<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:burst="http://xmlns.com/burst/0.1/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/cschie/rules"><title>BibSonomy publications for /user/cschie/rules</title><link>BibSonomyburst/user/cschie/rules</link><description>BibSonomy RSS feed for /user/cschie/rules</description><dc:date>2012-02-16T08:34:57+01:00</dc:date><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20d5dcb3c12a91aad7fbac667d176326f/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29945638ee40394f944131cafd283f5ca/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28ff7416a5fef6cb0a98b89520d59404b/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d38cc79e8d603ac4a6cda3c8144a0c46/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/224d0e14d1d8503a6b8706de08e3c888b/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20b64ad77a057756767e0b22f450fef0b/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d030c6969272a4f0aae5fa4d1c6dfb9f/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e1981a5c4a95fab0fc2f1fa0c1d973d6/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e2c1238def9b33257010678b9bed312f/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/242522918de2864941dc8206000b85c8d/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2bd42d23ea771228b62acca740a042d56/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25bc4687ca8a4de12fdecd640f96716bc/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23c70aa11bf46b99e2ec6617e9993708f/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/296dd7d19467d25677b3304e91e89251e/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2611c4ad5ba8b34aa02157b54df71f480/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/208174947ee40af60da351006dd599e63/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/238794207f5116af842b7e681da8c5422/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/229075fd1b503da35e05d406838366c82/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28293da3a227ee22fde939bb27f9b6cb1/cschie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d47667cde5264bba46970b346f301745/cschie"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20d5dcb3c12a91aad7fbac667d176326f/cschie"><title>Visual Rules Modeling</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20d5dcb3c12a91aad7fbac667d176326f/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-05-05T14:54:23+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Gerd Rewerse Wagner modeling ontology rules visual </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Lukichev&#034;&gt;Gerd Wagner Sergey Lukichev&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;REWERSE, &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;2006&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Gerd"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Rewerse"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Wagner"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/modeling"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ontology"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/visual"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20d5dcb3c12a91aad7fbac667d176326f/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/20d5dcb3c12a91aad7fbac667d176326f/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><swrc:date>Tue May 05 14:54:23 CEST 2009</swrc:date><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="REWERSE"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Visual Rules Modeling</swrc:title><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>Gerd Rewerse Wagner modeling ontology rules visual </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Rules are widely recognized to play an important role in the SemanticWeb. They
are a critical technology component for the early adoption and applications of
knowledge-based techniques in e-business, especially enterprize integration and
B2B e-commerce. This includes, in particular, markup languages for integrity
and derivation rules, such as the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL)[5]
that has recently been proposed as an extension of the Web ontology language
OWL[4]. Rules also play an important role in information systems engineering,
especially in the specification of functional requirements where business rules are
the foundation for capturing and modeling business application logic.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gerd Wagner Sergey Lukichev"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29945638ee40394f944131cafd283f5ca/cschie"><title>Methodological approaches based on business rules</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29945638ee40394f944131cafd283f5ca/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-25T15:11:22+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>approaches business methodology rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Andreescu&#034;&gt;Uta Andreescu&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Informatica Economica&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;3(47):23-27&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;2008&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/approaches"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/methodology"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29945638ee40394f944131cafd283f5ca/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/29945638ee40394f944131cafd283f5ca/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/47/04Andreescu,%20Uta.pdf"/><swrc:date>Wed Mar 25 15:11:22 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Informatica Economica</swrc:journal><swrc:number>47</swrc:number><swrc:pages>23-27</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Methodological approaches based on business rules</swrc:title><swrc:volume>3</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>approaches business methodology rules </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Uta Andreescu"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author><swrc:editor><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Uta Andreescu"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:editor></rdf:Description></burst:publication></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28ff7416a5fef6cb0a98b89520d59404b/cschie"><title>Logical View of Architecture of Business Rules Repository</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28ff7416a5fef6cb0a98b89520d59404b/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-25T15:10:18+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>architecture business repository rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Vasilecas&#034;&gt;Olegas Vasilecas&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Ceponis&#034;&gt;Lauras Ceponis&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Informacijos Mokslai&lt;/em&gt;  (&lt;em&gt;2006&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/architecture"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/repository"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28ff7416a5fef6cb0a98b89520d59404b/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/28ff7416a5fef6cb0a98b89520d59404b/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.leidykla.eu/fileadmin/Informacijos_mokslai/36/139-147.pdf"/><swrc:date>Wed Mar 25 15:10:18 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Informacijos Mokslai</swrc:journal><swrc:number>36</swrc:number><swrc:pages>139-147</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Logical View of Architecture of Business Rules Repository</swrc:title><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>architecture business repository rules </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>An approach to information system development based on business rules emphasizes the importance
of rules and encourages explicit rule modelling. Rule repository supports storage,
sharing and maintenance of rules captured in the process of modelling and development. Repository
architecture that supports three abstraction levels: business system, information system
and software system of rules and core functional requirements defined in the our earlier
papers and in Haggerty et al. and including traceability, meta-data support, versioning integration,
etc. is investigated. A logical view on architecture of rule repository with the main focus
