 2004 ein neuer Begriff postuliert: Web 2.0. Dieser beschreibt aber keinen technologischen Versionssprung, sondern den Umgang der Nutzer/innen durch deren aktive Beteiligung. Es entstehen immer mehr Dienste und Applikationen, die eine Einbeziehung der Nutzer/innen ermöglichen und forcieren und es so immer einfacher machen, im World Wide Web zu publizieren. In diesem Beitrag wird eine erste grobe Übersicht über die wichtigsten Applikationen gegeben, sowie deren typischen Merkmale herausgearbeitet. Ziel ist es Grundlagen für nachfolgende Kapitel zu geben, welche die speziellen Ausprägungen der Anwendungen in CSCL-Umgebungen darlegen.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22e00895361ce1789e6df7a67b14021bc/hanslhansl2011-06-26T11:20:09+02:00bibsonomy referencemanagement socialbookmarking <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Regulski">Katharina Regulski</a> </span>(<em>2008</em>)Sun Jun 26 11:20:09 CEST 2011Aufwand und Nutzen beim Einsatz von Social-Bookmarking-Services als Nachweisinstrument f\"{u}r wissenschaftliche Forschungsartikel2008bibsonomy referencemanagement socialbookmarking Autoren wissenschaftlicher Artikel stehen unterschiedliche Wege bei der Recherche nach Hintergrundmaterial zu ihren Projekten zur Verf\"{u}gung. Dass Social-Bookmarking-Dienste, die als Teil des Web 2.0 (O'Reilly, 2005) und der Bibliothek 2.0 (Danowski, 2006) genannt werden, eine sinnvolle Erg\"{a}nzung zu den herk\"{o}mmlichen Nachweisdatenbanken sein k\"{o}nnen, soll der vorliegende Artikel zeigen.BibSonomy :: publication :: Aufwand und Nutzen beim Einsatz von Social-Bookmarking-Services als Nachweisinstrument f�r wissenschaftliche Forschungsartikelhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f307dee031e524c77faf612ed282a07e/trudetrude2011-03-07T20:59:38+01:002009 enterprise2.0 socialBookmarking <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a> </span><em>Web 2.0 in der Unternehmenspraxis, </em><em>Oldenbourg, </em><em>München, </em><em>2 edition, </em>(<em>2009</em>)Mon Mar 07 20:59:38 CET 2011M{\"u}nchenWeb 2.0 in der Unternehmenspraxis224–-37Social Bookmarking20092009 enterprise2.0 socialBookmarking http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2377070c79c6b012f2fadf9d914429f4d/enitsirhcenitsirhc2011-01-11T13:34:15+01:00socialweb socialbookmarking web\_2.0 socialsoftware <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Allen">Christopher Allen</a> </span>(<em>2004</em>)Tue Jan 11 13:34:15 CET 2011"Tracing the Evolution of Social Software"2004socialweb socialbookmarking web\_2.0 socialsoftware http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/268a0b88a7ec66c591cf925df915a9b85/enitsirhcenitsirhc2011-01-11T13:33:51+01:00socialbookmarking bibsonomy semanticweb <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>Proceedings of the Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, </em><em>page 87--102. </em><em>Aalborg University Press, </em>(<em>2006</em>)<em>subtag-supertag . </em>Tue Jan 11 13:33:51 CET 2011Proceedings of the Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structuressubtag-supertag87--102BibSonomy: A social bookmark and publication sharing system2006socialbookmarking bibsonomy semanticweb Abstract. Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such systems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. The reason for their immediate success is the fact that no specific skills are needed for participating. In this paper we specify a formal model for folksonomies and briefly describe our own system BibSonomy, which allows for sharing both bookmarks and publication references in a kind of personal library. 1CiteSeerX — BibSonomy: A social bookmark and publication sharing systemhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/245f8d8f2a8251a5e988c596a5ebb3f2d/enitsirhcenitsirhc2011-01-11T13:32:57+01:00socialweb semantics tagging socialbookmarking semantic folksonomy folksonomies emerge semanticweb <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Körner">Christian Körner</a>, <a href="/author/Benz">Dominik Benz</a>, <a href="/author/Strohmaier">Markus Strohmaier</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>Proceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web Conference WWW 2010, </em><em>Raleigh, NC, USA, </em><em>ACM, </em>(<em>April 2010</em>)Tue Jan 11 13:32:57 CET 2011Raleigh, NC, USAProceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2010)aprStop Thinking, start Tagging - Tag Semantics emerge from Collaborative Verbosity2010socialweb semantics tagging socialbookmarking semantic folksonomy folksonomies emerge semanticweb Recent research provides evidence for the presence of emergent semantics in collaborative tagging systems. While several methods have been proposed, little is known about the factors that influence the evolution of semantic structures in these systems. A natural hypothesis is that the quality of the emergent semantics depends on the pragmatics of tagging: Users with certain usage patterns might contribute more to the resulting