<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!-- This file was exported from BibSonomy, http://www.bibsonomy.org -->

<bibliography>

<biblioentry xreflabel="Solove:2007" id="Solove:2007">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>Daniel</firstname><othername role="mi">J.</othername><surname>Solove</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">&#34;I&#39;ve Got Nothing to Hide&#34; and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy</citetitle>
   <citetitle pubwork="journal">San Diego Law Review&#44; Vol. 44&#44; No. &#35;&#44; 2007</citetitle>
   <publisher>
      <publishername>SSRN</publishername>
   </publisher>



   <pubdate>2007</pubdate>  
   <abstract>
      <para>In this short essay&#44; written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review&#44; Professor Daniel Solove examines the &#34;nothing to hide&#34; argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining&#44; many people respond by declaring: &#34;I&#39;ve got nothing to hide.&#34; According to the &#34;nothing to hide&#34; argument&#44; there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity&#44; in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The &#34;nothing to hide&#34; argument and its variants are quite prevalent&#44; and thus are worth addressing. In this essay&#44; Solove critiques the &#34;nothing to hide&#34; argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
      </para>
   </abstract>
</biblioentry>
</bibliography>
