EdRhodes[Hrsg.] Implementing new technologies : innovation and the management of technology 1994 RobertL.Basmann GeorgeF.Rhodes Economic inequality: survey, methods and measurements 1985 BradleyRhodes The Evolution of Resistance to Crossover and Mutation in GP Stanford Bookstore 156–162 1994 JohnRhodes PedroV.Silva Turing machines and bimachines. Theor. Comput. Sci. 400 182-224 2008 SinéadM.Rhodes DavidI.Donaldson Association and not Semantic Relationships Elicit the N400 Effect: Electrophysiological Evidence from an Explicit Language Comprehension Task Psychophysiology 45 50–59 2008 GeorgeF.Rhodes Simulating and analyzing industrial structure 1994 R.L.Sanders GrahamS.Rhodes A simulation learning approach to training first responders for radiological emergencies. Simulation Councils, Inc. 28 2007 P.G.Shekelle E.Ortiz S.Rhodes S.C.Morton M.P.Eccles J.M.Grimshaw S.H.Woolf Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated? JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 286 1461-1467 2001 CONTEXT: Practice guidelines need to be up-to-date to be useful to clinicians. No published methods are available for assessing whether existing practice guidelines are still valid, nor does any empirical information exist regarding how often such assessments need to be made. OBJECTIVES: To assess the current validity of 17 clinical practice guidelines published by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) that are still in circulation, and to use this information to estimate how quickly guidelines become obsolete. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We developed criteria for defining when a guideline needs updating, mailed surveys to members of the original AHRQ guideline panels (n = 170; response rate, 71%), and searched the literature for evidence through March 2000 (n = 6994 titles yielding 173 articles plus 159 new guidelines on the same topics). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of new evidence calling for a major, minor, or no update of the 17 guidelines; survival analysis of the rate at which guidelines became outdated. RESULTS: For 7 guidelines, new evidence and expert judgment indicated that a major update is required; 6 were found to be in need of a minor update; 3 were judged as still valid; and for 1 guideline, we could reach no conclusion. Survival analysis indicated that about half the guidelines were outdated in 5.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-6.6 years). The point at which no more than 90% of the guidelines were still valid was 3.6 years (95% CI, 2.6-4.6 years). CONCLUSIONS: More than three quarters of the AHRQ guidelines need updating. As a general rule, guidelines should be reassessed for validity every 3 years. BaoqiangYan PhilipJ.Rhodes Toward automatic parallelization of spatial computation for computing clusters. ACM 45-54 2008 Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services 2007, Orlando, Florida, USA, October 7-10, 2007 ACM 2007