<rdf:RDF xmlns:burst="http://xmlns.com/burst/0.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/burst/user/hotho/rdf"><title>BibSonomy publications for /user/hotho/rdf</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/burst/user/hotho/rdf</link><description>BibSonomy BuRST Feed for /user/hotho/rdf</description><dc:date>2008-09-05T07:33:43+02:00</dc:date><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ae5cd5e31f0d7847f323a59988fdfab8/hotho"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ae5cd5e31f0d7847f323a59988fdfab8/hotho"><title>The Semantic Web Revisited</title><description>Bit of a propaganda piece for the semantic web. Urging researchers to develop and use more ontologies.

Nice informal summary but nothing new if you know about RDF, OWL and the ongoing research at W3C.</description><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ae5cd5e31f0d7847f323a59988fdfab8/hotho</link><dc:creator>hotho</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-09-11T17:25:33+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>folksonomy rdf ai web kdubiq semantic </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span style=&#034;color:#555555;&#034;&gt;Nigel &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Shadbolt&#034;&gt;Shadbolt&lt;/a&gt;  und Tim &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Berners-Lee&#034;&gt;Berners-Lee&lt;/a&gt;  und Wendy &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Hall&#034;&gt;Hall&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;IEEE Intelligent Systems&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;21(3):96-101&lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;2006&lt;/em&gt;)</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/folksonomy"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rdf"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ai"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/web"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/kdubiq"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/semantic"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics><burst:publication><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ae5cd5e31f0d7847f323a59988fdfab8/hotho"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2ae5cd5e31f0d7847f323a59988fdfab8/hotho"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12614/01/Semantic_Web_Revisted.pdf#search=%22The%20Semantic%20Web%20Revisited%22"/><swrc:date>Mon Sep 11 17:25:33 CEST 2006</swrc:date><swrc:journal>IEEE Intelligent Systems</swrc:journal><swrc:number>3</swrc:number><swrc:pages>96-101</swrc:pages><swrc:title>The Semantic Web Revisited</swrc:title><swrc:volume>21</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>folksonomy rdf ai web kdubiq semantic </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>The original Scientific American article on the Semantic Web appeared in 2001. It described the evolution of a Web that consisted largely of documents for humans to read to one that included data and information for computers to manipulate. The Semantic Web is a Web of actionable information—information derived from data through a semantic theory for interpreting the symbols. This simple idea, however, remains largely unrealized. Shopbots and auction bots abound on the Web, but these are essentially handcrafted for particular tasks; they have little ability to interact with heterogeneous data and information types. Because we haven&#039;t yet delivered large-scale, agent-based mediation, some commentators argue that the Semantic Web has failed to deliver. We argue that agents can only flourish when standards are well established and that the Web standards for expressing shared meaning have progressed steadily over the past five years. Furthermore, we see the use of ontologies in the e-science community presaging ultimate success for the Semantic Web—just as the use of HTTP within the CERN particle physics community led to the revolutionary success of the original Web.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="http://dsonline.computer.org/portal/site/dsonline/menuitem.9ed3d9924aeb0dcd82ccc6716bbe36ec/index.jsp?&amp;pName=dso_level1&amp;path=dsonline/2006/07&amp;file=x3sem.xml&amp;xsl=article.xsl&amp;" swrc:key="ee"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Nigel Shadbolt"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Tim Berners-Lee"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Wendy Hall"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author><swrc:editor><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Steffen Staab"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:editor></rdf:Description></burst:publication></item></rdf:RDF>