BibSonomyburst/user/nepomuk/engine logsonomyBibSonomy RSS feed for /user/nepomuk/engine logsonomy2012-02-17T03:34:40+01:00http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27eb26a177187ea8cf788cc897d66ee48/nepomuknepomuk2010-02-04T09:21:48+01:002008 engine folksonomy from:jaeschke l3s logsonomy myown search wp5 <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media ICWSM 2008, </em><em>page 192--193. </em><em>Menlo Park, CA, USA, </em><em>AAAI Press, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Thu Feb 04 09:21:48 CET 2010Menlo Park, CA, USAProceedings of the Second International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2008)192--193Logsonomy -- A Search Engine Folksonomy20082008 engine folksonomy from:jaeschke l3s logsonomy myown search wp5 In social bookmarking systems users describe bookmarks by keywords called tags. The structure behind these social systems, called folksonomies, can be viewed as a tripartite hypergraph of user, tag and resource nodes. This underlying network shows specific structural properties that explain its growth and the possibility of serendipitous exploration. Search engines filter the vast information of the web. Queries describe a user’s information need. In response to the displayed results of the search engine, users click on the links of the result page as they expect the answer to be of relevance. The clickdata can be represented as a folksonomy in which queries are descriptions of clicked URLs. This poster analyzes the topological characteristics of the resulting tripartite hypergraph of queries, users and bookmarks of two query logs and compares it two a snapshot of the folksonomy del.icio.us.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e64d14f3207766f4afc65983fa759ffe/nepomuknepomuk2009-05-13T09:36:02+02:002008 analysis engine from:jaeschke information l3s logsonomy myown network retrieval search social wp5 <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>HT &#039;08: Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, </em><em>page 157--166. </em><em>New York, NY, USA, </em><em>ACM, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Wed May 13 09:36:02 CEST 2009New York, NY, USAHT '08: Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia157--166Logsonomy - Social Information Retrieval with Logdata20082008 analysis engine from:jaeschke information l3s logsonomy myown network retrieval search social wp5 Social bookmarking systems constitute an established part of the Web 2.0. In such systems users describe bookmarks by keywords called tags. The structure behind these social systems, called folksonomies, can be viewed as a tripartite hypergraph of user, tag and resource nodes. This underlying network shows specific structural properties that explain its growth and the possibility of serendipitous exploration. Today’s search engines represent the gateway to retrieve information from the World Wide Web. Short queries typically consisting of two to three words describe a user’s information need. In response to the displayed results of the search engine, users click on the links of the result page as they expect the answer to be of relevance. This clickdata can be represented as a folksonomy in which queries are descriptions of clicked URLs. The resulting network structure, which we will term logsonomy is very similar to the one of folksonomies. In order to find out about its properties, we analyze the topological characteristics of the tripartite hypergraph of queries, users and bookmarks on a large snapshot of del.icio.us and on query logs of two large search engines. All of the three datasets show small world properties. The tagging behavior of users, which is explained by preferential attachment of the tags in social bookmark systems, is reflected in the distribution of single query words in search engines. We can conclude that the clicking behaviour of search engine users based on the displayed search results and the tagging behaviour of social bookmarking users is driven by similar dynamics.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/276d81124951ae39060a8bc98f4883435/nepomuknepomuk2008-06-20T14:42:46+02:00analysis engine from:jaeschke information l3s logsonomy network retrieval search social wp5 <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>HT &#039;08: Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, </em><em>page 157--166. </em><em>New York, NY, USA, </em><em>ACM, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Fri Jun 20 14:42:46 CEST 2008New York, NY, USAHT '08: Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia157--166Logsonomy - Social Information Retrieval with Logdata2008analysis engine from:jaeschke information l3s logsonomy network retrieval search social wp5 Social bookmarking systems constitute an established part of the Web 2.0. In such systems users describe bookmarks by keywords called tags. The structure behind these social systems, called folksonomies, can be viewed as a tripartite hypergraph of user, tag and resource nodes. This underlying network shows specific structural properties that explain its growth and the possibility of serendipitous exploration. Today’s search engines represent the gateway to retrieve information from the World Wide Web. Short queries typically consisting of two to three words describe a user’s information need. In response to the displayed results of the search engine, users click on the links of the result page as they expect the answer to be of relevance. This clickdata can be represented as a folksonomy in which queries are descriptions of clicked URLs. The resulting network structure, which we will term logsonomy is very similar to the one of folksonomies. In order to find out about its properties, we analyze the topological characteristics of the tripartite hypergraph of queries, users and bookmarks on a large snapshot of del.icio.us and on query logs of two large search engines. All of the three datasets show small world properties. The tagging behavior of users, which is explained by preferential attachment of the tags in social bookmark systems, is reflected in the distribution of single query words in search engines. We can conclude that the clicking behaviour of search engine users based on the displayed search results and the tagging behaviour of social bookmarking users is driven by similar dynamics.http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2359e1eccdc524334d4a2ad51330f76ae/nepomuknepomuk2008-06-20T14:39:26+02:002008 engine folksonomy from:jaeschke l3s logsonomy myown search wp5 <span class="authorEditorList"><a href="/author/Jäschke">Robert Jäschke</a>, <a href="/author/Krause">Beate Krause</a>, <a href="/author/Hotho">Andreas Hotho</a>, and <a href="/author/Stumme">Gerd Stumme</a> </span><em>Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Weblogs and Social MediaICWSM 2008, </em><em>AAAI Press, </em>(<em>2008</em>)Fri Jun 20 14:39:26 CEST 2008Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media(ICWSM 2008)Logsonomy — A Search Engine Folksonomy20082008 engine folksonomy from:jaeschke l3s logsonomy myown search wp5 In social bookmarking systems users describe bookmarks by keywords called tags. The structure behind these social systems, called folksonomies, can be viewed as a tripartite hypergraph of user, tag and resource nodes. This underlying network shows specific structural properties that explain its growth and the possibility of serendipitous exploration. Search engines filter the vast information of the web. Queries describe a user’s information need. In response to the displayed results of the search engine, users click on the links of the result page as they expect the answer to be of relevance. The clickdata can be represented as a folksonomy in which queries are descriptions of clicked URLs. This poster analyzes the topological characteristics of the resulting tripartite hypergraph of queries, users and bookmarks of two query logs and compares it two a snapshot of the folksonomy del.icio.us.