<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!-- This file was exported from BibSonomy, http://www.bibsonomy.org -->

<bibliography>

<biblioentry xreflabel="19051982" id="19051982">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>Decker&#44;</firstname><othername role="mi">Simon Scerri Siegfried Handschuh</othername><surname>Stefan</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Semantic Email as a Communication Medium for the Social Semantic Desktop</citetitle>





   <pubdate>2008</pubdate>  
   <abstract>
      <para>In this paper&#44; we introduce a formal email workflow model based on&#13;&#10;traditional email&#44; which enables the user to define and execute ad&#45;hoc&#13;&#10;workflows in an intuitive way. This model paves the way for semantic&#13;&#10;annotation of implicit&#44; well&#45;defined workflows&#44; thus making them explicit and&#13;&#10;exposing the missing information in a machine processable way. Grounding&#13;&#10;this work within the Social Semantic Desktop [1] via appropriate ontologies&#13;&#10;means that this information can be exploited for the benefit of the user. This&#13;&#10;will have a direct impact on their personal information management &#45; given&#13;&#10;email is not just a major channel of data exchange between desktops&#44; but it also&#13;&#10;serves as a virtual working environment where people collaborate. Thus the&#13;&#10;presented workflow model will have a concrete manifestation in the creation&#44;&#13;&#10;organization and exchange of semantic desktop data.
      </para>
   </abstract>
</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="krause2008logsonomy" id="krause2008logsonomy">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>Krause&#44;</firstname><surname>Beate</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>J&#228;schke&#44;</firstname><surname>Robert</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Hotho&#44;</firstname><surname>Andreas</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Stumme&#44;</firstname><surname>Gerd</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Logsonomy &#45; Social Information Retrieval with Logdata</citetitle>

   <publisher>
      <publishername>ACM</publishername>
   </publisher>


   <artpagenums>157&#x2013;166</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2008</pubdate>  
   <abstract>
      <para>Social bookmarking systems constitute an established&#13;&#10;part of the Web 2.0. In such systems&#13;&#10;users describe bookmarks by keywords&#13;&#10;called tags. The structure behind these social&#13;&#10;systems&#44; called folksonomies&#44; can be viewed&#13;&#10;as a tripartite hypergraph of user&#44; tag and resource&#13;&#10;nodes. This underlying network shows&#13;&#10;specific structural properties that explain its&#13;&#10;growth and the possibility of serendipitous&#13;&#10;exploration.&#13;&#10;Today&#8217;s search engines represent the gateway&#13;&#10;to retrieve information from the World Wide&#13;&#10;Web. Short queries typically consisting of&#13;&#10;two to three words describe a user&#8217;s information&#13;&#10;need. In response to the displayed&#13;&#10;results of the search engine&#44; users click on&#13;&#10;the links of the result page as they expect&#13;&#10;the answer to be of relevance.&#13;&#10;This clickdata can be represented as a folksonomy&#13;&#10;in which queries are descriptions of&#13;&#10;clicked URLs. The resulting network structure&#44;&#13;&#10;which we will term logsonomy is very&#13;&#10;similar to the one of folksonomies. In order&#13;&#10;to find out about its properties&#44; we analyze&#13;&#10;the topological characteristics of the tripartite&#13;&#10;hypergraph of queries&#44; users and bookmarks&#13;&#10;on a large snapshot of del.icio.us and&#13;&#10;on query logs of two large search engines.&#13;&#10;All of the three datasets show small world&#13;&#10;properties. The tagging behavior of users&#44;&#13;&#10;which is explained by preferential attachment&#13;&#10;of the tags in social bookmark systems&#44; is&#13;&#10;reflected in the distribution of single query&#13;&#10;words in search engines. We can conclude&#13;&#10;that the clicking behaviour of search engine&#13;&#10;users based on the displayed search results&#13;&#10;and the tagging behaviour of social bookmarking&#13;&#10;users is driven by similar dynamics.
      </para>
   </abstract>
</biblioentry>
<biblioentry xreflabel="krause2008logsonomy" id="krause2008logsonomy">
   <authorgroup>
       <author><firstname>Krause&#44;</firstname><surname>Beate</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>J&#228;schke&#44;</firstname><surname>Robert</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Hotho&#44;</firstname><surname>Andreas</surname></author>
       <author><firstname>Stumme&#44;</firstname><surname>Gerd</surname></author> 
   </authorgroup>
<citetitle pubwork="article">Logsonomy &#45; Social Information Retrieval with Logdata</citetitle>

   <publisher>
      <publishername>ACM</publishername>
   </publisher>


   <artpagenums>157&#x2013;166</artpagenums> 
   <pubdate>2008</pubdate>  
   <abstract>
      <para>Social bookmarking systems constitute an established&#13;&#10;part of the Web 2.0. In such systems&#13;&#10;users describe bookmarks by keywords&#13;&#10;called tags. The structure behind these social&#13;&#10;systems&#44; called folksonomies&#44; can be viewed&#13;&#10;as a tripartite hypergraph of user&#44; tag and resource&#13;&#10;nodes. This underlying network shows&#13;&#10;specific structural properties that explain its&#13;&#10;growth and the possibility of serendipitous&#13;&#10;exploration.&#13;&#10;Today&#8217;s search engines represent the gateway&#13;&#10;to retrieve information from the World Wide&#13;&#10;Web. Short queries typically consisting of&#13;&#10;two to three words describe a user&#8217;s information&#13;&#10;need. In response to the displayed&#13;&#10;results of the search engine&#44; users click on&#13;&#10;the links of the result page as they expect&#13;&#10;the answer to be of relevance.&#13;&#10;This clickdata can be represented as a folksonomy&#13;&#10;in which queries are descriptions of&#13;&#10;clicked URLs. The resulting network structure&#44;&#13;&#10;which we will term logsonomy is very&#13;&#10;similar to the one of folksonomies. In order&#13;&#10;to find out about its properties&#44; we analyze&#13;&#10;the topological characteristics of the tripartite&#13;&#10;hypergraph of queries&#44; users and bookmarks&#13;&#10;on a large snapshot of del.icio.us and&#13;&#10;on query logs of two large search engines.&#13;&#10;All of the three datasets show small world&#13;&#10;properties. The tagging behavior of users&#44;&#13;&#10;which is explained by preferential attachment&#13;&#10;of the tags in social bookmark systems&#44; is&#13;&#10;reflected in the distribution of single query&#13;&#10;words in search engines. We can conclude&#13;&#10;that the clicking behaviour of search engine&#13;&#10;users based on the displayed search results&#13;&#10;and the tagging behaviour of social bookmarking&#13;&#10;users is driven by similar dynamics.
      </para>
   </abstract>
</biblioentry>
</bibliography>

