Author of the publication

Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?

, , and . Scientometrics, 91 (3): 843-856 (2012)

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed. You can also use the button next to the name to display some publications already assigned to the person.

 

Other publications of authors with the same name

Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere., and . J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 59 (11): 1841-1852 (2008)How Should We Measure Individual Researcher's Performance Capacity Within and Between Universities? - Social Sciences as an Example? A Multilevel Extension of the Bibliometric Quotient (BQ)., and . ISSI, page 1098-1109. Edizioni Efesto, (2019)Count regression models in informetrics., and . J. Informetrics, 10 (1): 29-30 (2016)Predictive validity of editorial decisions at an open access journal: A case study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics., and . ELPUB, page 40-44. (2010)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches, , , , and . Review of Educational Research, 79 (3): 1290-1326 (September 2009)How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study., , and . J. Informetrics, 2 (4): 280-287 (2008)How to consider fractional counting and field normalization in the statistical modeling of bibliometric data: A multilevel Poisson regression approach., and . J. Informetrics, 13 (2): 643-657 (2019)Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication., , and . Scientometrics, 77 (3): 415-432 (2008)In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics., , , and . Scientometrics, 93 (3): 915-929 (2012)Introduction: Quantitative science and technology indicators studies in the Federal Republic of Germany., and . Scientometrics, 19 (5-6): 327-329 (1990)