JabRef References output

Author	Title	Year	Journal/Proceedings	Reftype	DOI/URL
Solove, D.J.	Data Mining and the Security-Liberty Debate [Abstract] [BibTeX]	2008	University of Chicago Law Review Vol. 74	article	URL
Abstract: In this essay, written for a symposium on surveillance for the University of Chicago Law Review, I examine some common difficulties in the way that liberty is balanced against security in the context of data mining. Countless discussions about the trade-offs between security and liberty begin by taking a security proposal and then weighing it against what it would cost our civil liberties. Often, the liberty interests are cast as individual rights and balanced against the security interests, which are cast in terms of the safety of society as a whole. Courts and commentators defer to the government's assertions about the effectiveness of the security interest. In the context of data mining, the liberty interest is limited by narrow understandings of privacy that neglect to account for many privacy problems. As a result, the balancing concludes with a victory in favor of the security interest. But as I argue, important dimensions of data mining's security benefits require more scrutiny, and the privacy concerns are significantly greater than currently acknowledged. These problems have undermined the balancing process and skewed the results toward the security side of the scale.
BibTeX: @article{solove2008, author = {Daniel J. Solove}, title = {Data Mining and the Security-Liberty Debate}, journal = {University of Chicago Law Review}, year = {2008}, volume = {74}, url = {lawreview.uchicago.edu/issues/archive/v75/75_1/Solove.pdf } }
Solove, D.J.	The End of Privacy? [BibTeX]	2008	Scientific American Vol. 299(3), pp. 78-83	article
BibTeX: @article{Solove2008, author = {Daniel J. Solove}, title = {The End of Privacy?}, journal = {Scientific American}, year = {2008}, volume = {299}, number = {3}, pages = {78-83} }
Solove, D.J.	'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [BibTeX]	2007	San Diego Law Review Vol. 44, pp. 745 pp.	article	URL
BibTeX: @article{Sol_2007b, author = {Daniel J. Solove}, title = {'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy}, journal = {San Diego Law Review}, year = {2007}, volume = {44}, pages = {745 pp.}, url = {http://ssrn.com/paper=998565} }
Solove, D.J.	"I've Got Nothing to Hide" and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [Abstract] [BibTeX]	2007	San Diego Law Review, Vol. 44, No. #, 2007	article	URL
Abstract: In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the "nothing to hide" argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the "nothing to hide" argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The "nothing to hide" argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the "nothing to hide" argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
BibTeX: @article{solove07, author = {Daniel J. Solove}, title = {"I've Got Nothing to Hide" and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy}, journal = {San Diego Law Review, Vol. 44, No. #, 2007}, publisher = {SSRN}, year = {2007}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565} }
Solove, D.J.	'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy [BibTeX]	2007	San Diego Law Review, GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper Vol. 44(289)	article	URL
BibTeX: @article{solove07privacymisunderstandings, author = {Daniel J. Solove}, title = {'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy}, journal = {San Diego Law Review, GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper}, year = {2007}, volume = {44}, number = {289}, url = {http://ssrn.com/paper=998565} }
Solove, D.J.	I've got nothing to hide and other misunderstandings of privacy [Abstract] [BibTeX]	2007	San Diego Law Review Vol. 44(289), pp. 745	article	URL
Abstract: In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
BibTeX: @article{Solove2007ign, author = {Daniel J. Solove}, title = {I've got nothing to hide and other misunderstandings of privacy}, journal = {San Diego Law Review}, year = {2007}, volume = {44}, number = {289}, pages = {745}, note = {Associate Professor, George Washington University Law School; J.D., Yale Law School.}, url = {http://ssrn.com/abstract=998565} }
Solove, D.J.	“I’VE GOT NOTHING TO HIDE” AND OTHER MISUNDERSTANDINGS OF PRIVACY [Abstract] [BibTeX]	2007	San Diego Law Review Vol. 44(289), pp. 745	article	URL
Abstract: In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.