semantics than others. In this work, we propose several measures which enable a pragmatic differentiation of taggers by their degree of contribution to emerging semantic structures. We distinguish between categorizers, who typically use a small set of tags as a replacement for hierarchical classification schemes, and describers, who are annotating resources with a wealth of freely associated, descriptive keywords. To study our hypothesis, we apply semantic similarity measures to 64 different partitions of a real-world and large-scale folksonomy containing different ratios of categorizers and describers. Our results not only show that ‘verbose’ taggers are most useful for the emergence of tag semantics, but also that a subset containing only 40% of the most ‘verbose’ taggers can produce results that match and even outperform the semantic precision obtained from the whole dataset. Moreover, the results suggest that there exists a causal link between the pragmatics of tagging and resulting emergent semantics. This work is relevant for designers and analysts of tagging systems interested (i) in fostering the semantic development of their platforms, (ii) in identifying users introducing “semantic noise�?, and (iii) in learning ontologies.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/280af206086a8b86f993c993e20968ab4/tellitelli2010-09-23T11:39:30+02:00DISS folksonomy powerlaw socialbookmarking sosoantrag tagging tagging\_comparison <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Kipp">Margaret Kipp</a>, and <a href="/author/Campbell">D. Grant Campbell</a> </span><em>Proceedings Annual General Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</em> (<em>2006</em>)Thu Sep 23 11:39:30 CEST 2010Proceedings Annual General Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and TechnologyPatterns and Inconsistencies in Collaborative Tagging Systems: An Examination of Tagging Practices2006DISS folksonomy powerlaw socialbookmarking sosoantrag tagging tagging\_comparison http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21197d8e783ad3d540431ec7d63a949ef/lambertlambert2010-08-23T21:26:40+02:00Bibliographie bibliothek bibliothek2.0 bibliothek20 collection_management library2.0 library20 metadatenrevolution myown reference_management referencemanagement rms socialbookmarking tagging <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Heller">Lambert Heller</a> </span><em>Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis</em> <em>31(2):162-171</em> (<em>2007</em>)Mon Aug 23 21:26:40 CEST 2010Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis2162-171Bibliographie und Sacherschliessung in der Hand vernetzter Informationsbenutzer312007Bibliographie bibliothek bibliothek2.0 bibliothek20 collection_management library2.0 library20 metadatenrevolution myown reference_management referencemanagement rms socialbookmarking tagging Die Geschichte informeller, gemeinschaftlich gepflegter Online-Bibliographien sowie die zentralen Konzepte von Social-Bookmarking-Diensten (Bibliographie sozialer Netzwerke, Sacherschließung durch Social Tagging, Folksonomies als persönliche und Collabularies als gemeinschaftliche Vokabulare) werden dargestellt und diskutiert. Zur Charakterisierung der geschilderten Gesamtentwicklung wird der Begriff Metadatenrevolution eingeführt. Es werden Strategien vorgeschlagen, mit denen Bibliotheken und Informationseinreichtungen auf diese Entwicklung eingehen können.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/253c77c99db1fdd82c5d322c1fedd58c9/draindrain2010-08-10T09:12:07+02:00ASQ ASQ_Webrecherche socialbookmarking t:lexikonartikel t:onlinedokument t:wikipediaartikel <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Wikipedia"> Wikipedia</a> </span>(<em>2010</em>)Tue Aug 10 09:12:07 CEST 2010Social Bookmarks | Wikipedia. Die freie Enzyklopädie2010ASQ ASQ_Webrecherche socialbookmarking t:lexikonartikel t:onlinedokument t:wikipediaartikel http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d5588d61dcedb6cfcf93daefe1208c6b/sirhcnailujsirhcnailuj2010-05-16T15:09:45+02:00atom blog blogging chrdem feeds folksonomy long mashup permalink podcast podcasts richuserexperience socialbookmarking socialsoftware tagging tail web2.0 wisrep10 <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Alby">Tom Alby</a> </span><em>Hanser, </em><em>Kolbergerstraße 22 81679 München, Germany, </em><em>third edition, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Sun May 16 15:09:45 CEST 2010Kolbergerstraße 22 81679 München, GermanythirdWEB 2.0 Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien32008atom blog blogging chrdem feeds folksonomy long mashup permalink podcast podcasts richuserexperience socialbookmarking socialsoftware tagging tail web2.0 wisrep10 http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d4cb31310e9968493a066647e87df08e/trudetrude2010-01-29T16:16:36+01:002009 ECML09 _todo bookmarking recommendation socialBookmarking socialTagging <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Hassan">Malik Tahir Hassan</a>, <a