on a conceptual data model is suggested in the paper.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Olegas Vasilecas"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Lauras Ceponis"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>An approach to information system development based on business rules emphasizes the importance
of rules and encourages explicit rule modelling. Rule repository supports storage,
sharing and maintenance of rules captured in the process of modelling and development. Repository
architecture that supports three abstraction levels: business system, information system
and software system of rules and core functional requirements defined in the our earlier
papers and in Haggerty et al. and including traceability, meta-data support, versioning integration,
etc. is investigated. A logical view on architecture of rule repository with the main focus
on a conceptual data model is suggested in the paper.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d38cc79e8d603ac4a6cda3c8144a0c46/cschie"><title>Modeling of Business Processes and Business Rules: An Integrated Methodology</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d38cc79e8d603ac4a6cda3c8144a0c46/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-24T16:23:28+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>business modeling processes rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/zur Muehlen&#034;&gt;Michael zur Muehlen&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Indulska&#034;&gt;Marta Indulska&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Kittel&#034;&gt;Kai Kittel&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems ACIS 2008, &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;Christchurch, New Zealand, &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;Australasian Computer Society, &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;2008&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/modeling"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/processes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d38cc79e8d603ac4a6cda3c8144a0c46/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2d38cc79e8d603ac4a6cda3c8144a0c46/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bsec.canterbury.ac.nz/acis2008/Papers/acis-0182-2008.pdf"/><swrc:date>Tue Mar 24 16:23:28 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:address>Christchurch, New Zealand</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2008)</swrc:booktitle><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Australasian Computer Society"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Modeling of Business Processes and Business Rules: An Integrated Methodology</swrc:title><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>business modeling processes rules </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Michael zur Muehlen"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Marta Indulska"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Kai Kittel"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author><swrc:editor><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Kai Kittel Michael zur Muehlen"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:editor></rdf:Description></burst:publication></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/224d0e14d1d8503a6b8706de08e3c888b/cschie"><title>Modeling languages for business processes and business rules: A representational analysis</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/224d0e14d1d8503a6b8706de08e3c888b/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-24T16:15:52+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>BPMN SRML business modeling process rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/zur Muehlen&#034;&gt;Michael zur Muehlen&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Indulska&#034;&gt;Marta Indulska&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Information Systems&lt;/em&gt;  (&lt;em&gt;2009&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/BPMN"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/SRML"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/modeling"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/process"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/224d0e14d1d8503a6b8706de08e3c888b/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/224d0e14d1d8503a6b8706de08e3c888b/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V0G-4VTKKWF-1/2/4f8b65f17a29765fc22b75c333605614"/><swrc:date>Tue Mar 24 16:15:52 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Information Systems</swrc:journal><swrc:pages> - </swrc:pages><swrc:title>Modeling languages for business processes and business rules: A representational analysis</swrc:title><swrc:volume>In Press, Accepted Manuscript</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2009</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>BPMN SRML business modeling process rules </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Process modeling and rule modeling languages are both used to document organizational policies and procedures. To date, their synergies and overlap are under-researched. Understanding the relationship between the two modeling types would allow organizations to maximize synergies, avoid content duplication, and thus reduce their overall modeling effort. In this paper we use the Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) representation theory to compare the representation capabilities of process and rule modeling languages. We perform a representational analysis of four rule modeling specifications: The Simple Rule Markup Language (SRML), the Semantic Web Rules Language (SWRL), the Production Rule Representation (PRR) and the Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR) specification. We compare their BWW representation capabilities with those of four popular conceptual process modeling languages. In our analysis we focus on the aspects of maximum ontological completeness and minimum ontological overlap. The outcome of this study shows that no single language is internally complete with respect to the BWW representation model. We also show that a combination of two languages, in particular SRML and BPMN, appears to be better suited for combined process and rule modeling than any of these modeling languages used independently.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0306-4379" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2009.02.006" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Michael zur Muehlen"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Marta Indulska"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>Process modeling and rule modeling languages are both used to document organizational policies and procedures. To date, their synergies and overlap are under-researched. Understanding the relationship between the two modeling types would allow organizations to maximize synergies, avoid content duplication, and thus reduce their overall modeling effort. In this paper we use the Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) representation theory to compare the representation capabilities of process and rule modeling languages. We perform a representational analysis of four rule modeling specifications: The Simple Rule Markup Language (SRML), the Semantic Web Rules Language (SWRL), the Production Rule Representation (PRR) and the Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR) specification. We compare their BWW representation capabilities with those of four popular conceptual process modeling languages. In our analysis we focus on the aspects of maximum ontological completeness and minimum ontological overlap. The outcome of this study shows that no single language is internally complete with respect to the BWW representation model. We also show that a combination of two languages, in particular SRML and BPMN, appears to be better suited for combined process and rule modeling than any of these modeling languages used independently.