MikeBeedle MartineDevos YonatSharon KenSchwaber JeffSutherland SCRUM: An extension pattern language for hyperproductive software development 2000 The patterns of the SCRUM development method are presented as an extension pattern language to the existing organizational pattern languages. In the last few years, the SCRUM development method has rapidly gained recognition as an effective tool to hyper-productive software development. However, when SCRUM patterns are combined with other existing organizational patterns, they lead to highly adaptive, yet well-structured software development organizations. Also, decomposing SCRUM into patterns can guide adoption of only those parts of SCRUM that are applicable to a specific situation. RichardP.Brent SutherlandPierrickGaudry EmmanuelThomé PaulZimmermann Faster Multiplication in GF(2)[x]. Springer 5011 153-166 2008 RichardE.DeVor Tsong-howChang JohnWilliamSutherland*1958-* JohnW. ACR:Sutherland Statistical quality design and control : contemporary concepts and methods 2nd ed 2007 KiranS.Kedlaya AndrewV.Sutherland Computing L-Series of Hyperelliptic Curves. Springer 5011 312-326 2008 B.S.Shastry B.Sutherland Untitled Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 243 1990 Dr.JeffSutherland Agile Development: Lessons Learned From The First Scrum 2004 KarenSutherland KennethMcLeod AlbertBurger Semantically linking web pages to web services in Bioinformatics. GI 134 723-728 2008 WilliamJ.Sutherland MarkJ.Bailey IanP.Bainbridge TomBrereton JaimieT. A.Dick JoannaDrewitt NicholasK.Dulvy NicholasR.Dusic RobertP.Freckleton KevinJ.Gaston PamM.Gilder RhysE.Green A.LouiseHeathwaite SallyM.Johnson DavidW.Macdonald RogerMitchell DanielOsborn RogerP.Owen JulesPretty StephanieV.Prior HavardProsser AndrewS.Pullin PaulRose AndrewStott TomTew ChrisD.Thomas DesB. A.Thompson JulietA.Vickery MattWalker CliveWalmsley StuartWarrington AndrewR.Watkinson RichJ.Williams RosieWoodroffe HarryJ.Woodroof Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning Journal of Applied Ecology 0 ???-??? 2008 Summary 1. Horizon scanning is an essential tool for environmental scientists if they are to contribute to the evidence base for Government, its agencies and other decision makers to devise and implement environmental policies. The implication of not foreseeing issues that are foreseeable is illustrated by the contentious responses to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops in the UK, and by challenges surrounding biofuels, foot and mouth disease, avian influenza and climate change. 2. A total of 35 representatives from organizations involved in environmental policy, academia, scientific journalism and horizon scanning were asked to use wide consultation to identify the future novel or step changes in threats to, and opportunities for, biodiversity that might arise in the UK up to 2050, but that had not been important in the recent past. At least 452 people were consulted. 3. Cases for 195 submitted issues were distributed to all participants for comments and additions. All issues were scored (probability, hazard, novelty and overall score) prior to a 2-day workshop. Shortlisting to 41 issues and then the final 25 issues, together with refinement of these issues, took place at the workshop during another two rounds of discussion and scoring. 4. We provide summaries of the 25 shortlisted issues and outline the research needs. 5. We suggest that horizon scanning incorporating wide consultation with providers and users of environmental science is used by environmental policy makers and researchers. This can be used to identify gaps in knowledge and policy, and to identify future key issues for biodiversity, including those arising from outside the domains of ecology and biodiversity. 6. Synthesis and applications. Horizon scanning can be used by environmental policy makers and researchers to identify gaps in knowledge and policy. Drawing on the experience, expertise and research of policy advisors, academics and journalists, this exercise helps set the agenda for policy, practice and research. JeffreyV.Sutherland Business object design and implementation : OOPSLA '95 workshop proceedings, 16 October 1995, Austin, Texas 1997 WendySutherland-Smith Pandora's box: academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4 83–95 2005 Plagiarism is viewed by many academics as a kind of Pandora's box1–the elements contained inside are too frightening to allow escape for fear of the havoc that may result. Reluctance by academic members of staff to discuss student plagiarism openly may contribute to the often untenable situations we, as teachers, face when dealing with student plagiarism issues. In this article, I examine the dilemmas English for Academic Purposes (EAP) staff face when dealing with student plagiarism in the tertiary classroom. The perceptions of all 11 teachers involved in teaching a first year EAP writing subject at South-Coast University2 are detailed in light of the university's policy on plagiarism. My research indicates that not only is an agreed definition of plagiarism difficult to reach by members of staff teaching the same subject, but plagiarism is a multi-layered phenomenon encompassing a spectrum of human intention. Evaluating the spectrum can lead to differences in the implementation of university plagiarism policy, the result of which embodies issues of equity. The aim of the article is to encourage policy-makers and academic staff to acknowledge the concerns about implementation of plagiarism policy. Collaborative, cross-disciplinary re-thinking of plagiarism is needed to reach workable solutions.