http://www.bibsonomy.org/burst/user/acf/privacyBibSonomy BuRST Feed for /user/acf/privacy2008-07-26T22:56:00+02:00http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/235cbe27b090be1893c7d89ae82ade026/acfacf2008-05-04T04:10:01+02:00datamining privacy <span style="color:#555555;">Daniel J. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Solove">Solove</a> </span><em>San Diego Law Review</em><em>44(289):745</em>(<em>2007</em>) <em>Associate Professor, George Washington University Law School; J.D., Yale Law School. . </em>Sun May 04 04:10:01 CEST 2008San Diego Law ReviewAssociate Professor, George Washington University Law School; J.D., Yale Law School.289745GWU Law School Public Law Research PaperI've got nothing to hide and other misunderstandings of privacy442007datamining privacy In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c5388bebf7875797084858a1fd006cac/acfacf2008-04-01T06:20:18+02:00privacy datamining <span style="color:#555555;">Daniel J. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Solove">Solove</a> </span><em>San Diego Law Review</em><em>44(289):745</em>(<em>2007</em>) <em>Associate Professor, George Washington University Law School; J.D., Yale Law School. . </em>Tue Apr 01 06:20:18 CEST 2008San Diego Law ReviewAssociate Professor, George Washington University Law School; J.D., Yale Law School.289745GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper{“I’VE GOT NOTHING TO HIDE” AND OTHER MISUNDERSTANDINGS OF PRIVACY}442007privacy datamining In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.