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20b64ad77a057756767e0b22f450fef0b/cschie"><title>On the Nature of Business Rules</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20b64ad77a057756767e0b22f450fef0b/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-18T15:22:49+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Dietz OMG business definition ontology rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Dietz&#034;&gt;Jan L. G. Dietz&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Advances in Enterprise Engineering I&lt;/em&gt;  (&lt;em&gt;2008&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Dietz"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/OMG"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/definition"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ontology"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20b64ad77a057756767e0b22f450fef0b/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/20b64ad77a057756767e0b22f450fef0b/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68644-6_1"/><swrc:date>Wed Mar 18 15:22:49 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Advances in Enterprise Engineering I</swrc:journal><swrc:pages>1--15</swrc:pages><swrc:title>On the Nature of Business Rules</swrc:title><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>Dietz OMG business definition ontology rules </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Business rules are in the center of attention, both in the ‘business world’ and in the ‘ICT applications world’. Recently, the OMG has completed a major study in defining the notion of business rule and its associated notions. On closer look, however, the definitions provided appear to be not as rigid and precise as one would hope and as deemed necessary. Based on the consistent and coherent theoretical framework of Enterprise Ontology, several clarifications of the core notions regarding business rules are presented. They are illustrated by means of a small example case.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Jan L. G. Dietz"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>Business rules are in the center of attention, both in the ‘business world’ and in the ‘ICT applications world’. Recently, the OMG has completed a major study in defining the notion of business rule and its associated notions. On closer look, however, the definitions provided appear to be not as rigid and precise as one would hope and as deemed necessary. Based on the consistent and coherent theoretical framework of Enterprise Ontology, several clarifications of the core notions regarding business rules are presented. They are illustrated by means of a small example case.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d030c6969272a4f0aae5fa4d1c6dfb9f/cschie"><title>Using Neural Network Rule Extraction and Decision Tables for Credit-Risk Evaluation</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d030c6969272a4f0aae5fa4d1c6dfb9f/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-13T11:08:56+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Neural capture classification credit decision evaluation explanatory extraction knowledge learning management methods networks risk rules science techniques </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Baesens&#034;&gt;Bart Baesens&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Setiono&#034;&gt;Rudy Setiono&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Mues&#034;&gt;Christophe Mues&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Vanthienen&#034;&gt;Jan Vanthienen&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Management Science&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;49(3):312--329&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;2003&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Neural"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/capture"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/classification"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credit"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/decision"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/explanatory"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/extraction"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/knowledge"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/learning"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/management"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/methods"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/networks"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/risk"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/science"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/techniques"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d030c6969272a4f0aae5fa4d1c6dfb9f/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2d030c6969272a4f0aae5fa4d1c6dfb9f/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.jstor.org/stable/4133928"/><swrc:date>Fri Mar 13 11:08:56 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Management Science</swrc:journal><swrc:number>3</swrc:number><swrc:pages>312--329</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="INFORMS"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Using Neural Network Rule Extraction and Decision Tables for Credit-Risk Evaluation</swrc:title><swrc:volume>49</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2003</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>Neural capture classification credit decision evaluation explanatory extraction knowledge learning management methods networks risk rules science techniques </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Credit-risk evaluation is a very challenging and important management science problem in the domain of financial analysis. Many classification methods have been suggested in the literature to tackle this problem. Neural networks, especially, have received a lot of attention because of their universal approximation property. However, a major drawback associated with the use of neural networks for decision making is their lack of explanation capability. While they can achieve a high predictive accuracy rate, the reasoning behind how they reach their decisions is not readily available. In this paper, we present the results from analysing three real-life credit-risk data sets using neural network rule extraction techniques. Clarifying the neural network decisions by explanatory rules that capture the learned knowledge embedded in the networks can help the credit-risk manager in explaining why a particular applicant is classified as either bad or good. Furthermore, we also discuss how these rules can be visualized as a decision table in a compact and intuitive graphical format that facilitates easy consultation. It is concluded that neural network rule extraction and decision tables are powerful management tools that allow us to build advanced and user-friendly decision-support systems for credit-risk evaluation.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="00251909" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Copyright © 2003 INFORMS" swrc:key="copyright"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Mar., 2003" swrc:key="jstor_formatteddate"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="primary_article" swrc:key="jstor_articletype"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Bart Baesens"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Rudy Setiono"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Christophe Mues"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Jan Vanthienen"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>Credit-risk evaluation is a very challenging and important management science problem in the domain of financial analysis. Many classification methods have been suggested in the literature to tackle this problem. Neural networks, especially, have received a lot of attention because of their universal approximation property. However, a major drawback associated with the use of neural networks for decision making is their lack of explanation capability. While they can achieve a high predictive accuracy rate, the reasoning behind how they reach their decisions is not readily available. In this paper, we present the results from analysing three real-life credit-risk data sets using neural network rule extraction techniques. Clarifying the neural network decisions by explanatory rules that capture the learned knowledge embedded in the networks can help the credit-risk manager in explaining why a particular applicant is classified as either bad or good. Furthermore, we also discuss how these rules can be visualized as a decision table in a compact and intuitive graphical format that facilitates easy consultation. It is concluded that neural network rule extraction and decision tables are powerful management tools that allow us to build advanced and user-friendly decision-support systems for credit-risk evaluation.