BibTeX: @article{solove2007vgn, author = {Daniel J. Solove}, title = {“I’VE GOT NOTHING TO HIDE” AND OTHER MISUNDERSTANDINGS OF PRIVACY}, journal = {San Diego Law Review}, year = {2007}, volume = {44}, number = {289}, pages = {745}, note = {Associate Professor, George Washington University Law School; J.D., Yale Law School.}, url = {http://ssrn.com/abstract=998565} }
Solove, D.J.	A Taxonomy of Privacy [Abstract] [BibTeX]	2006	University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 154(3), pp. 477 pp.	article	URL
Abstract: Privacy is a concept in disarray. Nobody can articulate what it means. As one commentator has observed, privacy suffers from an embarrassment of meanings. Privacy is far too vague a concept to guide adjudication and lawmaking, as abstract incantations of the importance of privacy do not fare well when pitted against more concretely-stated countervailing interests. In 1960, the famous torts scholar William Prosser attempted to make sense of the landscape of privacy law by identifying four different interests. But Prosser focused only on tort law, and the law of information privacy is significantly more vast and complex, extending to Fourth Amendment law, the constitutional right to information privacy, evidentiary privileges, dozens of federal privacy statutes, and hundreds of state statutes. Moreover, Prosser wrote over 40 years ago, and new technologies have given rise to a panoply of new privacy harms. A new taxonomy to understand privacy violations is thus sorely needed. This article develops a taxonomy to identify privacy problems in a comprehensive and concrete manner. It endeavors to guide the law toward a more coherent understanding of privacy and to serve as a framework for the future development of the field of privacy law.
BibTeX: @article{Solove_2005, author = {Daniel J. Solove}, title = {A Taxonomy of Privacy}, journal = {University of Pennsylvania Law Review}, year = {2006}, volume = {154}, number = {3}, pages = {477 pp.}, note = {GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 129}, url = {http://ssrn.com/paper=667622} }
Solove, D.J.	The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age [Abstract] [BibTeX]	2004	GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 121	misc	URL
Abstract: THE DIGITAL PERSON: TECHNOLOGY AND PRIVACY IN THE INFORMATION AGE (ISBN: 0814798462) (NYU Press 2004) explores the social, political, and legal implications of the collection and use of personal information in computer databases. In the Information Age, our lives are documented in digital dossiers maintained by hundreds (perhaps thousands) of businesses and government agencies. These dossiers are composed of bits of our personal information, which when assembled together begin to paint a portrait of our personalities. The dossiers are increasingly used to make decisions about our lives - whether we get a loan, a mortgage, a license, or a job; whether we are investigated or arrested; and whether we are permitted to fly on an airplane. Digital dossiers impact many aspects of our lives. For example, they increase our vulnerability to identity theft, a serious crime that has been escalating at an alarming rate. Moreover, since September 11th, the government has been tapping into vast stores of information collected by businesses and using it to profile people for criminal or terrorist activity. Do these developments pose a problem? Is it possible to protect privacy in a society where information flows so freely and proliferates so rapidly? THE DIGITAL PERSON seeks to answer these questions. This book explores the problem from all angles - how businesses gather personal information in massive databases; how the government increasingly provides this data to businesses through public records; and how the government is gathering personal data from businesses for its own uses. THE DIGITAL PERSON not only explores these problems, but also provides a compelling account of how we can respond to them. Using a wide variety of sources, including history, philosophy, and literature, Solove sets forth a new understanding of privacy, one that is appropriate for the new challenges of the Information Age. Solove recommends how the law can be reformed to simultaneously protect our privacy and allow us to enjoy the benefits of our increasingly digital world.
BibTeX: @misc{SSRNSolve2004, author = {Daniel J. Solove}, title = {The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age}, journal = {GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 121}, year = {2004}, url = {http://ssrn.com/paper=609721} }
Solove, D.J. & Hoofnagle, C.J.	A Model Regime of Privacy Protection [Abstract] [BibTeX]	2006	GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper(132)	article	URL
Abstract: A series of major security breaches at companies with sensitive personal information has sparked significant attention to the problems with privacy protection in the United States. Currently, the privacy protections in the United States are riddled with gaps and weak spots. Although most industrialized nations have comprehensive data protection laws, the United States has maintained a sectoral approach where certain industries are covered and others are not. In particular, emerging companies known as "commercial data brokers" have frequently slipped through the cracks of U.S. privacy law. In this article, the authors propose a Model Privacy Regime to address the problems in the privacy protection in the United States, with a particular focus on commercial data brokers. Since the United States is unlikely to shift radically from its sectoral approach to a comprehensive data protection regime, the Model Regime aims to patch up the holes in existing privacy regulation and improve and extend it. In other words, the goal of the Model Regime is to build upon the existing foundation of U.S. privacy law, not to propose an alternative foundation. The authors believe that the sectoral approach in the United States can be improved by applying the Fair Information Practices - principles that require the entities that collect personal data to extend certain rights to data subjects. The Fair Information Practices are very general principles, and they are often spoken about in a rather abstract manner. In contrast, the Model Regime demonstrates specific ways that they can be incorporated into privacy regulation in the United States.
BibTeX: @article{Sol_Hoo_2006, author = {Daniel J. Solove and Chris J. Hoofnagle}, title = {A Model Regime of Privacy Protection}, journal = {GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper}, year = {2006}, number = {132}, edition = {Version 3.0}, url = {http://ssrn.com/paper=881294} }

Created by JabRef on 01/12/2008.