<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /tag/credibility</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/rss/tag/credibility</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /tag/credibility</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1&amp;hid=11&amp;sid=cefc8e8a-3a9a-4dd3-843e-5ff5349bb5f5%40sessionmgr4&amp;bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=buh&amp;AN=9602262446"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081111-using-crowdsourced-librarians-to-out-google-google.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://captology.stanford.edu/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://credibility.stanford.edu/resources.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/web-credibility.cfm"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://credibility.stanford.edu/guidelines/index.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-credibility/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rinton.net/xjwe6/jwe-6-2/099-120.pdf"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mlanet.org/resources/userguide.html#3"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blame.ca/dick/?cat=6"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://credibilityserver.stanford.edu/guidelines/"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1&amp;hid=11&amp;sid=cefc8e8a-3a9a-4dd3-843e-5ff5349bb5f5%40sessionmgr4&amp;bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=buh&amp;AN=9602262446"><title>Physician Information Acquisition and Believability</title><description></description><link>http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1&amp;amp;hid=11&amp;amp;sid=cefc8e8a-3a9a-4dd3-843e-5ff5349bb5f5%40sessionmgr4&amp;amp;bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=buh&amp;amp;AN=9602262446</link><dc:creator>cmerdan</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-10-09T21:05:13+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Personal credibility information source </dc:subject><content:encoded></content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Personal"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/information"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/source"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081111-using-crowdsourced-librarians-to-out-google-google.html"><title>Using crowdsourced librarians to outsmart Google</title><description></description><link>http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081111-using-crowdsourced-librarians-to-out-google-google.html</link><dc:creator>cirrus</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-11-12T09:58:32+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Questionpoint Web_2.0 collective_intelligence credibility crowdsourcing librarian search_engine </dc:subject><content:encoded></content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Questionpoint"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Web_2.0"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/collective_intelligence"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/crowdsourcing"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/librarian"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/search_engine"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://captology.stanford.edu/"><title>Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab</title><description>&amp;#034;The Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab creates insight into how computing products — from websites to mobile phone software — can be designed to change what people believe and what they do.&amp;#034;</description><link>http://captology.stanford.edu/</link><dc:creator>heinzwittenbrink</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-03T16:25:12+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>captology credibility research </dc:subject><content:encoded>&amp;#034;The Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab creates insight into how computing products — from websites to mobile phone software — can be designed to change wh&lt;span class=&#034;info&#034;&gt;...&lt;div&gt;&amp;#034;The Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab creates insight into how computing products — from websites to mobile phone software — can be designed to change what people believe and what they do.&amp;#034;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/captology"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/research"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://credibility.stanford.edu/resources.html"><title>The Web Credibility Project - Stanford University: Resources</title><description>Literatur über Glaubwürdigkeit im Netz; neueste Titel von 2005</description><link>http://credibility.stanford.edu/resources.html</link><dc:creator>heinzwittenbrink</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-03T16:23:16+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>credibility ressourcen </dc:subject><content:encoded>Literatur über Glaubwürdigkeit im Netz; neueste Titel von 2005</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ressourcen"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/web-credibility.cfm"><title>Consumer Reports WebWatch Investigations : Research Reports and Consumer Investigations</title><description>Studien über Glaubwürdigkeit im Netz</description><link>http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/web-credibility.cfm</link><dc:creator>heinzwittenbrink</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-03T16:21:50+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>credibility ressourcen studies-and-reports </dc:subject><content:encoded>Studien über Glaubwürdigkeit im Netz</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ressourcen"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/studies-and-reports"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://credibility.stanford.edu/guidelines/index.html"><title>Stanford Guidelines for Web Credibility</title><description>ich habe schon mal ein blick darauf geworfen, es schien einfach nur ganz, ganz viel papier zu sein... die guidelines sind eigentlich auch allein mit gesundem menschenverstand zu formulieren</description><link>http://credibility.stanford.edu/guidelines/index.html</link><dc:creator>phutags</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-23T10:00:40+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>credibility guidelines webdesign </dc:subject><content:encoded>ich habe schon mal ein blick darauf geworfen, es schien einfach nur ganz, ganz viel papier zu sein... die guidelines sind eigentlich auch allein mit gesund&lt;span class=&#034;info&#034;&gt;...