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e1981a5c4a95fab0fc2f1fa0c1d973d6/cschie"><title>Enterprise Modeling and Decision-Support for Automating the Business Rules Lifecycle</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e1981a5c4a95fab0fc2f1fa0c1d973d6/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-13T11:06:19+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>automation business decision enterprise lifecycle modeling rules support </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Rosca&#034;&gt;Daniela Rosca&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Greenspan&#034;&gt;Sol Greenspan&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Wild&#034;&gt;Chris Wild&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Automated Software Engg.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;9(4):361--404&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;2002&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/automation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/decision"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/enterprise"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/lifecycle"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/modeling"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/support"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e1981a5c4a95fab0fc2f1fa0c1d973d6/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2e1981a5c4a95fab0fc2f1fa0c1d973d6/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=592091"/><swrc:date>Fri Mar 13 11:06:19 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:address>Hingham, MA, USA</swrc:address><swrc:journal>Automated Software Engg.</swrc:journal><swrc:number>4</swrc:number><swrc:pages>361--404</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Kluwer Academic Publishers"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Enterprise Modeling and Decision-Support for Automating the Business Rules Lifecycle</swrc:title><swrc:volume>9</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2002</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>automation business decision enterprise lifecycle modeling rules support </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0928-8910" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020372710433" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Daniela Rosca"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Sol Greenspan"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Chris Wild"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>Business rules represent policies, procedures and constraints regarding how an enterprise conducts its business. To get the full benefits of modeling business rules requires an approach to managing them through their full lifecycle, from acquisition through deployment and evolution. The research reported in this paper is aimed at determining what infrastructure capabilities are needed to provide this lifecycle support. The solution embodies a modeling framework that captures the structure of the enterprise, in terms of which the business rules can be expressed, and decision-support capabilities for reasoning about and deriving business rules. The paper demonstrates the possibility of automatic support of the business rules lifecycle by automatically generating business rules from the captured information, along with data representing domain assumptions in a case study (the London Ambulance System). A system was implemented to illustrate the methodology and to demonstrate the feasibility of the approach. The methodology also gives guidance on how to deal with pragmatically important situations such as rules that involve both automated and human tasks, nondeterministic rules, and goal-oriented versus operational rules.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e2c1238def9b33257010678b9bed312f/cschie"><title>A methodology and tool support for managing business rules in organisations</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e2c1238def9b33257010678b9bed312f/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-13T10:58:13+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>business information methodology organisation paper requirements rules systems </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Bajec&#034;&gt;Marko Bajec&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Krisper&#034;&gt;Marjan Krisper&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Inf. Syst.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;30(6):423--443&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;2005&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/information"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/methodology"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/organisation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/paper"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/requirements"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/systems"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e2c1238def9b33257010678b9bed312f/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2e2c1238def9b33257010678b9bed312f/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1086605"/><swrc:date>Fri Mar 13 10:58:13 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:address>Oxford, UK, UK</swrc:address><swrc:journal>Inf. Syst.</swrc:journal><swrc:number>6</swrc:number><swrc:pages>423--443</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Elsevier Science Ltd."/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>A methodology and tool support for managing business rules in organisations</swrc:title><swrc:volume>30</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2005</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>business information methodology organisation paper requirements rules systems </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Business rules are evidently important for organisations as they describe how they are doing business. Their value has also been recognised within the information system (IS) domain, mostly because of their ability to make applications flexible and amenable to change. In this paper, we propose a methodology that helps business people and developers to keep business rules at the business level inline with the rules that are implemented at the system level. In contrast to several existing approaches that primarily focus on business rules in the scope of an application, our methodology addresses the entire IS of an organisation. The paper also describes requirements for a tool support that would be appropriate to support the methodology.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0306-4379" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2004.05.003" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Marko Bajec"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Marjan Krisper"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>Business rules are evidently important for organisations as they describe how they are doing business. Their value has also been recognised within the information system (IS) domain, mostly because of their ability to make applications flexible and amenable to change. In this paper, we propose a methodology that helps business people and developers to keep business rules at the business level inline with the rules that are implemented at the system level. In contrast to several existing approaches that primarily focus on business rules in the scope of an application, our methodology addresses the entire IS of an organisation. The paper also describes requirements for a tool support that would be appropriate to support the methodology.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/242522918de2864941dc8206000b85c8d/cschie"><title>The Handbook of Applied Expert Systems</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/242522918de2864941dc8206000b85c8d/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-09T17:52:08+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>AI artificial case-based expert intelligence networks neural rule-based rules systems </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Liebowitz&#034;&gt;Jay Liebowitz&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;CRC Press, Inc., &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;Boca Raton, FL, USA, &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;1997&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;em&gt;http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=524135
		    .
