http://www.bibsonomy.org/burst/user/mariav0411/lv_wisskommBibSonomy BuRST Feed for /user/mariav0411/lv_wisskomm2008-07-21T01:31:40+02:00SAGE Journals Online -- Search Resultshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26aafc56b3dc8271f31d9c9c4fcda9fcd/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-13T17:56:09+01:00lv_wisskomm public different_perspecitve <span style="color:#555555;"> </span>(<em>2004</em>)Thu Mar 13 17:56:09 CET 2008Public Communication of Science and Technology: German and European Perspectives Ekkehard Winter Science Communicationvol. 25: pp. 28Public Communication of Science and Technology2004lv_wisskomm public different_perspecitve This essay describes the German initiative Science in Dialogue and its projects in the field of (1) informal science education at the interface of universities and schools, (2) science in fiction to reach a wider audience, and (3) public engagement in scientific issues. Listening to the real needs and concerns of the public is a prerequisite for this engagement. Due to the great variety of cultures and languages, a European approach to science communication is a real challenge the recently founded grassroots organization Euro Science has accepted. This essay describes the goals of the first Euro Science Open Forum to be held in Stockholm in August 2004.SAGE Journals Online -- Search Resultshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2cf4cf8b297eb87b2904db1972b2d4089/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-13T17:54:45+01:00practice theory lv_wisskomm vernacular_science <span style="color:#555555;"> </span>(<em>2007</em>)Thu Mar 13 17:54:45 CET 2008Janpp. 7-22Vernacular science knowledge: its role in everyday life communication Wolfgang Wagner Public Understanding of Science vol. 16:2007practice theory lv_wisskomm vernacular_science This paper argues that our understanding of how the public understands science is incomplete as long as we do not answer the question of why, under which conditions, and in which form the general public assimilate scientific background knowledge. Everyday life and communication are governed by criteria of social efficiency and evidence. Under the conditions of everyday life, it is sufficient for the lay person to possess and employ metaphoric and iconic representations of scientific facts—called "vernacular science knowledge"—that are wrong in scientific terms, as long as they are able to serve as acceptable and legitimate belief systems in discourses with other lay people. These representations are tools for a purpose that follow local rules of communication. Research within the framework of Social Representation Theory—collective symbolic coping with biotechnology in Europe, lay understanding of sexual conception, as well as traditional versus modern psychiatric knowledge in India—is presented to illustrate.SAGE Journals Online -- Search Resultshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/201b3b364aabe37397629c86b603a7895/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-13T17:53:19+01:00lv_wisskomm scientist public <span style="color:#555555;"> </span>(<em>1996</em>)Thu Mar 13 17:53:19 CET 2008Octpp. 375-394When scientists turn to the public: Alternative routes in science communication Massimiano Bucchi Public Understanding of Science1996; vol. 5:1996lv_wisskomm scientist public Sensation seeking, a trait that has been invoked by public health campaign scholars as a targeting variable, also holds promise for informal science education professionals who seek to engage social networks in their promotion efforts. The authors contend that sensation seeking should positively predict talk about science, even after controlling for often-cited predictors such as education, relevant employment, perceived understanding of science, perceived relevance of science, and attitude toward science. Data from a random digit dial telephone survey (N = 667) supported the authors' hypothesis. The authors note connections to the science communication and opinion leadership literatures and encourage future work in this vein.SAGE Journals Online -- Search Resultshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/225ec98550d4dd1446abbeeadb129f1ef/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-12T16:26:14+01:00lv_wisskomm types_of_literature quality_of_conclusion theory <span style="color:#555555;">Maarten C. A. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/van der Sanden">van der Sanden</a> and Frans J. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Meijman">Meijman</a> </span>(<em>2004</em>)Wed Mar 12 16:26:14 CET 2008An Essay Maarten C. A. van der Sanden and Frans J. Meijman Science Communication, Marpp. 