http://www.bibsonomy.org/burst/user/hotho/2.0BibSonomy BuRST Feed for /user/hotho/2.02008-09-05T07:54:01+02:00HT: HT '08, Logsonomy - social information ...http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c7f43f2f922de1e7febedd10347e80cb/hothohotho2008-08-28T08:21:19+02:00myown logsonomy folksonomy web 2008 2.0 <span style="color:#555555;">Beate <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Krause">Krause</a> und Robert <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Jäschke">J&#228;schke</a> und Andreas <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Hotho">Hotho</a> und Gerd <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Stumme">Stumme</a> </span><em>HT '08: Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, </em><em>Seite157--166. </em><em>New York, NY, USA, </em><em>ACM, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Thu Aug 28 08:21:19 CEST 2008New York, NY, USAHT '08: Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia157--166Logsonomy - social information retrieval with logdata2008myown logsonomy folksonomy web 2008 2.0 Social bookmarking systems constitute an established part of the Web 2.0. In such systems users describe bookmarks by keywords called tags. The structure behind these social systems, called folksonomies, can be viewed as a tripartite hypergraph of user, tag and resource nodes. This underlying network shows specific structural properties that explain its growth and the possibility of serendipitous exploration. Today's search engines represent the gateway to retrieve information from the World Wide Web. Short queries typically consisting of two to three words describe a user's information need. In response to the displayed results of the search engine, users click on the links of the result page as they expect the answer to be of relevance. This clickdata can be represented as a folksonomy in which queries are descriptions of clicked URLs. The resulting network structure, which we will term logsonomy is very similar to the one of folksonomies. In order to find out about its properties, we analyze the topological characteristics of the tripartite hypergraph of queries, users and bookmarks on a large snapshot of del.icio.us and on query logs of two large search engines. All of the three datasets show small world properties. The tagging behavior of users, which is explained by preferential attachment of the tags in social bookmark systems, is reflected in the distribution of single query words in search engines. We can conclude that the clicking behaviour of search engine users based on the displayed search results and the tagging behaviour of social bookmarking users is driven by similar dynamics.Welcome to IEEE Xplore 2.0: CoolRank: A Social Solution for Ranking Bookmarked Web Resourceshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24671fb1c606e3d7f559bb25d9b20e47d/hothohotho2008-07-02T16:57:41+02:00toread folksonomy ranking * folkrank web 2.0 <span style="color:#555555;">H.S. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Al-Khalifa">Al-Khalifa</a> </span><em>Innovations in Information Technology, 2007. Innovations '07. 4th International Conference on, </em><em>Seite208-212. </em>(<em>2007</em>)Wed Jul 02 16:57:41 CEST 2008Innovations in Information Technology, 2007. Innovations '07. 4th International Conference on208-212CoolRank: A Social Solution for Ranking Bookmarked Web Resources2007toread folksonomy ranking * folkrank web 2.0 Users tag resources for a variety of reasons and using a variety of conventions. The tags that they provide are stored in social bookmarking services, so these services can provide a rich gateway to a wide and interesting quantity of web resources. The cognitive effort that has gone into making these tags has presumably added value to the description of the resource. In this work we utilize the quantitative value of these tags for ranking bookmarked web resources in social bookmarking services. Our proposed solution is called CoolRank, a simple and intuitive model to rank bookmarked web resources in a social bookmarking service, such as del.icio.us. CoolRank makes use of both quantitative information, based on the number of people who have bookmarked a web resource, and subjective information, based on the words people have used in their tags.Distributed feature extraction in a p2p settinghttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e5eba80e58b4532a3fd3bcf50994734e/hothohotho2008-01-25T20:42:37+01:00summerschool tagging dm web 2.0 kdubiq mining p2p music <span style="color:#555555;">Michael <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Wurst">Wurst</a> und Katharina <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Morik">Morik</a> </span><em>Future Gener. Comput. Syst.</em><em>23(1):69--75</em>(<em>2007</em>)Fri Jan 25 20:42:37 CET 2008Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The NetherlandsFuture Gener. Comput. Syst.169--75Distributed feature extraction in a p2p setting: a case study232007summerschool tagging dm web 2.0 kdubiq mining p2p music Vocabulary growth in collaborative tagging systemshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24d6bfbd16ba976f4a4aae985c2a92449/hothohotho2007-12-04T10:29:43+01:002.0 web tagging collaborative systems vocabulary <span style="color:#555555;">Ciro <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Cattuto">Cattuto</a> und Andrea <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Baldassarri">Baldassarri</a> und Vito D. P. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Servedio">Servedio</a> und Vittorio <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Loreto">Loreto</a> </span>(<em>2007</em>)Tue Dec 04 10:29:43 CET 2007Vocabulary growth in collaborative tagging systems20072.0 web tagging collaborative systems vocabulary BibSonomy::bibtex::{Bibliothek 2. 0: Die Zukunft der Bibliothek?}http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b2f1e3b766f66f01997a086ac024f8dd/hothohotho2007-10-10T10:58:53+02:002.0 web library connotea bibliothek <span style="color:#555555;">Patrick <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/DANOWSKI">DANOWSKI</a> und Lambert <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/HELLER">HELLER</a> </span><em>Bibliotheksdienst</em><em>40(11):1259--1271</em>(<em>2006</em>)Wed Oct 10 10:58:53 CEST 2007Bibliotheksdienst111259--1271{Bibliothek 2. 