href="/author/Karim">Asim Karim</a>, <a href="/author/Manandhar">Suresh Manandhar</a>, and <a href="/author/Cussens">James Cussens</a> </span><em>ECML PKDD Discovery Challenge 2009 DC09, </em><em> 497, </em><em>page 85--97. </em><em>Bled, Slovenia, </em><em>CEUR Workshop Proceedings, </em>(<em>September 2009</em>)Fri Jan 29 16:16:36 CET 2010Bled, SloveniaECML PKDD Discovery Challenge 2009 (DC09)September85--97Discriminative Clustering for Content-Based Tag Recommendation in Social Bookmarking Systems49720092009 ECML09 _todo bookmarking recommendation socialBookmarking socialTagging We describe and evaluate a discriminative clustering approach for content-based tag recommendation in social bookmarking systems. Our approach uses a novel and efficient discriminative clustering method that groups posts based on the textual contents of the posts. The method also generates a ranked list of discriminating terms for each cluster. We apply the clustering method to build two clustering models – one based on the tags assigned to posts and the other based on the content terms of posts. Given a new posting, a ranked list of tags and content terms is determined from the clustering models. The final tag recommendation is based on these ranked lists. If the poster’s tagging history is available then this is also utilized in the final tag recommendation. The approach is evaluated on data from BibSonomy, a social bookmarking system. Prediction results show that the tag-based clustering model is more accurate than the termbased clustering model. Combining the predictions from both models is better than either model’s predictions. Significant improvement in recommendation is obtained over the baseline method of recommending the most frequent tags for all posts.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2109523cc06bc341b1ad455fbc29a4f3a/acka47acka472009-11-09T17:43:42+01:00scholarly_communication science socialbookmarking twitter web2.0 wikipedia <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Nentwich">Michael Nentwich</a> </span><em>ita-Manuskript, </em><em>ita-09-02. </em><em>Institut für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung an der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, </em><em>Wien, </em>(<em>November 2009</em>)Mon Nov 09 17:43:42 CET 2009WienNovemberita-09-02Cyberscience 2.0 oder 1.2? Das Web 2.0 und die Wissenschaftita-Manuskript2009scholarly_communication science socialbookmarking twitter web2.0 wikipedia http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a961a80070260c2a600c3377fe374433/snagpusssnagpuss2009-11-04T01:56:25+01:00givealink socialbookmarking <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Stoilova">Lubomira Stoilova</a>, <a href="/author/Dept">Comp Sci Dept</a>, and <a href="/author/Maguitman">Ana G. Maguitman</a> </span><em>In Proc. KDD Workshop on Link Discovery: Issues, Approaches and Applications, </em><em>page 66--73. </em><em>ACM Press, </em>(<em>2005</em>)Wed Nov 04 01:56:25 CET 2009In Proc. KDD Workshop on Link Discovery: Issues, Approaches and Applications66--73GiveALink: Mining a Semantic Network of Bookmarks for Web Search and Recommendation2005givealink socialbookmarking GiveALink is a public site where users donate their bookmarks to the Web community. Bookmarks are analyzed to build a new generation of Web mining techniques and new ways to search, recommend, surf, personalize and visualize the Web. We present a semantic similarity measure for URLs that takes advantage both of the hierarchical structure of the bookmark files of individual users, and of collaborative filtering across users. We analyze the social bookmark network induced by the similarity measure. A search and recommendation system is built from a number of ranking algorithms based on prestige, generality, and novelty measures extracted from the similarity data.CiteSeerX — GiveALink: Mining a Semantic Network of Bookmarks for Web Search and Recommendationhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2079328e18d9bf37d9b94c8343bbfee17/freefattyacidsfreefattyacids2009-05-17T10:12:22+02:00Socialbookmarking <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Hammond">Tony Hammond</a>, <a href="/author/Hannay">Timo Hannay</a>, <a href="/author/Lund">Ben Lund</a>, and <a href="/author/Scott">Joanna Scott</a> </span><em>D-Lib Magazine</em> (<em>xx Apr 2005</em>)<em>10.1045/april2005-hammond . </em>Sun May 17 10:12:22 CEST 2009D-Lib MagazineApr10.1045/april2005-hammondSocial Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Review112005Socialbookmarking xxFrom Connoteahttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/277c031f99164ed63a20a0ecd89784a37/freefattyacidsfreefattyacids2009-05-17T10:12:22+02:00Socialbookmarking <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Lund">Ben Lund</a>, <a href="/author/Hammond">Tony Hammond</a>, <a href="/author/Flack">Martin Flack</a>, and <a href="/author/Hannay">Timo Hannay</a> </span><em>D-Lib Magazine</em> (<em>xx Apr 2005</em>)<em>10.1045/april2005-lund . </em>Sun May 17 10:12:22 CEST 2009D-Lib MagazineApr10.1045/april2005-lundSocial Bookmarking Tools (II): A Case Study - Connotea112005Socialbookmarking xxFrom Connoteahttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21a361404f4ce786b33a45fce07e2c943/acka47acka472009-05-11T16:21:27+02:00MALIS09 bibsonomy socialbookmarking <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Regulski">Katharina Regulski</a> </span><em>Bibliothek. Forschung und Praxis</em> <em>31(2):177-184</em> (<em>2007</em>)Mon May 11 16:21:27 CEST 2009Bibliothek. Forschung und Praxis2177-184Aufwand und Nutzen beim Einsatz von Social-Bookmarking-Services als Nachweisinstrument für wissenschaftliche Forschungsartikel am Beispiel von BibSonomy. 