272-287Evidence-Based Science Communicationvol. 25:2004lv_wisskomm types_of_literature quality_of_conclusion theory Use of the literature review in scientific publications is often poorly thought out and unsystematic. The reader, therefore, has no insight into the quality of the conclusions that were drawn from the literature used. Those conclusions are often based on a coincidental, and not necessarily complete, set of articles. A set of empirical findings resulting from methodologically sound research, as well as a set of essays or editorials can be interesting and peer-reviewed, but the informational value, based on the validity and relevance of both types of literature, is different. This has consequences for which publications should weigh more heavily in the conclusions of a literature review or in the design of an educational science campaign, for example. We make a plea for a systematic literature search within the field of science communication. We will propose a system for evidence-based science communication based on the principles of evidence-based medicine.SAGE Journals Online -- Search Resultshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c22bee4ba3d89396b8a81bdd89de1464/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-12T16:23:32+01:00lv_wisskomm theory <span style="color:#555555;">Steve <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Miller">Miller</a> </span>(<em>2003</em>)Wed Mar 12 16:23:32 CET 2008Janpp. 105-108Science communication ' s burnt bridges Steve Miller Public Understanding of Science2003; vol. 12:2003lv_wisskomm theory Book reviews: Stocklmayer, Susan M., Michael M. Gore and Chris Bryant (eds.), Science Communication in theory and Practice (reviewed by Steve Miller)SAGE Journals Online -- Search Resultshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c6590e531955cca3e20d4a04be21ae0c/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-12T16:21:44+01:00theory informal_science_education practice lv_wisskomm science_in_fiction <span style="color:#555555;">Jos&#233; von <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Dijck">Dijck</a> </span>(<em>2003</em>)Wed Mar 12 16:21:44 CET 2008Decpp. 177-190After the"Two Cultures": Toward a"(Multi)cultural"Practice of Science Communication Jos van Dijck Science Communication2003; vol. 25:2003theory informal_science_education practice lv_wisskomm science_in_fiction This essay describes the German initiative Science in Dialogue and its projects in the field of (1) informal science education at the interface of universities and schools, (2) science in fiction to reach a wider audience, and (3) public engagement in scientific issues. Listening to the real needs and concerns of the public is a prerequisite for this engagement. Due to the great variety of cultures and languages, a European approach to science communication is a real challenge the recently founded grassroots organization Euro Science has accepted. This essay describes the goals of the first Euro Science Open Forum to be held in Stockholm in August 2004.SAGE Journals Online -- Search Resultshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23fd72a0a4b87c8d377d16e479c34fca0/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-12T16:19:17+01:00lv_wisskomm theory scientific_literacy concept interactive_science_traditions <span style="color:#555555;">Robert <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/A.Logan">A.Logan</a> </span>(<em>2001</em>)Wed Mar 12 16:19:17 CET 2008vol. 23: pp. 13Science Mass Communication: Its Conceptual History ROBERT A.2001lv_wisskomm theory scientific_literacy concept interactive_science_traditions This article provides a conceptual history of science mass communication, which is seen as divided into the scientific literacy and interactive science traditions. The origins of the ideas that underlie the scientific literacy and interactive science traditions, as well as some of the issues researchers have raised, are introduced. The author argues the two traditions are not mutually exclusive, although the interactive tradition is a response to the applied problems within the scientific literacy model. It is argued that the pace of research might be accelerated if there were a more comprehensive collaboration among science communication, health communication, and risk communication scholarship.SAGE Journals Online -- Search Resultshttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/297e888d6dfd75f1cd4cc17ebb4da6d2d/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-12T16:16:28+01:00lv_wisskomm theory culture diversity <span style="color:#555555;">Sibusiso <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Manzini">Manzini</a> </span>(<em>2003</em>)Wed