http://www.bibsonomy.org/burst/user/acf/transitionBibSonomy BuRST Feed for /user/acf/transition2008-07-21T00:41:24+02:00http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24cf8fc6046502d90931b20142c775059/acfacf2008-05-02T14:07:20+02:00soviet_media state_media nationalism transition China <span style="color:#555555;">C. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Huang">Huang</a> </span><em>The Journal of Communication</em><em>53(3):444--459</em>(<em>2003</em>) <em>Chengju Huang is a postdoctoral fellow in journalism and media studies at Central Queensland University, Australia. . </em>Fri May 02 14:07:20 CEST 2008The Journal of CommunicationChengju Huang is a postdoctoral fellow in journalism and media studies at Central Queensland University, Australia.3444--459{Transitional Media vs. Normative Theories: Schramm, Altschull, and China}532003soviet_media state_media nationalism transition China Wilbur Schramm's "Soviet" communist model and J. Herbert Altschull's "Marxist" approach have been widely used as general theoretical frameworks to examine press systems in the Marxist world in general and China in particular. Though a growing literature suggested significant changes in Chinese journalism in the past 2 decades, very few studies have sent a direct challenge to the 2 models' theoretical wisdom through the Chinese case. This article finds neither of the 2 models is sufficient in conceptualizing the Chinese case because of Chinese news media's transitional nature and the 2 models' inner theoretical flaws as normative press theories. Furthermore, realizing the growing conflict between normative media theories and accelerated post-Cold War global media transformation, the author suggests using a transitional media approach to revisit the traditional normative media approach and calls for a more systematic study of the transitional phenomenon of global media systems.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b7ebb372eff855eb319013d79c75d063/acfacf2008-04-29T10:52:37+02:00China central_planning R&D framework transition innovation <span style="color:#555555;">X. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Liu">Liu</a> and S. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/White">White</a> </span><em>Research Policy</em><em>30(7):1091--1114</em>(<em>2001</em>)Tue Apr 29 10:52:37 CEST 2008Research Policy71091--1114{Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context}302001China central_planning R&D framework transition innovation This paper proposes a generic framework for analyzing innovation systems, anchored around five fundamental activities — R&D, implementation, end-use, education, linkage — and focused on the performance implications of a system’s structure and dynamics. Rather than simply describing the role and performance of particular actors, institutions and policies, this approach focuses on system-level characteristics, including the distribution of these activities within the system, the organizational boundaries around them, coordination mechanisms, evolutionary processes, and the effectiveness of the system in introducing, diffusing and exploiting technological innovations. The framework is applied to a comparison of China’s national innovation system under central planning and since reforms, revealing the evolving structure and dynamics of this system and current inconsistencies and perverse incentives that policymakers must address to realize their development goals. More generally, it provides a basis for addressing the implicit assumptions of organizational types, roles and convergence among innovation systems emerging in very different contexts, whether national, regional or industrial.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24c149fced30ce7d0ce6d027e9327fd89/acfacf2008-03-31T09:50:38+02:00triads transition venture_capital Russia referral China <span style="color:#555555;">Bat <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Batjargal">Batjargal</a> </span><em>William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 752</em><em>February2005. </em>Mon Mar 31 09:50:38 CEST 2008William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 752FebruaryNetwork Triads: Transitivity, Referral and Venture Capital Decisions in China and Russia2005triads transition venture_capital Russia referral China This article examines effects of dyadic ties and interpersonal trust in referrals and investment decisions of venture capitalists in the Chinese and Russian contexts. The study uses the postulate of transitivity of social network theory as a conceptual framework. The findings reveal that referee-venture capitalist tie, referee-entrepreneur tie, and interpersonal trust between referee and venture capitalist have positive effects on referrals and investment decisions of venture capitalists. The institutional, social and cultural differences between China and Russia have minimal effects on referrals. Interpersonal trust has positive effects on investment decisions in Russia.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ea96372a43d2f3d534a1630b3e835549/acfacf2008-03-30T10:19:17+02:00case_study transition public_relations <span style="color:#555555;">Judy VanSlyke <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Turk">Turk</a> and Linda H. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Scanlan">Scanlan</a> (eds.). </span>(<em>2004</em>)Sun Mar 30 10:19:17 CEST 2008University of Florida, PO Box 118400, Gainesville, FL 32611-8400internet2ndEvolution of public relations case studies from countries in transition2004case_study transition public_relations