	    &lt;/em&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/AI"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/artificial"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/case-based"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/expert"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/intelligence"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/networks"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/neural"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rule-based"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/systems"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/242522918de2864941dc8206000b85c8d/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/242522918de2864941dc8206000b85c8d/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Book"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://books.google.com/books?id=6DNgIzFNSZsC&amp;pg=PT150&amp;lpg=PT150&amp;dq=Patrick+Harrison+Joseph+Kovalchik+Expert+Systems+and+Uncertainty&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=A31deHRyQY&amp;sig=RdTLpTx5EZbmcTyAKskTasO0x2o&amp;hl=de&amp;ei=00i1SfbcNY-O_gbIxvDLBA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;resnum=3&amp;ct=result"/><swrc:date>Mon Mar 09 17:52:08 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:address>Boca Raton, FL, USA</swrc:address><swrc:note>http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=524135</swrc:note><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="CRC Press, Inc."/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>The Handbook of Applied Expert Systems</swrc:title><swrc:year>1997</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>AI artificial case-based expert intelligence networks neural rule-based rules systems </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0849331064" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Jay Liebowitz"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>The Handbook of Applied Expert Systems is a landmark work dedicatedsolely to this rapidly advancing area of study. Edited by Jay Liebowitz, a professor, author, and consultant known around the world for his work in the field, this authoritative source covers the latest expert system technologies, applications, methodologies, and practices. The book features contributions from more than 40 of the world&#039;s foremost expert systems authorities in industry, government, and academia.

The Handbook is organized into two major sections. The first section explains expert systems technologies while the second section focuses on applied examples in a wide variety of industries. Key topics covered include fuzzy systems, genetic algorithm development, machine learning, knowledge representation, and much more.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2bd42d23ea771228b62acca740a042d56/cschie"><title>On the Expressiveness of Rule-based Systems for Reasoning with Uncertainty.</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2bd42d23ea771228b62acca740a042d56/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-09T15:53:23+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>based expressiveness reasoning rules systems uncertainty </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Heckerman&#034;&gt;David Heckerman&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Horvitz&#034;&gt;Eric Horvitz&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;AAAI, &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;page 121-126. &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;1987&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/based"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/expressiveness"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/reasoning"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/systems"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/uncertainty"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2bd42d23ea771228b62acca740a042d56/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2bd42d23ea771228b62acca740a042d56/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/1987/AAAI87-022.pdf"/><swrc:date>Mon Mar 09 15:53:23 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:booktitle>AAAI</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>121-126</swrc:pages><swrc:title>On the Expressiveness of Rule-based Systems for Reasoning with Uncertainty.</swrc:title><swrc:year>1987</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>based expressiveness reasoning rules systems uncertainty </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="2002-01-03" swrc:key="date"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="David Heckerman"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Eric Horvitz"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25bc4687ca8a4de12fdecd640f96716bc/cschie"><title>Merging Model Driven Architecture and Semantic Web for Business Rules Generation</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25bc4687ca8a4de12fdecd640f96716bc/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-09T15:12:32+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>MDA architecture business model rules semantic web </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Diouf&#034;&gt;Mouhamed Diouf&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Maabout&#034;&gt;Sofian Maabout&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Musumbu&#034;&gt;Kaninda Musumbu&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Web Reasoning and Rule Systems&lt;/em&gt;  (&lt;em&gt;2007&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/MDA"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/architecture"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/model"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/semantic"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/web"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25bc4687ca8a4de12fdecd640f96716bc/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/25bc4687ca8a4de12fdecd640f96716bc/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72982-2_9"/><swrc:date>Mon Mar 09 15:12:32 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Web Reasoning and Rule Systems</swrc:journal><swrc:pages>118--132</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Merging Model Driven Architecture and Semantic Web for Business Rules Generation</swrc:title><swrc:year>2007</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>MDA architecture business model rules semantic web </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Business rules are statements that express (certain parts of) a business policy, defining terms and defining or constraining
the operation of an entreprise, in a declarative manner. The business rule approach is more and more used due to the factthat in such systems, business experts can maintain the complex behavior of their application in a “zero development” environment.There exist more and more business rule management systems (BRMS) and rule engines, adding new needs in the business rulescommunity. Currently the main requirement in this domain is having a standard language for representing business rules, facilitatingtheir integration and share. Works for solving this lack are in progress at e.g OMG and W3C.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Mouhamed Diouf"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Sofian Maabout"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Kaninda Musumbu"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>Business rules are statements that express (certain parts of) a business policy, defining terms and defining or constraining</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23c70aa11bf46b99e2ec6617e9993708f/cschie"><title>Knowledge representation concepts for automated SLA management</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23c70aa11bf46b99e2ec6617e9993708f/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-09T15:12:15+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>ECA Paschke SLA automated concept infrastructure knowledge management representation rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Paschke&#034;&gt;Adrian Paschke&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Bichler&#034;&gt;Martin Bichler&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Decis. Support Syst.