Mar 12 16:16:28 CET 2008Effective Communication of Science in a Culturally Diverse Society2003lv_wisskomm theory culture diversity This essay outlines three practical issues to consider in order to communicate science effectively in a multicultural society. These are (1) recognition of all cultures in the development of science, (2) equitable use of language in science communication, and (3) mutual critique between science and culture. The essay emphasizes the viewthat public accessibility into and participation in science are matters of basic human rights, justice, and equity.Dialogue guides awareness and understanding of science: an essay on different goals of dialogue leading to different science communication approaches -- van der Sanden and Meijman 17 (1): 89 -- Public Understanding of Sciencehttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d5b02d4019daf1c404b24f8bc0e52efa/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-06T19:24:01+01:00theory university approaches lv_wisskomm <span style="color:#555555;">Maarten C.A. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/van der Sanden">van der Sanden</a> and Frans J. <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Meijman">Meijman</a> </span><em>Public Understanding of Science</em><em>17(1):89-103</em>(<em>2008</em>)Thu Mar 06 19:24:01 CET 2008Public Understanding of Science189-103{Dialogue guides awareness and understanding of science: an essay on different goals of dialogue leading to different science communication approaches}172008theory university approaches lv_wisskomm Dialogue has become a buzzword in science communication. Many governmental initiatives involving information transfer use dialogue as a selling point. We have, for example, a dialogue on genetic manipulation, a dialogue on the scientific future of Europe, a dialogue on food safety. Dialogue has almost become a communication target on its own, beside such things as public understanding or awareness of science. Dialogue is, however, just a technique, a method that can be used in any modality of science communication to serve any of its goals. New developments in the growing use of dialogue should therefore be considered as part of science communication as a whole. In this essay we discuss the various operationalizations of dialogue for different science communication modalities and goals, based on different notions of science. Dialogue offers various possibilities for science communication. There is an important difference between dialogue with a functional goal and dialogue with a conceptual goal. This distinction and its implications are based on our recent study on effective biomedical science communication on predictive DNA diagnostics. Amazon.de: Wissenschaftskommunikation im Internet. Neue Medien in der Archäologie: Stefanie Samida: Bücherhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2200c002f5dc141a5e34c07dece316df5/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-06T19:22:37+01:00internet theory new_media lv_wisskomm archäologie <span style="color:#555555;">Stefanie <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Samida">Samida</a> </span><em>Fischer (Reinhard), M&#252;nchen, </em><em>1 edition, </em>(<em>2006</em>)Thu Mar 06 19:22:37 CET 20081Wissenschaftskommunikation im Internet. Neue Medien in der Archäologie2006internet theory new_media lv_wisskomm archäologie Die so genannten Neuen Medien, allen voran das Internet, haben in den letzten Jahren auch die Wissenschaft grundlegend beeinflusst. Am Beispiel der Prähistorischen Archäologie sucht die vorliegende Untersuchung vor allem folgende Fragen zu beantworten: Welcher Art ist der durch die digitalen Medien bedingte Wandel im Wissenschaftssystem? Wie ist die Akzeptanz in der 'Scientific Community'? Welche Auswirkungen haben die Neuen Medien auf die Popularisierung wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse? Damit wird erstmals das Verhältnis der immer wieder als 'weltfremd' und 'technologiefeindlich' bezeichneten geisteswissenschaftlichen Fächer zu den Neuen Medien thematisiert. Als theoretische Bezugsebene dienen dabei die bisher vor allem in der Soziologie erörterten Konzepte 'Cyberscience' und 'Public Understanding of Science' (PUS). Die so genannten Neuen Medien, allen voran das Internet, haben in den letzten Jahren auch die Wissenschaft grundlegend beeinflusst. Am Beispiel der Prähistorischen Archäologie sucht die vorliegende Untersuchung vor allem folgende Fragen zu beantworten: Welcher Art ist der durch die digitalen Medien bedingte Wandel im Wissenschaftssystem? Wie ist die Akzeptanz in der 'Scientific Community'? Welche Auswirkungen haben