312007MALIS09 bibsonomy socialbookmarking Autoren wissenschaftlicher Artikel stehen unterschiedliche Wege bei der Recherche nach Hintergrundmaterial zu ihren Projekten zur Verfügung. Dass Social-Bookmarking-Dienste, die als Teil des Web 2.0 (O’Reilly, 2005) und der Bibliothek 2.0 (Danowski, 2006) genannt werden, eine sinnvolle Ergänzung zu den herkömmlichen Nachweisdatenbanken sein können, soll der vorliegende Artikel zeigen.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27cc895a667fbdfdf90adba9385890960/acka47acka472009-01-17T18:32:21+01:00MALIS09 quellenverwaltung socialbookmarking vergleich wissensorganisation <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Kerschis">Annett Kerschis</a> </span>(<em>2007</em>)Sat Jan 17 18:32:21 CET 2009Literaturverwaltung und Wissensorganisation im Vergleich. Das Angebot von Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen und Social Bookmarking in Bezug auf die Benutzbarkeit in Bibliotheken2007MALIS09 quellenverwaltung socialbookmarking vergleich wissensorganisation http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/254813be8fc0967a9510d2751079d7ff4/acka47acka472009-01-12T15:07:39+01:00MALIS09 bibsonomy folksonomy socialbookmarking web2.0 <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Schmitz">Christoph Schmitz</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>Proceedings of the Conceptual Structure Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, </em><em>page 87-102. </em>(<em>2006</em>)Mon Jan 12 15:07:39 CET 2009Proceedings of the Conceptual Structure Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures87-102BibSonomy: A Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System2006MALIS09 bibsonomy folksonomy socialbookmarking web2.0 Social bookmark tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such systems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. The reason for their immediate success is the fact that no specific skills are needed for participating. In this paper we specify a formal model for folksonomies and briefly describe our own system BibSonomy, which allows for sharing both bookmarks and publication references in a kind of personal library.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2613f5c41ff759fc548c9085102d1c933/acka47acka472009-01-12T15:07:39+01:00MALIS09 comparison search socialbookmarking traditional <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>Advances in Information Retrieval, 30th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2008, </em><em> 4956, </em><em>page 101-113. </em><em>Springer, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Mon Jan 12 15:07:39 CET 2009Advances in Information Retrieval, 30th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2008101-113A Comparison of Social Bookmarking with Traditional Search49562008MALIS09 comparison search socialbookmarking traditional Social bookmarking systems allow users to store links to internet resources on a web page. As social bookmarking systems are growing in popularity, search algorithms have been developed that transfer the idea of link-based rankings in the Web to a social bookmarking system’s data structure. These rankings differ from traditional search engine rankings in that they incorporate the rating of users. In this study, we compare search in social bookmarking systems with traditionalWeb search. In the first part, we compare the user activity and behaviour in both kinds of systems, as well as the overlap of the underlying sets of URLs. In the second part,we compare graph-based and vector space rankings for social bookmarking systems with commercial search engine rankings. Our experiments are performed on data of the social bookmarking system Del.icio.us and on rankings and log data from Google, MSN, and AOL. We will show that part of the difference between the systems is due to different behaviour (e. g., the concatenation of multi-word lexems to single terms in Del.icio.us), and that real-world events may trigger similar behaviour in both kinds of systems. We will also show that a graph-based ranking approach on folksonomies yields results that are closer to the rankings of the commercial search engines than vector space retrieval, and that the correlation is high in particular for the domains that are well covered by the social bookmarking system.