BibSonomyburst/user/amarois/rechercheBibSonomy RSS feed for /user/amarois/recherche2012-02-16T20:50:56+01:00http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27bc27a10485f8766280992c15507b16c/amaroisamarois2007-11-22T22:36:33+01:00evaluation, recherche <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Hirsch">J. E. Hirsch</a> </span><em>PNAS</em> <em>102(46):16569--16572</em> (<em>November 2005</em>)Thu Nov 22 22:36:33 CET 2007PNASNovember4616569--16572An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output1022005evaluation, recherche I propose the index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number [\&ge;]h, as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a4ac1a115d2c2b09a51a2ddd281442ee/amaroisamarois2007-11-22T22:36:33+01:00citation, evaluation, recherche <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Durand-Barthez">M. Durand-Barthez</a> </span><em>archivesic.</em> (<em>October 2006</em>)Thu Nov 22 22:36:33 CET 2007working paperarchivesic.OctoberL'évaluation des publications scientifiques : du facteur d'impact à l'indice de notoriété2006citation, evaluation, recherche Les différentes modalités d'évaluation, «classiques» et en émergence, des publications scientifiques: les modalités traditionnelles de l'évaluation des revues : «facteur d'impact» du JCR, associé à l'évaluation individuelle du SCI (Science Citation Index)... ; mécanismes, acteurs, importance, enjeux... de l'évaluation standard de la littérature scientifique. les nouvelles modalités d'évaluation de l'impact des revues et publications : par les moteurs de recherche (Google Scholar), sur les entrepôts en Open Access (CiteBase et autres statistiques sur les archives ouvertes, revues en ligne...), les enquêtes et autres recensements disciplinaires (CNRS, Faculty of 1000) etc. ; les figures, les modalités, les enjeux, mais aussi les problèmes posés par ces nouvelles formes d'évaluation et par la généralisation de «l'indice de notoriété» comme critère dominant de l'évaluationhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2449485ddc76b1bf3b255baaef987b48a/amaroisamarois2007-11-22T22:36:33+01:00bibliometrie, openaccess, recherche <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Harnad">Stevan Harnad</a>, <a href="/author/Carr">Les Carr</a>, <a href="/author/Brody">Tim Brody</a>, and <a href="/author/Oppenheim">Charles Oppenheim</a> </span><em>Ariadne</em> (<em>April 2003</em>)Thu Nov 22 22:36:33 CET 2007AriadneApril35Mandated online RAE CVs linked to university eprint archives: Enhancing UK research impact and assessment2003bibliometrie, openaccess, recherche Being the only country with a national research assessment exercise [1], the UK is today in a unique position to make a small change that will confer some large benefits. The Funding Councils should mandate that in order to be eligible for Research Assessment and funding, all UK research-active university staff must maintain (I) a standardised online RAE-CV, including all designated RAE performance indicators, chief among them being (II) the full text of every refereed research paper, publicly self-archived in the university's online Eprint Archive and linked to the CV for online harvesting, scientometric analysis and assessment. This will (i) give the UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) far richer, more sensitive and more predictive measures of research productivity and impact, for far less cost and effort (both to the RAE and to the universities preparing their RAE submissions), (ii) increase the uptake and impact of UK research output, by increasing its visibility, accessibility and usage, and (iii) set an example for the rest of the world that will almost certainly be emulated, in both respects: research assessment and research access.