die Neuen Medien auf die Popularisierung wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse? Damit wird erstmals das Verhältnis der immer wieder als 'weltfremd' und 'technologiefeindlich' bezeichneten geisteswissenschaftlichen Fächer zu den Neuen Medien thematisiert. Als theoretische Bezugsebene dienen dabei die bisher vor allem in der Soziologie erörterten Konzepte 'Cyberscience' und 'Public Understanding of Science' (PUS). Auf der Grundlage quantitativer und qualitativer Analysen liefert die Autorin überzeugende Ergebnisse zum Potenzial neuer Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien in der Archäologie und darüber hinaus.Amazon.de: Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit als Ressourcen füreinander. Studien zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte im 20. Jahrhundert: Sybilla Nikolow,Arne Schirrmacher: Bücherhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/290778a12c7b0377d571b4fed4a2a2df4/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-06T18:53:40+01:00Öffentlichkeit_Adressat_Wissenschaft Öffentlichkeit lv_wisskomm push_pull theory <span style="color:#555555;">Sybilla <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Nikolow">Nikolow</a> and Arne <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Schirrmacher">Schirrmacher</a> </span><em>Campus Verlag, </em><em>1 edition, </em>(<em>2007</em>)Thu Mar 06 18:53:40 CET 20081Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit als Ressourcen füreinander. Studien zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte im 20. Jahrhundert2007Öffentlichkeit_Adressat_Wissenschaft Öffentlichkeit lv_wisskomm push_pull theory Studien zur historischen Sozialwissenschaft Herausgegeben von Gerhard Botz und Josef Ehmer Atomforschung und Volkskunde, Vitamine und Eugenik sind wissenschaftliche Themen, die durch öffentliche Kommunikation mit konstituiert und geformt wurden. Denn was Wissenschaft ist, wird nicht allein an den Orten der wissenschaftlichen Praxis entschieden, sondern auch in der Öffentlichkeit. In diesem Band wird anhand der Wissenschaftsgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts gezeigt, welchen Gewinn beide Seiten aus dem wechselseitigen Austausch ziehen. Amazon.de: Qualität und Quantität wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen: Bibliometrische Aspekte der Wissenschaftskommunikation: Maja Jokic,Rafael Ball: Bücherhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27a4d37a24334eb86dc8df3e7ee1800c5/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-06T18:51:57+01:00bibliometrische_analyse lv_wisskomm theory datenbanken <span style="color:#555555;">Maja <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Jokic">Jokic</a> and Rafael <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Ball">Ball</a> </span><em>Forschungszentrum J&#252;lich, </em>(<em>2006</em>)Thu Mar 06 18:51:57 CET 2008Qualität und Quantität wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen: Bibliometrische Aspekte der Wissenschaftskommunikation2006bibliometrische_analyse lv_wisskomm theory datenbanken Amazon.de: Wissenschaft erfolgreich kommunizieren. Erfolgsfaktoren der Wissenschaftskommunikation: Erfolgsfaktoren Der Wissenschaftskommunikation: Kerstin von Aretin,Guenther Wess: Bücherhttp://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2188778cdddc533f8dee6e9ea5ea13333/mariav0411mariav04112008-03-06T18:50:24+01:00theory verhältnis_forschung_öffentlichkeit forscher lv_wisskomm auflagebringenden_journalisten <span style="color:#555555;">Kerstin von <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Aretin">Aretin</a> and Guenther <a href="http://www.bibsonomy.org/author/Wess">Wess</a> </span><em>Wiley-VCH, </em><em>1 edition, </em>(<em>2004</em>)Thu Mar 06 18:50:24 CET 20081Wissenschaft erfolgreich kommunizieren. Erfolgsfaktoren der Wissenschaftskommunikation: Erfolgsfaktoren Der Wissenschaftskommunikation2004theory verhältnis_forschung_öffentlichkeit forscher lv_wisskomm auflagebringenden_journalisten Die Kommunikation zwischen der Scientific Community auf der einen Seite und der Öffentlichkeit, Politik und Lehre auf der anderen spielt heute eine größere Rolle denn je. Aber wie präsentiert man hochkomplexe Informationen verständlich? Repräsentanten aus allen Bereichen der Wissenschaftskommunikation - vom Forscher über den Journalisten bishin zum Manager - tragen zu diesem spannenden, praxisnahen und hochinformativen Werk bei, das mehr als nur einen "How-to-do"-Ansatz zum Thema Wissenschaftskommunikation ist. Aktuelle Diskussionen über Innovation, über die durch die Globalisierung auftretenden interkulturelle Aspekte sowie über den Wissenschaftsstandort Deutschland sind integriert.