0: Die Zukunft der Bibliothek?}4020062.0 web library connotea bibliothek web2.0 papershttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28b100f88154692615b1e31e2e243e78c/hothohotho2007-10-04T11:53:25+02:00folksonomy tagging 2.0 web toread sosbuch <span style="color:#555555;">Cameron <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Marlow">Marlow</a> und Mor <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Naaman">Naaman</a> und Danah <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Boyd">Boyd</a> und Marc <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Davis">Davis</a> </span><em>Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006, </em><em>May2006. </em>Thu Oct 04 11:53:25 CEST 2007Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006May{Position Paper, Tagging, Taxonomy, Flickr, Article, ToRead}2006folksonomy tagging 2.0 web toread sosbuch In recent years, tagging systems have become increasingly popular. These systems enable users to add keywords (i.e., “tags”) to Internet resources (e.g., web pages, images, videos) without relying on a controlled vocabulary. Tagging systems have the potential to improve search, spam detection, reputation systems, and personal organization while introducing new modalities of social communication and opportunities for data mining. This potential is largely due to the social structure that underlies many of the current systems. Despite the rapid expansion of applications that support tagging of resources, tagging systems are still not well studied or understood. In this paper, we provide a short description of the academic related work to date. We offer a model of tagging systems, specifically in the context of web-based systems, to help us illustrate the possible benefits of these tools. Since many such systems already exist, we provide a taxonomy of tagging systems to help inform their analysis and design, and thus enable researchers to frame and compare evidence for the sustainability of such systems. We also provide a simple taxonomy of incentives and contribution models to inform potential evaluative frameworks. While this work does not present comprehensive empirical results, we present a preliminary study of the photosharing and tagging system Flickr to demonstrate our model and explore some of the issues in one sample system. This analysis helps us outline and motivate possible future directions of research in tagging systems.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26929599cc8fbdc408282907eeec37204/hothohotho2007-01-26T16:22:26+01:00socialsoftware clustering 2.0 sosbuch folksonomy kdubiq tagging summerschool web ontology <span style="color:#555555;">Peter <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Mika">Mika</a> </span><em>International Semantic Web Conference, </em><em>Seite522-536. </em><em>Springer, </em>(<em>2005</em>)Fri Jan 26 16:22:26 CET 2007International Semantic Web Conference522-536LNCSOntologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics2005socialsoftware clustering 2.0 sosbuch folksonomy kdubiq tagging summerschool web ontology Amazon.de: Web 2.0. Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien: Bücher: Tom Albyhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ad1e12ff8ce3f6f1f7f97bd29236060b/hothohotho2007-01-22T09:32:52+01:00web 2.0 toread <span style="color:#555555;">Tom <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Alby">Alby</a> </span>(<em>2006</em>)Mon Jan 22 09:32:52 CET 2007Web 2.0. Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien2006web 2.0 toread http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24f7acbf38a2dcaaa411979a0994da26c/hothohotho2006-09-29T16:42:34+02:00enterprise management knowledge folksonomy application 2.0 web <span style="color:#555555;">Laurie <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Damianos">Damianos</a> und John <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Griffith">Griffith</a> und Donna <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Cuomo">Cuomo</a> und David <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Hirst">Hirst</a> und James <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Smallwood">Smallwood</a> </span><em>Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, </em><em>May2006. </em>Fri Sep 29 16:42:34 CEST 2006Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006, Edinburgh, ScotlandMayOnomi: Social Bookmarking on a Corporate Intranet2006enterprise management knowledge folksonomy application 2.0 web We describe a technology exploration of social bookmarking within a closed, corporate environment. We hypothesize that such a tool would be valuable for information sharing, information management, and social networking in our organization. In order to assess the value of social software, we have embarked upon a 6-month pilot, or trial period, where we are striving to reach critical mass through marketing strategies and targeting influential figures with large, social networks. Our goal is to demonstrate the utility of social bookmarking within our corporation and to explore some of the social influences and behavioral evolution.kddhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/289c6c43ad692ccfbe4c09d31926ab8a7/hothohotho2006-03-08T16:58:31+01:00social review folksonomy bookmarking 2.0 tools web <span style="color:#555555;">Tony <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Hammond">Hammond</a> und Timo <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Hannay">Hannay</a> und Ben <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Lund">Lund</a> und Joanna <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Scott">Scott</a> </span><em>D-Lib Magazine</em><em>April2005. </em>Wed Mar 08 16:58:31 CET 2006D-Lib MagazineApril4{S}ocial {B}ookmarking {T}ools ({I}): {A} {G}eneral {R}eview112005social review folksonomy bookmarking 2.0 tools web