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;46(1):187--205&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;2008&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ECA"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Paschke"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/SLA"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/automated"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/concept"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/infrastructure"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/knowledge"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/management"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/representation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23c70aa11bf46b99e2ec6617e9993708f/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/23c70aa11bf46b99e2ec6617e9993708f/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1464574"/><swrc:date>Mon Mar 09 15:12:15 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:address>Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The Netherlands</swrc:address><swrc:journal>Decis. Support Syst.</swrc:journal><swrc:number>1</swrc:number><swrc:pages>187--205</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Elsevier Science Publishers B. V."/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Knowledge representation concepts for automated SLA management</swrc:title><swrc:volume>46</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>ECA Paschke SLA automated concept infrastructure knowledge management representation rules </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Outsourcing of complex IT infrastructure to IT service providers has increased substantially during the past years. IT service providers must be able to fulfil their service-quality commitments based upon predefined Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with the service customer. They need to manage, execute and maintain thousands of SLAs for different customers and different types of services, which needs new levels of flexibility and automation not available with the current technology. The complexity of contractual logic in SLAs requires new forms of knowledge representation to automatically draw inferences and execute contractual agreemen ts. A logic-based approach provides several advantages including automated rule chaining allowing for compact knowledge representation as well as flexibility to adapt to rapidly changing business requirements. We suggest logical formalisms for the representation and enforcement of SLA rules and describe a proof-of-concept implementation. The article describes selected formalisms of the ContractLog KR and their adequacy for automated SLA management and presents results of experiments and examples from common industry use cases to demonstrate the expressiveness of the language and the scalability of the approach.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0167-9236" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.008" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Adrian Paschke"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Martin Bichler"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>Outsourcing of complex IT infrastructure to IT service providers has increased substantially during the past years. IT service providers must be able to fulfil their service-quality commitments based upon predefined Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with the service customer. They need to manage, execute and maintain thousands of SLAs for different customers and different types of services, which needs new levels of flexibility and automation not available with the current technology. The complexity of contractual logic in SLAs requires new forms of knowledge representation to automatically draw inferences and execute contractual agreemen ts. A logic-based approach provides several advantages including automated rule chaining allowing for compact knowledge representation as well as flexibility to adapt to rapidly changing business requirements. We suggest logical formalisms for the representation and enforcement of SLA rules and describe a proof-of-concept implementation. The article describes selected formalisms of the ContractLog KR and their adequacy for automated SLA management and presents results of experiments and examples from common industry use cases to demonstrate the expressiveness of the language and the scalability of the approach.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/296dd7d19467d25677b3304e91e89251e/cschie"><title>Event-driven rules for sensing and responding to business situations</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/296dd7d19467d25677b3304e91e89251e/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-09T15:11:25+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>ECA SOA business coupled event event-driven loosely patterns respond rules sense situation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Schiefer&#034;&gt;Josef Schiefer&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Rozsnyai&#034;&gt;Szabolcs Rozsnyai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Rauscher&#034;&gt;Christian Rauscher&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Saurer&#034;&gt;Gerd Saurer&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;DEBS &amp;#039;07: Proceedings of the 2007 inaugural international conference on Distributed event-based systems, &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;page 198--205. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;New York, NY, USA, &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;ACM, &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;2007&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ECA"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/SOA"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/coupled"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/event"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/event-driven"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/loosely"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/patterns"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/respond"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/sense"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/situation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/296dd7d19467d25677b3304e91e89251e/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/296dd7d19467d25677b3304e91e89251e/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1266934"/><swrc:date>Mon Mar 09 15:11:25 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:address>New York, NY, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>DEBS &#039;07: Proceedings of the 2007 inaugural international conference on Distributed event-based systems</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>198--205</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="ACM"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Event-driven rules for sensing and responding to business situations</swrc:title><swrc:year>2007</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>ECA SOA business coupled event event-driven loosely patterns respond rules sense situation </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Event-based systems have been developed and used to implement networked and adaptive business environments based on loosely coupled systems in order to respond faster to critical business events. In this paper, we introduce a rule management system which is able to sense and evaluate events in order to respond to changes in a business environment or customer needs. It enables users to graphically compose comprehensive event-triggered rules, which can be used to control the processing of services. For the definition of a rule set, users can independently define event conditions, event patterns and correlation-related information which can be combined for modeling complex business situations. We have fully implemented the proposed system with a service-oriented approach and illustrate our approach with an order management business case.