<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!-- This file was exported from BibSonomy, http://www.bibsonomy.org -->

<bibliography>

<biblioentry xreflabel="journals/corr/abs-0802-2201" id="journals/corr/abs-0802-2201">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>M.</firstname><othername role="mi">S.</othername><surname>Baptista</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Christiane</firstname><surname>Bohn</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Reinhold</firstname><surname>Kliegl</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Ralf</firstname><surname>Engbert</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>J&#252;rgen</firstname><surname>Kurths</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Reconstruction of eye movements during blinks</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">CoRR</citetitle>

   <volumenum>abs/0802.2201</volumenum> 


   <pubdate>2008</pubdate>  

</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="EngbertKliegl03" id="EngbertKliegl03">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>R.</firstname><surname>Engbert</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>R.</firstname><surname>Kliegl</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">Vision Research</citetitle>

   <volumenum>43</volumenum> 

   <artpagenums>1035-1045</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2003</pubdate>  

</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="EngbertKliegl2003" id="EngbertKliegl2003">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>Ralf</firstname><surname>Engbert</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Reinhold</firstname><surname>Kliegl</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">Vision Res</citetitle>

   <volumenum>43</volumenum> 

   <artpagenums>1035-1045</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2003</pubdate>  
   <abstract>
      <para>Fixational eye movements are subdivided into tremor&#44; drift&#44; and microsaccades. All three types of miniature eye movements generate small random displacements of the retinal image when viewing a stationary scene. Here we investigate the modulation of microsaccades by shifts of covert attention in a classical spatial cueing paradigm. First&#44; we replicate the suppression of microsaccades with a minimum rate about 150 ms after cue onset. Second&#44; as a new finding we observe microsaccadic enhancement with a maximum rate about 350 ms after presentation of the cue. Third&#44; we find a modulation of the orientation towards the cue direction. These multiple influences of visual attention on microsaccades accentuate their role for visual information processing. Furthermore&#44; our results suggest that microsaccades can be used to map the orientation of visual attention in psychophysical experiments.
      </para>
   </abstract>
</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="KlieglEtAl2005" id="KlieglEtAl2005">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>Reinhold</firstname><surname>Kliegl</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Antje</firstname><surname>Nuthmann</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Ralf</firstname><surname>Engbert</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Tracking the Mind During Reading: The Influence of Past&#44; Present&#44; and Future Words on Fixation Durations</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">Journal of Experimental Psychology</citetitle>

   <volumenum>135</volumenum> 

   <artpagenums>12&#x2013;35</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2005</pubdate>  
   <abstract>
      <para>Reading requires the orchestration of visual&#44; attentional&#44; language&#45;related&#44; and oculomotor processing constraints. This study replicates previous effects of frequency&#44; predictability&#44; and length of fixated words on fixation durations in natural reading and demonstrates new effects of these variables related to previous and next words. Results are based on fixation durations recorded from 222 persons&#44; each reading 144 sentences. Such evidence for distributed processing of words across fixation durations challenges psycholinguistic immediacy&#45;of&#45;processing and eye&#45;mind assumptions. Most of the time the mind processes several words in parallel at different perceptual and cognitive levels. Eye movements can help to unravel these processes.&#10;
      </para>
   </abstract>
</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="KrampeEngbertKliegl02" id="KrampeEngbertKliegl02">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>R.</firstname><othername role="mi">T.</othername><surname>Krampe</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>R.</firstname><surname>Engbert</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>R.</firstname><surname>Kliegl</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Representational Models and Nonlinear Dynamics: Irreconcilable Approaches to Human Movement Timing and Coordination or Two Sides of the Same Coin&#63; Introduction to the Special Issue on Movement Timing and Coordination</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">Brain and Cognition</citetitle>

   <volumenum>48</volumenum> 

   <artpagenums>1-6</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2002</pubdate>  

</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="MayrKliegl00" id="MayrKliegl00">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>U.</firstname><surname>Mayr</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>R.</firstname><surname>Kliegl</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Task&#45;Set Switching and Long&#45;Term Memory Retrieval</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">Journal of Experimental Psycholgy : Learning&#44; Memory and Cognition</citetitle>

   <volumenum>26</volumenum> 

   <artpagenums>1124-1140</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2000</pubdate>  

</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="MayrSpielerKliegl01" id="MayrSpielerKliegl01">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>U.</firstname><surname>Mayr</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>D.</firstname><othername role="mi">H.</othername><surname>Spieler</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>R.</firstname><surname>Kliegl</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Introduction</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">European Journal of Cognitive Psychology</citetitle>

   <volumenum>13</volumenum> 

   <artpagenums>1-4</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2001</pubdate>  

</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="oberauer2006fmc" id="oberauer2006fmc">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>K.</firstname><surname>Oberauer</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>R.</firstname><surname>Kliegl</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">A formal model of capacity limits in working memory</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">Journal of Memory and Language</citetitle>
   <publisher>
      <publishername>Elsevier</publishername>
   </publisher>
   <volumenum>55</volumenum> 

   <artpagenums>601&#x2013;626</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2006</pubdate>  
   <abstract>
      <para>A mathematical model of working&#45;memory capacity limits is proposed on the key assumption of mutual interference between items in working memory. Interference is assumed to arise from overwriting of features shared by these items. The model was fit to time&#45;accuracy data of memory&#45;updating tasks from four experiments using nonlinear mixed effect (NLME) models as a framework. The model gave a good account of the data from a numerical and a spatial task version. The performance pattern in a combination of numerical and spatial updating could be explained by variations in the interference parameter: assuming less feature overlap between contents from different domains than between contents from the same domain&#44; the model can account for double dissociations of content domains in dual&#45;task experiments. Experiment 3 extended this idea to similarity within the verbal domain. The decline of memory accuracy with increasing memory load was steeper with phonologically similar than with dissimilar material&#44; although processing speed was faster for the similar material. The model captured the similarity effects with a higher estimated interference parameter for the similar than for the dissimilar condition. The results are difficult to explain with alternative models&#44; in particular models incorporating time&#45;based decay and models assuming limited resource pools.
      </para>
   </abstract>
</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="OberauerKliegl04" id="OberauerKliegl04">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>K.</firstname><surname>Oberauer</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>R.</firstname><surname>Kliegl</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Simultaneous Cognitive Operations in Working Memory After Dual&#45;Task Practice</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</citetitle>

   <volumenum>30</volumenum> 

   <artpagenums>689-707</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2004</pubdate>  

</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="OberauerKliegl01" id="OberauerKliegl01">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>K.</firstname><surname>Oberauer</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>R.</firstname><surname>Kliegl</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Beyond resources: Formal models of complexity effects and age differences in working memory</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">European Journal of Cognitive Psychology</citetitle>

   <volumenum>13</volumenum> 

   <artpagenums>187-215</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2001</pubdate>  

</biblioentry>
</bibliography>