&lt;div&gt;ich habe schon mal ein blick darauf geworfen, es schien einfach nur ganz, ganz viel papier zu sein... die guidelines sind eigentlich auch allein mit gesundem menschenverstand zu formulieren&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/guidelines"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/webdesign"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-credibility/"><title>Web credibility articles &amp;amp; resources</title><description>Ganze Serie von Artikeln zur Glaubwürdigkeit von Websites; wirkt sehr interessant, Links zu anderen Ressourcen.</description><link>http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-credibility/</link><dc:creator>heinzwittenbrink</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-11-02T11:15:51+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>credibility ressourcen </dc:subject><content:encoded>Ganze Serie von Artikeln zur Glaubwürdigkeit von Websites; wirkt sehr interessant, Links zu anderen Ressourcen.</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ressourcen"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.rinton.net/xjwe6/jwe-6-2/099-120.pdf"><title>099-120.pdf (application/pdf-Objekt)</title><description>The apparent “socialization” of the Web brings new prospects as well as challenges. In this paper, the issue of credibility of Web Applications in the light of increased human participation and collaboration is considered. The stakeholder types to w</description><link>http://www.rinton.net/xjwe6/jwe-6-2/099-120.pdf</link><dc:creator>gerhardg</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-06-21T11:49:09+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>credibility paper trust web2.0 </dc:subject><content:encoded>The apparent “socialization” of the Web brings new prospects as well as challenges. In this paper, the issue of credibility of Web Applications in the ligh&lt;span class=&#034;info&#034;&gt;...&lt;div&gt;The apparent “socialization” of the Web brings new prospects as well as challenges. In this paper, the issue of credibility of Web Applications in the light of increased human participation and collaboration is considered. The stakeholder types to w&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/paper"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/trust"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/web2.0"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/"><title>An empirical examination of Wikipedia&amp;#039;s credibility</title><description></description><link>http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/</link><dc:creator>janhodel</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-01T14:39:20+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>web2.0 informationskompetenz study wiki Evaluation library research wikipedia credibility </dc:subject><content:encoded></content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/web2.0"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/informationskompetenz"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/study"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wiki"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/library"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/research"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wikipedia"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.mlanet.org/resources/userguide.html#3"><title>MLANET: A User&amp;#039;s Guide to Finding and Evaluating Health Info on the Web</title><description>Guide to credibility and usability of health information on the Web. Applies to blogs? Havnen&amp;#039;t fully evaluated it yet.</description><link>http://www.mlanet.org/resources/userguide.html#3</link><dc:creator>dhunscher</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-11-01T13:43:00+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>credibility healthcare usability </dc:subject><content:encoded>Guide to credibility and usability of health information on the Web. Applies to blogs? Havnen&amp;#039;t fully evaluated it yet.</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/healthcare"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/usability"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://blame.ca/dick/?cat=6"><title>Dick Hardt - Blame Canada » Digital Identity</title><description>Great blog. Can I just assign all my tags to it at once and be done with it?</description><link>http://blame.ca/dick/?cat=6</link><dc:creator>dhunscher</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-04-11T15:14:33+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>blog credibility dickhardt future futuring identity2.0 technology+and+society </dc:subject><content:encoded>Great blog. Can I just assign all my tags to it at once and be done with it?</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/blog"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/dickhardt"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/future"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/futuring"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/identity2.0"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/technology+and+society"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://credibilityserver.stanford.edu/guidelines/"><title>The Web Credibility Project: Guidelines - Stanford University</title><description>Some great guidelines on how to make your site (including a blog) more credible.</description><link>http://credibilityserver.stanford.edu/guidelines/</link><dc:creator>dhunscher</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-02-01T13:43:02+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>blog business credibility usability </dc:subject><content:encoded>Some great guidelines on how to make your site (including a blog) more credible.</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/blog"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/usability"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>