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Toronto, Ontario, Canada" swrc:key="location"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-1-59593-665-3" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1266894.1266934" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Josef Schiefer"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Szabolcs Rozsnyai"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Christian Rauscher"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gerd Saurer"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>Event-based systems have been developed and used to implement networked and adaptive business environments based on loosely coupled systems in order to respond faster to critical business events. In this paper, we introduce a rule management system which is able to sense and evaluate events in order to respond to changes in a business environment or customer needs. It enables users to graphically compose comprehensive event-triggered rules, which can be used to control the processing of services. For the definition of a rule set, users can independently define event conditions, event patterns and correlation-related information which can be combined for modeling complex business situations. We have fully implemented the proposed system with a service-oriented approach and illustrate our approach with an order management business case.</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2611c4ad5ba8b34aa02157b54df71f480/cschie"><title>Business Process and Business Rule Modeling: A Representational Analysis</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2611c4ad5ba8b34aa02157b54df71f480/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-03T13:29:52+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>BPMN BWW SBVR analysis business modeling process representational rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/zur Muehlen&#034;&gt;Michael zur Muehlen&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Indulska&#034;&gt;Marta Indulska&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Kamp&#034;&gt;Gerrit Kamp&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;EDOCW &amp;#039;07: Proceedings of the 2007 Eleventh International IEEE EDOC Conference Workshop, &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;page 189--196. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;Washington, DC, USA, &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;IEEE Computer Society, &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;2007&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/BPMN"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/BWW"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/SBVR"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/analysis"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/modeling"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/process"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/representational"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2611c4ad5ba8b34aa02157b54df71f480/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2611c4ad5ba8b34aa02157b54df71f480/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1443132"/><swrc:date>Tue Mar 03 13:29:52 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:address>Washington, DC, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>EDOCW &#039;07: Proceedings of the 2007 Eleventh International IEEE EDOC Conference Workshop</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>189--196</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="IEEE Computer Society"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Business Process and Business Rule Modeling: A Representational Analysis</swrc:title><swrc:year>2007</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>BPMN BWW SBVR analysis business modeling process representational rules </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Process modeling and rule modeling languages are both used to document organizational policies and procedures. However, little work has been done to understand their synergies and overlap. Understanding the relationship between the two modeling types would allow organizations to maximize synergies and reduce their modeling effort. In this paper we use the well-established Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) representation theory to compare the representation capabilities of both types of languages. We perform a representational analysis of two rule modeling languages, viz., SRML and SBVR. We compare their representation capabilities with those of four popular conceptual business process modeling languages, and focus on the aspects of maximum ontological completeness and minimum ontological overlap. The outcome of this study shows that no single language is internally complete with respect to the BWW representation model and that a combination of two languages, viz. SRML and BPMN, is better suited for process modeling than any single modeling language.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-0-7695-3338-4" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2007.8" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Michael zur Muehlen"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Marta Indulska"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gerrit Kamp"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>Business Process and Business Rule Modeling</description></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/208174947ee40af60da351006dd599e63/cschie"><title>A Lifecycle Approach towards Business Rules Management</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/208174947ee40af60da351006dd599e63/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-02-18T14:41:04+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>approach architecture business lifecycle management rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Nelson&#034;&gt;M.L. Nelson&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Rariden&#034;&gt;R.L. Rariden&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Sen&#034;&gt;R. Sen&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual&lt;/em&gt;  (&lt;em&gt;January 2008&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/approach"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/architecture"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/lifecycle"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/management"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/208174947ee40af60da351006dd599e63/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/208174947ee40af60da351006dd599e63/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><swrc:date>Wed Feb 18 14:41:04 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual</swrc:journal><swrc:month>Jan.</swrc:month><swrc:pages>113-113</swrc:pages><swrc:title>A Lifecycle Approach towards Business Rules Management</swrc:title><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>approach architecture business lifecycle management rules </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Automating business rules management has provided significant benefits including greater control, improved flexibility, and the ability to rapidly deploy business rules across processes, information systems and channels (Web, legacy, wireless and otherwise). These benefits, in addition to trends in service orientated architectures, Web semantics, and business process management, have spawned an emerging business rules engine (BRE) market. Despite these developments, little has been published in MIS journals that examine the management of business rules management systems (BRMS) development and deployments. Making use of structuration research methods, we collect data from leading developers, end- users, researchers and thought-leaders from the industry. Data collection results revealed a business rules management lifecycle inclusive of these steps: align, capture, organize, author, distribute, test, apply, maintain. The contextual influences, actors, inputs, outputs and artifacts are identified in each step. Academic and managerial contributions, as well as recommendations for future research are provided.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="1530-1605" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1109/HICSS.2008.25" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="M.L. Nelson"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="R.L. Rariden"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="R. Sen"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/238794207f5116af842b7e681da8c5422/cschie"><title>Patterns of Business Rules to Enable Agile Business Processes</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/238794207f5116af842b7e681da8c5422/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-02-17T18:50:00+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>IBM WebSphere agile architecture automation business integration process re-engineering rules service systems </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Graml&#034;&gt;T. Graml&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Bracht&#034;&gt;R. Bracht&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Spies&#034;&gt;M. Spies&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2007. EDOC 2007. 