<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!-- This file was exported from BibSonomy, http://www.bibsonomy.org -->

<bibliography>

<biblioentry xreflabel="1148181" id="1148181">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>Balog&#44;</firstname><surname>Krisztian</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Azzopardi&#44;</firstname><surname>Leif</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>de</firstname><othername role="mi">Rijke&#44;</othername><surname>Maarten</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora</citetitle>

   <publisher>
      <publishername>ACM</publishername>
   </publisher>


   <artpagenums>43&#x2013;50</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2006</pubdate>  
   <abstract>
      <para>Searching an organization&#39;s document repositories for experts provides a cost effective solution for the task of expert finding. We present two general strategies to expert searching given a document collection which are formalized using generative probabilistic models. The first of these directly models an expert&#39;s knowledge based on the documents that they are associated with&#44; whilst the second locates documents on topic&#44; and then finds the associated expert. Forming reliable associations is crucial to the performance of expert finding systems. Consequently&#44; in our evaluation we compare the different approaches&#44; exploring a variety of associations along with other operational parameters (such as topicality). Using the TREC Enterprise corpora&#44; we show that the second strategy consistently outperforms the first. A comparison against other unsupervised techniques&#44; reveals that our second model delivers excellent performance.
      </para>
   </abstract>
</biblioentry>
</bibliography>