11th IEEE International&lt;/em&gt;  (&lt;em&gt;October 2007&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/IBM"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/WebSphere"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/agile"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/architecture"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/automation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/integration"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/process"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/re-engineering"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/service"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/systems"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/238794207f5116af842b7e681da8c5422/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/238794207f5116af842b7e681da8c5422/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><swrc:date>Tue Feb 17 18:50:00 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2007. EDOC 2007. 11th IEEE International</swrc:journal><swrc:month>Oct.</swrc:month><swrc:pages>365-365</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Patterns of Business Rules to Enable Agile Business Processes</swrc:title><swrc:year>2007</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>IBM WebSphere agile architecture automation business integration process re-engineering rules service systems </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>A problem of today&#039;s standard business process (BP) automation systems is that they are too rigid to cope with changing business demands, especially for long running BPs. A solution to overcome this problem is to combine BPs with business rules (BR). State of the art BP automation systems are based on Web service (WS) technology and use WS composition languages, for example BPEL, for abstract and executable BPs. On the other hand, most of today&#039;s implementations use BRs mostly to make calculations and to adapt simple decisions to business users without full integration into a BP automation system. We will show that BP execution and BR functionality can be integrated properly in a standard service oriented architecture. This finding will be applied in a new approach of configuring BPs through using BRs. The assumption is that if one considers BRs already while modeling a BP, more advanced BP aspects like decisions, data constraints and control flow can be made agile and adaptive during run-time. We present multiple solutions demonstrating how BRs can be used to obtain different aspects ofBP agility. Described as BP Modeling Patterns, our solutions give insight on how agile BPs can be implemented with current BP automation technology. We implemented them using IBM WebSphere integration developer and IBM WebSphere process server.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="1541-7719" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1109/EDOC.2007.35" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="T. Graml"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="R. Bracht"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="M. Spies"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/229075fd1b503da35e05d406838366c82/cschie"><title>Business Rule-oriented Conceptual Modeling</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/229075fd1b503da35e05d406838366c82/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-02-17T18:28:02+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>business conceptual modeling rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Herbst&#034;&gt;Holger Herbst&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;(&lt;em&gt;1997&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/conceptual"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/modeling"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/229075fd1b503da35e05d406838366c82/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/229075fd1b503da35e05d406838366c82/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#PhDThesis"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://books.google.com/books?id=uIRul0nO8RYC&amp;hl=de"/><swrc:date>Tue Feb 17 18:28:02 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:title>Business Rule-oriented Conceptual Modeling</swrc:title><swrc:year>1997</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>business conceptual modeling rules </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Holger Herbst"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28293da3a227ee22fde939bb27f9b6cb1/cschie"><title>Regelbasierte Entwicklung betrieblicher Informationssysteme. Gestaltung flexibler Informationssysteme durch explizite Modellierung der Geschäftslogik</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28293da3a227ee22fde939bb27f9b6cb1/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-02-17T18:10:55+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Endl diss modeling rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Endl&#034;&gt;Rainer Endl&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bern, &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;2004&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Endl"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/diss"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/modeling"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28293da3a227ee22fde939bb27f9b6cb1/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/28293da3a227ee22fde939bb27f9b6cb1/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#PhDThesis"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.ie.iwi.unibe.ch/publikationen/books/"/><swrc:date>Tue Feb 17 18:10:55 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:school><swrc:University swrc:name="Bern"/></swrc:school><swrc:title>Regelbasierte Entwicklung betrieblicher Informationssysteme. Gestaltung flexibler Informationssysteme durch explizite Modellierung der Geschäftslogik</swrc:title><swrc:year>2004</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>Endl diss modeling rules </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Rainer Endl"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d47667cde5264bba46970b346f301745/cschie"><title>Swiss Workflow Management in Distributed Environments Modeling Processes and Workflows by Business Rules</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d47667cde5264bba46970b346f301745/cschie</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-02-17T18:04:51+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>distributed environment management modeling process rules swiss workflow </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span class=&#034;authorEditorList&#034;&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;/author/Endl&#034;&gt;Rainer Endl&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Knolmayer&#034;&gt;Gerhard Knolmayer&lt;/a&gt;,  and &lt;a href=&#034;/author/Pfahrer&#034;&gt;Marcel Pfahrer&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;(&lt;em&gt;1998&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/distributed"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/environment"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/management"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/modeling"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/process"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/swiss"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/workflow"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d47667cde5264bba46970b346f301745/cschie"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2d47667cde5264bba46970b346f301745/cschie"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Misc"/><swrc:date>Tue Feb 17 18:04:51 CET 2009</swrc:date><swrc:title>Swiss Workflow Management in Distributed Environments Modeling Processes and Workflows by Business Rules</swrc:title><swrc:year>1998</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>distributed environment management modeling process rules swiss workflow </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Rainer Endl"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gerhard Knolmayer"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Marcel Pfahrer"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></burst:publication><description>Swiss Workflow Management in Distributed Environments Modeling Processes and Workflows by Business Rules</description></item></rdf:RDF>
